The natural landscape metaphor in information visualization: The role of commonsense geomorphology

The landscape metaphor was one of the first methods used by the information visualization community to reorganize and depict document archives that are not inherently spatial. The motivation for the use of the landscape metaphor is that everyone intuitively understands landscapes. We critically examine the information visualization designer's ontologies for implementing spatialized landscapes with ontologies of the geographic domain held by lay people. In the second half of the article, we report on a qualitative study where we empirically assessed whether the landscape metaphor has explanatory power for users trying to make sense of spatialized views, and if so, in what ways. Specifically, we are interested in uncovering how lay people interpret hills and valleys in an information landscape, and whether their interpretation is congruent with the current scientific understanding of geomorphologic processes. Our empirical results suggest that neither developers' nor lay users' understanding of terrain visualizations is based on universal understanding of the true process that has shaped a natural landscape into hills and valleys, mountains, and canyons. Our findings also suggest that the information landscape metaphor for sense making of a document collection is not self-evident to lay users, as claimed by information landscape designers. While a deep understanding of geomorphology will probably not be required to successfully use an information landscape, we do suggest that a coherent theory on how people use space will be necessary to produce cognitively useful information visualizations. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  David M. Mark,et al.  Progress on Yindjibarndi Ethnophysiography , 2007, COSIT.

[2]  Werner Kuhn,et al.  Metaphors Create Theories For Users , 1993, COSIT.

[3]  Sara Irina Fabrikant,et al.  Cognitively Plausible Information Visualization , 2005 .

[4]  T. Ishikawa,et al.  Why Some Students Have Trouble with Maps and Other Spatial Representations , 2005 .

[5]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Bead: explorations in information visualization , 1992, SIGIR '92.

[6]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Using vision to think , 1999 .

[7]  D. Norman.  The psychology of everyday things , 1990 .

[8]  Jacques Bertin,et al.  Semiologie graphique : les diagrammes les réseaux, les cartes , 1969 .

[9]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Testing the First Law of Cognitive Geography on Point-Display Spatializations , 2003, COSIT.

[10]  Jürgen Döllner.  Geovisualization and Real-Time 3D Computer Graphics , 2005 .

[11]  Daniel R. Montello,et al.  Recall Memory for Topographic Maps and Natural Terrain: Effects of Experience and Task Performance , 1994 .

[12]  Jeffrey S. Torguson,et al.  Cartography: Thematic Map Design , 1990 .

[13]  Jock D. Mackinlay,et al.  The information visualizer, an information workspace , 1991, CHI.

[14]  Merideth Leigh Gattis,et al.  Spatial schemas and abstract thought , 2001 .

[15]  Stephen Kaplan,et al.  Environmental preference in a knowledge-seeking, knowledge-using organism. , 1992 .

[16]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Using a Landscape Methaphor to Represent a Corpus of Documents , 1993, COSIT.

[17]  Michael McCloskey,et al.  Naive physics: the curvilinear impetus principle and its role in interactions with moving objects , 1983 .

[18]  Kim J. Vicente,et al.  Local applications of the ecological approach to human-machine systems , 1995 .

[19]  James J. Thomas,et al.  Visualizing the non-visual: spatial analysis and interaction with information from text documents , 1995, Proceedings of Visualization 1995 Conference.

[20]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind , 1988 .

[21]  Steve Benford,et al.  Populated information terrains: first steps , 1995 .

[22]  W. Brewer,et al.  Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood , 1992, Cognitive Psychology.

[23]  Stephan Winter,et al.  Spatial Information Theory, 8th International Conference, COSIT 2007, Melbourne, Australia, September 19-23, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, COSIT.

[24]  Timothy Cribbin,et al.  Browsing a document collection represented in two- and three-dimensional virtual information space , 2005, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[25]  Flavia Sparacino.  City of News , 1999, SIGGRAPH '99.

[26]  Helen Couclelis,et al.  Worlds of Information: The Geographic Metaphor in the Visualization of Complex Information , 1998 .

[27]  Colin Ware,et al.  Visual Thinking for Design , 2008 .

[28]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live By , 1980 .

[29]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Information Visualization, Human-Computer Interaction, and Cognitive Psychology: Domain Visualizations , 2002, Visual Interfaces to Digital Libraries.

[30]  Sara Irina Fabrikant,et al.  Spatialization Methods: A Cartographic Research Agenda for Non-geographic Information Visualization , 2003 .

[31]  David M. Mark,et al.  Landscape Categories in Yindjibarndi: Ontology, Environment, and Language , 2003, COSIT.

[32]  Earl Rennison,et al.  Galaxy of news: an approach to visualizing and understanding expansive news landscapes , 1994, UIST '94.

[33]  Francis Harvey.  Transitions in U.S. Cartography and Geographic Information Science , 2003 .

[34]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Design Perspectives in Visualising Complex Information , 1997, VDB.

[35]  J. Gibson.  The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[36]  M. Minsky.  The Society of Mind , 1986 .

[37]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .

[38]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Visualizing knowledge domains , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[39]  R. Golledge,et al.  Spatial Behavior: A Geographic Perspective , 1996 .

[40]  Werner Kuhn,et al.  Spatialization: spatial metaphors for user interfaces , 1996, CHI Conference Companion.

[41]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Domain visualization using VxInsight® for science and technology management , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[42]  James A. Wise.  The ecological approach to text visualization , 1999 .

[43]  Barbara P. Buttenfield,et al.  Formalizing Semantic Spaces For Information Access , 2001 .

[44]  M. Dodge,et al.  Mapping Cyberspace , 2000 .

[45]  Mark L. Johnson.  The body in the mind: the bodily basis of meaning , 1987 .

[46]  Barry Smith,et al.  Do Mountains Exist? Towards an Ontology of Landforms , 2003 .

[47]  Elizabeth Keating,et al.  Spatial Conceptualizations of Social Hierarchy in Pohnpei, Micronesia , 1995, COSIT.

[48]  Sara Irina Fabrikant.  Evaluating the Usability of the Scale Metaphor for Querying Semantic Spaces , 2001, COSIT.

[49]  Andrea Scharnhorst.  Evolution in adaptive landscapes: Examples of science and technology development , 2000 .

[50]  John A. Mariani,et al.  Q-PIT: a populated information terrain , 1996, Electronic Imaging.

[51]  Y. Tuan,et al.  Topophilia: A Study of Environmental Perception, Attitudes and Values , 1976 .

[52]  John J. Bertin,et al.  The semiology of graphics , 1983 .

[53]  Sara Irina Fabrikant,et al.  Spatialized Browsing in Large Data Archives , 2000, Trans. GIS.

[54]  Bruce Hendrickson,et al.  Knowledge Mining With VxInsight: Discovery Through Interaction , 1998, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems.

[55]  G. Lakoff.  Women, fire, and dangerous things : what categories reveal about the mind , 1989 .

[56]  M. Goodchild,et al.  Geographic Information Systems and Science (second edition) , 2001 .

[57]  Patrick J. Hayes,et al.  The Naive Physics Manifesto , 1990, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[58]  Werner Kuhn,et al.  Spatial Information Theory. Foundations of Geographic Information Science , 2003, Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

[59]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  A City Metaphor to Support Navigation in Complex Information Spaces , 1998, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[60]  W. Tobler.  A Computer Movie Simulating Urban Growth in the Detroit Region , 1970 .