Structure and mechanical properties of Saxidomus purpuratus biological shells.

The strength and fracture behavior of Saxidomus purpuratus shells were investigated and correlated with the structure. The shells show a crossed lamellar structure in the inner and middle layers and a fibrous/blocky and porous structure composed of nanoscaled particulates (~100 nm diameter) in the outer layer. It was found that the flexure strength and fracture mode are a function of lamellar organization and orientation. The crossed lamellar structure of this shell is composed of domains of parallel lamellae with approximate thickness of 200-600 nm. These domains have approximate lateral dimensions of 10-70 μm with a minimum of two orientations of lamellae in the inner and middle layers. Neighboring domains are oriented at specific angles and thus the structure forms a crossed lamellar pattern. The microhardness across the thickness was lower in the outer layer because of the porosity and the absence of lamellae. The tensile (from flexure tests) and compressive strengths were analyzed by means of Weibull statistics. The mean tensile (flexure) strength at probability of 50%, 80-105 MPa, is on the same order as the compressive strength (~50-150 MPa) and the Weibull moduli vary from 3.0 to 7.6. These values are significantly lower than abalone nacre, in spite of having the same aragonite structure. The lower strength can be attributed to a smaller fraction of the organic interlayer. The fracture path in the specimens is dominated by the orientation of the domains and proceeds preferentially along lamella boundaries. It also correlates with the color changes in the cross section of the shell. The cracks tend to undergo a considerable change in orientation when the color changes abruptly. The distributions of strengths, cracking paths, and fracture surfaces indicate that the mechanical properties of the shell are anisotropic with a hierarchical nature.

[1]  S. Spearing,et al.  Fracture mechanisms of the Strombus gigas conch shell: implications for the design of brittle laminates , 1996, Journal of Materials Science.

[2]  Hilla Peretz,et al.  Ju n 20 03 Schrödinger ’ s Cat : The rules of engagement , 2003 .

[3]  P. C. Rieke,et al.  Innovative materials processing strategies: a biomimetic approach. , 1992, Science.

[4]  Huajian Gao,et al.  Materials become insensitive to flaws at nanoscale: Lessons from nature , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  John D. Currey,et al.  The mechanical behaviour of some molluscan hard tissues , 2009 .

[6]  K. Katti,et al.  3D finite element modeling of mechanical response in nacre-based hybrid nanocomposites , 2001 .

[7]  J. Currey,et al.  Fracture in the crossed-lamellar structure ofConus shells , 1976 .

[8]  M. Meyers,et al.  Structural characterization and mechanical behavior of a bivalve shell (Saxidomus purpuratus) , 2011 .

[9]  E. A. Charles,et al.  Fracture Toughness Determinations by Indentation , 1976 .

[10]  M A Meyers,et al.  Structure and mechanical properties of selected biological materials. , 2008, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[11]  Zhigang Suo,et al.  Model for the robust mechanical behavior of nacre , 2001 .

[12]  Antonio G Checa,et al.  Self-organisation of nacre in the shells of Pterioida (Bivalvia: Mollusca). , 2005, Biomaterials.

[13]  Stephen Mann,et al.  Critical Transitions in the Biofabrication of Abalone Shells and Flat Pearls , 1996 .

[14]  John D. Currey,et al.  Further studies on the mechanical properties of mollusc shell material , 2009 .

[15]  A. P. Jackson,et al.  The mechanical design of nacre , 1988, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[16]  K. Vecchio,et al.  Mechanical properties and structure of Strombus gigas, Tridacna gigas, and Haliotis rufescens sea shells: A comparative study , 2006 .

[17]  Zhigang Suo,et al.  Deformation mechanisms in nacre , 2001 .

[18]  W. Weibull A Statistical Distribution Function of Wide Applicability , 1951 .

[19]  B. Ji A study of the interface strength between protein and mineral in biological materials. , 2008, Journal of biomechanics.

[20]  I. Aksay,et al.  Nacre of abalone shell: a natural multifunctional nanolaminated ceramic-polymer composite material. , 1992, Results and problems in cell differentiation.

[21]  R. Ballarini,et al.  Structural basis for the fracture toughness of the shell of the conch Strombus gigas , 2000, Nature.

[22]  A. Heuer,et al.  Tissue Regeneration in the Shell of the Giant Queen Conch, Strombus gigas , 2004 .

[23]  Marc A. Meyers,et al.  Quasi-static and dynamic mechanical response of Haliotis rufescens (abalone) shells , 2000 .

[24]  K. Trustrum,et al.  Statistical approach to brittle fracture , 1977 .

[25]  M. Meyers,et al.  The growth of nacre in the abalone shell. , 2008, Acta biomaterialia.

[26]  F. Barthelat,et al.  On the mechanics of mother-of-pearl: a key feature in the material hierarchical structure , 2007 .

[27]  A. Rodríguez-Navarro,et al.  The nature and formation of calcitic columnar prismatic shell layers in pteriomorphian bivalves. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[28]  A. Belcher,et al.  Structural and microstructural characterization of the growth lines and prismatic microarchitecture in red abalone shell and the microstructures of abalone flat pearls , 2002 .

[29]  K. Vecchio,et al.  Quasi-static and dynamic mechanical response of Strombus gigas (conch) shells , 2001 .

[30]  Horacio Dante Espinosa,et al.  Mechanical properties of nacre constituents and their impact on mechanical performance , 2006 .

[31]  S. Šimunović,et al.  A continuous damage random thresholds model for simulating the fracture behavior of nacre. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[32]  K. Katti,et al.  Why is nacre so tough and strong , 2006 .

[33]  K. Chawla,et al.  Mechanical Behavior of Materials , 1998 .

[34]  Robert Danzer,et al.  A general strength distribution function for brittle materials , 1992 .

[35]  A. Hall,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL AND BIOLOGICAL CONTROLS ON BIVALVE SHELL MINERALOGY , 1969, Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society.

[36]  R. J. Morgan,et al.  Biological and Synthetic Hierarchical Composites , 1992 .

[37]  Marc André Meyers,et al.  Mechanical strength of abalone nacre: role of the soft organic layer. , 2008, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[38]  Mehmet Sarikaya,et al.  Mechanical Property-Microstructural Relationships in Abalone Shell , 1989 .

[39]  John D. Taylor,et al.  The mechanical properties of bivalve (Mollusca) shell structures , 1972 .

[40]  Xiaomei Ling,et al.  Microstructures and friction-wear characteristics of bivalve shells , 2006 .

[41]  Horacio Dante Espinosa,et al.  An elasto-viscoplastic interface model for investigating the constitutive behavior of nacre , 2007 .

[42]  A. Heuer,et al.  Novel composite microstructure and mechanical behavior of mollusk shell , 1989 .

[43]  Guang-Ping Zhang,et al.  Microstructural Characterization and Hardness Behavior of a Biological Saxidomus purpuratus Shell , 2011 .

[44]  A K Soh,et al.  Structural and mechanical properties of the organic matrix layers of nacre. , 2003, Biomaterials.

[45]  Jie Zhao,et al.  The relationship between mechanical properties and crossed-lamellar structure of mollusk shells , 2008 .

[46]  John D. Currey,et al.  Mechanical properties of mother of pearl in tension , 1977, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[47]  Xiaodong Li,et al.  In situ observation of nanograin rotation and deformation in nacre. , 2006, Nano letters.

[48]  T. Samata,et al.  Bivalve shell structure and organic matrix , 2006 .

[49]  Marc A. Meyers,et al.  Growth and structure in abalone shell , 2005 .