Forensic interviewing in child sexual abuse cases: Current techniques and future directions

In child sexual abuse cases, skillful forensic interviews are important to ensure the protection of innocent individuals and the conviction of perpetrators. Studies have examined several factors that influence disclosure during interviews, including both interviewer and child characteristics. Numerous interviewing techniques have received attention in the literature, including allegation blind interviews, open-ended questioning, cognitive interviewing, the Touch Survey, truth-lie discussions, and anatomical dolls. Recent studies have examined new directions in forensic interviewing, such as structured interview protocols and the extended forensic evaluation model. In addition, the child advocacy center model has been established as a strategy to prevent repeated interviewing. Child Advocacy Centers provide a safe, child-friendly atmosphere for children and families to receive services. Limitations of the research are discussed and empirically based recommendations for interviewers are provided.

[1]  Y. Orbach,et al.  Age differences in young children's responses to open-ended invitations in the course of forensic interviews. , 2003, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[2]  M. Zaragoza.  Memory and testimony in the child witness , 1995 .

[3]  D. DeMaso,et al.  Developmental differences in detection and disclosure of sexual abuse. , 1993, Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.

[4]  K. J. Sternberg,et al.  The relation between investigative utterance types and the informativeness of child witnesses , 1996 .

[5]  K. Tyler,et al.  Social and emotional outcomes of childhood sexual abuse: A review of recent research , 2002 .

[6]  N. Poythress,et al.  Psychological Evaluations for the Courts: A Handbook for Mental Health Professionals and Lawyers , 1997 .

[7]  M. Everson,et al.  Concerning Practices of Interviewers When Using Anatomical Dolls in Child Protective Services Investigations , 1996 .

[8]  Y. Orbach,et al.  Assessing the value of structured protocols for forensic interviews of alleged child abuse victims. , 2000, Child abuse & neglect.

[9]  P. Santtila,et al.  EFFECTS OF INTERVIEW PHASE, REPEATED INTERVIEWING, PRESENCE OF A SUPPORT PERSON, AND ANATOMICALLY DETAILED DOLLS ON CHILD SEXUAL ABUSE INTERVIEWS , 2004 .

[10]  G. Goodman,et al.  4. Interviewing children in and out of court: Current research and practice implications. , 2002 .

[11]  J. S. Hutcheson,et al.  Substantiation of Sexual Abuse Allegations: Factors Involved in the Decision-Making Process , 1995 .

[12]  B. Hayes,et al.  Cognitive interviewing procedures and suggestibility in children's recall. , 1997, The Journal of applied psychology.

[13]  Interviewer Questions and Content Analysis of Children's Statements of Sexual Abuse , 1999 .

[14]  D. Finkelhor,et al.  Prior victimization: a risk factor for child sexual abuse and for PTSD-related symptomatology among sexually abused youth. , 1995, Child abuse & neglect.

[15]  S. Garven,et al.  How Sexual Abuse Interviews Go Astray: Implications for Prosecutors, Police, and Child Protection Services , 2000, Child maltreatment.

[16]  C. Carnes,et al.  Extended Forensic Evaluation When Sexual Abuse is Suspected: A Multisite Field Study , 2001, Child maltreatment.

[17]  Michael E. Lamb,et al.  The effects of question type on self‐contradictions by children in the course of forensic interviews , 2001 .

[18]  R. Lindsay,et al.  Children's Conceptual Knowledge of Lying and Its Relation to Their Actual Behaviors: Implications for Court Competence Examinations , 2002, Law and human behavior.

[19]  Ronald P. Fisher,et al.  Enhancement of Eyewitness Memory with the Cognitive Interview , 1986 .

[20]  J. Adams,et al.  A validational study of the Structured Interview of Symptoms Associated with Sexual Abuse (SASA) using three samples of sexually abused, allegedly abused, and nonabused boys. , 1997, Child abuse & neglect.

[21]  H. Westcott,et al.  The impact of questioning style on the content of investigative interviews with suspected child sexual abuse victims , 2000 .

[22]  M. Lamb,et al.  The Effects of Interviewer Gender and Child Gender on the Informativeness of Alleged Child Sexual Abuse Victims in Forensic Interviews , 2003, Law and human behavior.

[23]  Amye Warren,et al.  Discussing Truth and Lies in Interviews With Children: Whether, Why, and How? , 1999 .

[24]  C. Carnes,et al.  Extended Forensic Evaluation When Sexual Abuse is Suspected: A Model and Preliminary Data , 1999 .

[25]  K. J. Sternberg,et al.  Effects of Investigative Utterance Types on Israeli Children's Responses , 1996 .

[26]  G. Payne,et al.  Outcome-based practice: disclosure rates of child sexual abuse comparing allegation blind and allegation informed structured interviews. , 1996, Child abuse & neglect.

[27]  Y. Orbach,et al.  A comparison of mental and physical context reinstatement in forensic interviews with alleged victims of sexual abuse , 2002 .

[28]  J. E. Myers,et al.  The APSAC Handbook on Child Maltreatment , 2001 .

[29]  R. E. Geiselman,et al.  Enhancement of eyewitness memory: An empirical evaluation of the cognitive interview. , 1984 .

[30]  M. Hersen.  Clinical Behavior Therapy: Adults and Children , 2002 .

[31]  Y. Orbach,et al.  Use of a structured investigative protocol enhances young children's responses to free-recall prompts in the course of forensic interviews. , 2001, The Journal of applied psychology.

[32]  D. Muram.  Child sexual abuse. , 1992, Obstetrics and gynecology clinics of North America.

[33]  Cognitive interviewing procedures and suggestibility in children's recall. , 1997 .

[34]  Charles Felzen Johnson,et al.  Child sexual abuse , 2004, The Lancet.

[35]  R. E. Geiselman,et al.  Effects of cognitive interviewing and practice on children's recall performance. , 1992 .

[36]  M. Bruck,et al.  Amicus brief for the case of State of New Jersey v. Michaels presented by Committee of Concerned Social Scientists. , 1995 .

[37]  S. Hewitt,et al.  Systematic Touch Exploration as a Screening Procedure for Child Abuse: A Pilot Study. , 1994 .

[38]  Y. Orbach,et al.  Is Ongoing Feedback Necessary to Maintain The Quality of Investigative Interviews With Allegedly Abused Children? , 2002 .