Different Cortical Mechanisms for Spatial vs. Feature-Based Attentional Selection in Visual Working Memory

The limited capacity of visual working memory (VWM) necessitates attentional mechanisms that selectively update and maintain only the most task-relevant content. Psychophysical experiments have shown that the retroactive selection of memory content can be based on visual properties such as location or shape, but the neural basis for such differential selection is unknown. For example, it is not known if there are different cortical modules specialized for spatial vs. feature-based mnemonic attention, in the same way that has been demonstrated for attention to perceptual input. Here, we used transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to identify areas in human parietal and occipital cortex involved in the selection of objects from memory based on cues to their location (spatial information) or their shape (featural information). We found that TMS over the supramarginal gyrus (SMG) selectively facilitated spatial selection, whereas TMS over the lateral occipital cortex (LO) selectively enhanced feature-based selection for remembered objects in the contralateral visual field. Thus, different cortical regions are responsible for spatial vs. feature-based selection of working memory representations. Since the same regions are involved in terms of attention to external events, these new findings indicate overlapping mechanisms for attentional control over perceptual input and mnemonic representations.

[1]  J Douglas Crawford,et al.  Role of early visual cortex in trans-saccadic memory of object features. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[2]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Parietal disruption impairs reflexive spatial attention within and between sensory modalities , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  J. Crawford,et al.  Action relevance induces an attentional weighting of representations in visual working memory , 2017, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Jason B. Mattingley,et al.  Modality-Specific Control of Strategic Spatial Attention in Parietal Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[5]  Michael Andres,et al.  Double dissociation between motor and visual imagery in the posterior parietal cortex. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[6]  Christopher D Chambers,et al.  Parietal Stimulation Decouples Spatial and Feature-Based Attention , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  Taraz G. Lee,et al.  The Dynamic Nature of Top-Down Signals Originating from Prefrontal Cortex: A Combined fMRI–TMS Study , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[8]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Selective and divided attention during visual discriminations of shape, color, and speed: functional anatomy by positron emission tomography , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[9]  Marian E. Berryhill,et al.  The mental wormhole: Internal attention shifts without regard for distance , 2012, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[10]  D. Gitelman,et al.  Location- or Feature-Based Targeting of Peripheral Attention , 2001, NeuroImage.

[11]  A. Nobre,et al.  Orienting Attention to Locations in Internal Representations , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[12]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The lateral occipital complex and its role in object recognition , 2001, Vision Research.

[13]  Chi-Hung Juan,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation over right posterior parietal cortex changes prestimulus alpha oscillation in visual short-term memory task , 2014, NeuroImage.

[14]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Spatio-temporal analysis of feature-based attention. , 2007, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  J. Gross,et al.  On the Role of Prestimulus Alpha Rhythms over Occipito-Parietal Areas in Visual Input Regulation: Correlation or Causation? , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[16]  Paul M. Bays,et al.  Rapid Forgetting Prevented by Retrospective Attention Cues , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[17]  Jun Saiki,et al.  Different effects of color-based and location-based selection on visual working memory , 2015, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[18]  Lauren L. Richmond,et al.  Shifting Attention among Working Memory Representations: Testing Cue Type, Awareness, and Strategic Control , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[19]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Cortical Regions Involved in Perceiving Object Shape , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Maro G. Machizawa,et al.  Neural activity predicts individual differences in visual working memory capacity , 2004, Nature.

[21]  G Gratton,et al.  The contralateral organization of visual memory: a theoretical concept and a research tool. , 1998, Psychophysiology.

[22]  E. Vogel,et al.  Shape and color conjunction stimuli are represented as bound objects in visual working memory , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[23]  M. Carrasco Visual attention: The past 25 years , 2011, Vision Research.

[24]  P. Maquet,et al.  Orienting Attention to Locations in Perceptual Versus Mental Representations , 2004, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[25]  B Giesbrecht,et al.  Neural mechanisms of top-down control during spatial and feature attention , 2003, NeuroImage.

[26]  Evie Vergauwe Explorer Working Memory Units are All in Your Head , 2016 .

[27]  C. Gerloff,et al.  Enhancing cognitive performance with repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation at human individual alpha frequency , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Ventral and dorsal stream contributions to the online control of immediate and delayed grasping: A TMS approach , 2009, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Mark G. Stokes,et al.  Attention Modulates Maintenance of Representations in Visual Short-term Memory , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[30]  S. Luck,et al.  Discrete fixed-resolution representations in visual working memory , 2008, Nature.

[31]  Daryl E. Wilson,et al.  Control of Spatial and Feature-Based Attention in Frontoparietal Cortex , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  J. Devlin,et al.  Triple Dissociation of Faces, Bodies, and Objects in Extrastriate Cortex , 2009, Current Biology.

