Understanding how webcasts are used as sources of information

Webcasting systems were developed to provide remote access in real-time to live events. Today, these systems have an additional requirement: to accommodate the “second life” of webcasts as archival information objects. Research to date has focused on facilitating the production and storage of webcasts as well as the development of more interactive and collaborative multimedia tools to support the event, but research has not examined how people interact with a webcasting system to access and use the contents of those archived events. Using an experimental design, this study examined how 16 typical users interact with a webcasting system to respond to a set of information tasks: selecting a webcast, searching for specific information, and making a gist of a webcast. Using several data sources that included user actions, user perceptions, and user explanations of their actions and decisions, the study also examined the strategies employed to complete the tasks. The results revealed distinctive system-use patterns for each task and provided insights into the types of tools needed to make webcasting systems better suited for also using the webcasts as information objects. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Robert Villa,et al.  FacetBrowser: a user interface for complex search tasks , 2008, ACM Multimedia.

[2]  Donald O. Case,et al.  Looking for Information: A Survey of Research on Information Seeking, Needs and Behavior , 2012 .

[3]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Video browsing interfaces for the open video project , 2002, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[4]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Implementation and Analysis of Several Keyframe-Based Browsing Interfaces to Digital Video , 2000, ECDL.

[5]  Elaine G. Toms,et al.  Developing a protocol for bioinformatics analysis: An integrated information behavior and task analysis approach: Research Articles , 2005 .

[6]  Elaine Toms,et al.  WiIRE: the Web interactive information retrieval experimentation system prototype , 2004, Inf. Process. Manag..

[7]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Task-based information searching , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Anoop Gupta,et al.  Browsing digital video , 2000, CHI.

[9]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Alternative Surrogates for Video Objects in a Digital Library: Users' Perspectives on Their Relative Usability , 2002, ECDL.

[10]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Previews and overviews in digital libraries: designing surrogates to support visual information seeking , 2000 .

[11]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Indexing, browsing, and searching of digital video , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  G. W. Furnas,et al.  Generalized fisheye views , 1986, CHI '86.

[13]  Elaine Toms,et al.  The effect of speech recognition accuracy rates on the usefulness and usability of webcast archives , 2006, CHI.

[14]  Elaine Toms,et al.  User strategies for handling information tasks in webcasts , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[15]  Charles Cole,et al.  The development of a diagnostic-prescriptive tool for undergraduates seeking information for a social science/humanities assignment. III. Enabling devices , 2000, Information Processing & Management.

[16]  Brian Christopher Smith,et al.  Passive capture and structuring of lectures , 1999, MULTIMEDIA '99.

[17]  Mark D. Apperley,et al.  Applying bifocal displays to topological maps , 1995, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..

[18]  Wolfgang Effelsberg,et al.  The Diver project: interactive digital video repurposing , 2004, IEEE MultiMedia.

[19]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Multimedia surrogates for video gisting: Toward combining spoken words and imagery , 2009, Inf. Process. Manag..

[20]  Michael G. Christel,et al.  Addressing the challenge of visual information access from digital image and video libraries , 2005, Proceedings of the 5th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries (JCDL '05).

[21]  John M. Gauch,et al.  The vision digital video library , 1997, Inf. Process. Manag..

[22]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Literacy as Multidimensional: Locating Information and Reading Comprehension , 1987 .

[23]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  A usage study of retrieval modalities for video shot retrieval , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[24]  William R. Hersh,et al.  A task-oriented approach to information retrieval evaluation , 1996 .

[25]  George Buchanan,et al.  Scalable browsing for large collections: a case study , 2000, DL '00.

[26]  Alex Cuthbert,et al.  Advanced technology for streamlining the creation of ePortfolio resources and dynamically-indexing digital library assets: a case study from the digital chemistry project , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[27]  Peter G. B. Enser,et al.  The evolution of visual information retrieval , 2008, J. Inf. Sci..

[28]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The Turn - Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context , 2005, The Kluwer International Series on Information Retrieval.

[29]  Peiling Wang,et al.  A cognitive model of document use during a research project. Study I. document selection , 1998 .

[30]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Integrating Meeting Capture within a Collaborative Team Environment , 2001, UbiComp.

[31]  Elaine Toms,et al.  The effect of task domain on search , 2003, CASCON.

[32]  Barry Arons,et al.  SpeechSkimmer: a system for interactively skimming recorded speech , 1997, TCHI.

[33]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Locating Information in Documents: Examination of a Cognitive Model. , 1988 .

[34]  Julia Hirschberg,et al.  SCAN: designing and evaluating user interfaces to support retrieval from speech archives , 1999, SIGIR '99.

[35]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study , 2001, J. Documentation.

[36]  Maria da Graça Campos Pimentel,et al.  Supporting multimedia capture in mobile computing environments through a peer-to-peer platform , 2008, SAC '08.

[37]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  Effects of audio and visual surrogates for making sense of digital video , 2007, CHI.

[38]  Abby Goodrum,et al.  Multidimensional scaling of video surrogates , 2001, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[39]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Changes in relevance criteria and problem stages in task performance , 2000, J. Documentation.

[40]  Alan F. Smeaton.  Techniques used and open challenges to the analysis, indexing and retrieval of digital video , 2007, Inf. Syst..

[41]  Kalervo Järvelin,et al.  Task complexity affects information seeking and use , 1995 .

[42]  Elaine Toms,et al.  Developing a protocol for bioinformatics analysis: An integrated information behavior and task analysis approach , 2005, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[43]  John T. Guthrie,et al.  Searching documents: Cognitive processes and deficits in understanding graphs, tables, and illustrations. , 1993 .

[44]  Steven E. Poltrock,et al.  A team collaboration space supporting capture and access of virtual meetings , 2001, GROUP.

[45]  Jamey Graham,et al.  The reader's helper: a personalized document reading environment , 1999, CHI '99.

[46]  S. Paris,et al.  Children's Metacognition About Reading: issues in Definition, Measurement, and Instruction , 1987 .

[47]  Leysia Palen,et al.  “I'll get that off the audio”: a case study of salvaging multimedia meeting records , 1997, CHI.

[48]  Shih-Fu Chang,et al.  A utility framework for the automatic generation of audio-visual skims , 2002, MULTIMEDIA '02.

[49]  Alan F. Smeaton,et al.  Design, implementation and testing of an interactive video retrieval system , 2003, MIR '03.

[50]  Gary Marchionini,et al.  The Open Video Digital Library , 2002, D Lib Mag..

[51]  Diane Harley,et al.  BIBS: A Lecture Webcasting System , 2001 .

[52]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  Classroom 2000: a system for capturing and accessing multimedia classroom experiences , 1998, CHI Conference Summary.