[33]  Gareth R Barnes,et al.  Modulation of alpha and gamma oscillations related to retrospectively orienting attention within working memory , 2014, The European journal of neuroscience.

[34]  John Jonides,et al.  Common and distinct neural correlates of perceptual and memorial selection , 2009, NeuroImage.

[35]  Alessandra S. Souza,et al.  In search of the focus of attention in working memory: 13 years of the retro-cue effect , 2016, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[36]  R. Luria,et al.  Object representations in visual working memory change according to the task context , 2016, Cortex.

[37]  Paul M Bays,et al.  Obligatory encoding of task-irrelevant features depletes working memory resources. , 2012, Journal of vision.

[38]  Tony Ro,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: Disrupting Neural Activity to Alter and Assess Brain Function , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[39]  Benjamin J. Tamber-Rosenau,et al.  Cortical Mechanisms of Cognitive Control for Shifting Attention in Vision and Working Memory , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[40]  Juha Silvanto,et al.  The causal role of the lateral occipital complex in visual mirror symmetry detection and grouping: An fMRI-guided TMS study , 2014, Cortex.

[41]  Yaoda Xu,et al.  The Neural Fate of Task-Irrelevant Features in Object-Based Processing , 2010, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[42]  Masud Husain,et al.  Flexibility of representational states in working memory , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[43]  A. Schubö,et al.  The Focus of Attention in Visual Working Memory: Protection of Focused Representations and Its Individual Variation , 2016, PloS one.

[44]  J Douglas Crawford,et al.  TMS over human frontal eye fields disrupts trans-saccadic memory of multiple objects. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[45]  M. Hallett Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the human brain , 2000, Nature.

[46]  A. Nobre,et al.  Cognitive control of attention in the human brain: Insights from orienting attention to mental representations , 2006, Brain Research.

[47]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[48]  O. Tzeng,et al.  Unleashing Potential: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over the Right Posterior Parietal Cortex Improves Change Detection in Low-Performing Individuals , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[49]  Nicholas E. Myers,et al.  Temporal Dynamics of Attention during Encoding versus Maintenance of Working Memory: Complementary Views from Event-related Potentials and Alpha-band Oscillations , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[50]  Tutis Vilis,et al.  Task-related laterality effects in the lateral occipital complex , 2007, Brain Research.

[51]  E. Vogel,et al.  Contralateral delay activity provides a neural measure of the number of representations in visual working memory. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[52]  Jiye G. Kim,et al.  The Benefit of Object Interactions Arises in the Lateral Occipital Cortex Independent of Attentional Modulation from the Intraparietal Sulcus: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[53]  Bruce Luber,et al.  Enhancement of human cognitive performance using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) , 2014, NeuroImage.

[54]  N. Cowan,et al.  Working memory units are all in your head: Factors that influence whether features or objects are the favored units. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[55]  Chen Shuo The Capacity of Visual Working Memory for Motion Direction of Objects , 2006 .

[56]  Anna Schubö,et al.  Feature-based and spatial attentional selection in visual working memory , 2016, Memory & Cognition.

[57]  John H. R. Maunsell,et al.  Feature-based attention in visual cortex , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[58]  A. Nobre,et al.  Top-down modulation: bridging selective attention and working memory , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[59]  Edward K. Vogel,et al.  The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions , 1997, Nature.

[60]  O. Tzeng,et al.  Right temporoparietal junction and attentional reorienting , 2013, Human brain mapping.

[61]  Roy Luria,et al.  Visual Short-term Memory Capacity for Simple and Complex Objects , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[62]  Jennifer K. E. Steeves,et al.  TMS to the Lateral Occipital Cortex Disrupts Object Processing but Facilitates Scene Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[63]  E. Wojciulik,et al.  Attention increases neural selectivity in the human lateral occipital complex , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[64]  Mark G. Stokes,et al.  Attention Biases Visual Activity in Visual Short-term Memory , 2014, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[65]  G. Mangun,et al.  Author ' s personal copy Research Report fMRI evidence for both generalized and specialized components of attentional control , 2007 .

[66]  Dwight J. Peterson,et al.  Differential Frontal Involvement in Shifts of Internal and Perceptual Attention , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[67]  J Douglas Crawford,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation over Posterior Parietal Cortex Disrupts Transsaccadic Memory of Multiple Objects , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[68]  A. Karim,et al.  Brain Oscillatory Substrates of Visual Short-Term Memory Capacity , 2009, Current Biology.

[69]  M. Catani,et al.  A lateralized brain network for visuospatial attention , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[70]  W. Klimesch Alpha-band oscillations, attention, and controlled access to stored information , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[71]  E. Pellicano,et al.  The effects of grouping on speed discrimination thresholds in adults, typically developing children, and children with autism. , 2015, Journal of vision.

[72]  Theodore P. Zanto,et al.  Causal role of the prefrontal cortex in top-down modulation of visual processing and working memory , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.