Breast cancer in Belarus and Ukraine after the Chernobyl accident

An increase in breast cancer incidence has been reported in areas of Belarus and Ukraine contaminated by the Chernobyl accident and has become an issue of public concern. The authors carried out an ecological epidemiological study to describe the spatial and temporal trends in breast cancer incidence in the most contaminated regions of Belarus and Ukraine, and to evaluate whether increases seen since 1986 correlate to radiation exposure from the Chernobyl accident. The authors investigated the trends through age‐cohort‐period‐region analyses of district‐specific incidence rates of breast cancer for Gomel and Mogilev regions of Belarus and Chernigiv, Kyiv and Zhytomir regions of Ukraine. Dose‐response analyses were based on Poisson regression, using average district‐specific whole body doses accumulated since the accident from external exposure and ingestion of long‐lived radionuclides. The study demonstrated increases in breast cancer incidence in all areas following the Chernobyl accident, reflecting improvements in cancer diagnosis and registration. In addition, a significant 2‐fold increase in risk was observed, during the period 1997–2001, in the most contaminated districts (average cumulative dose of 40.0 mSv or more) compared with the least contaminated districts (relative risk [RR] in Belarus 2.24, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.51–3.32 and in Ukraine 1.78, 95% CI = 1.08–2.93). The increase, though based on a relatively small number of cases, appeared approximately 10 years after the accident, was highest among women who were younger at the time of exposure and was observed for both localised and metastatic diseases. It is unlikely that this excess could be entirely due to the increased diagnostic activity in these areas. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Vasili S. Kazakov,et al.  Thyroid cancer after Chernobyl , 1992 .

[2]  M. Pike,et al.  A case-control interview study of breast cancer among Japanese A-bomb survivors. II. Interactions with radiation dose , 1994, Cancer Causes & Control.

[3]  N. Tronko,et al.  Childhood thyroid cancer since accident at Chernobyl , 1995, BMJ.

[4]  M H Skolnick,et al.  Systematic population-based assessment of cancer risk in first-degree relatives of cancer probands. , 1994, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  D. Gudbjartsson,et al.  Cancer as a Complex Phenotype: Pattern of Cancer Distribution within and beyond the Nuclear Family , 2004, PLoS medicine.

[6]  L. Anspaugh,et al.  CHERNOBYL ACCIDENT: RETROSPECTIVE AND PROSPECTIVE ESTIMATES OF EXTERNAL DOSE OF THE POPULATION OF UKRAINE , 2002, Health physics.

[7]  Z. Fedorenko,et al.  Cancer incidence in Ukraine after the Chernobyl accident , 2002 .

[8]  Elisabeth Cardis,et al.  Risk of thyroid cancer after exposure to 131I in childhood. , 2005, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[9]  J. Kaprio,et al.  Environmental and heritable factors in the causation of cancer--analyses of cohorts of twins from Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[10]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[11]  L. Anspaugh,et al.  Internal exposure from the ingestion of foods contaminated by 137Cs after the Chernobyl accident. Report 1. General model: ingestion doses and countermeasure effectiveness for the adults of Rovno Oblast of Ukraine. , 1996, Health physics.

[12]  岩崎 民子 SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[13]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  The ecological fallacy. , 1988, American journal of epidemiology.

[14]  J. Ferlay,et al.  Cancer Incidence in Five Continents , 1970, Union Internationale Contre Le Cancer / International Union against Cancer.

[15]  J. Waterhouse Cancer incidence in five continents, v.3 , 1976 .

[16]  K. Kopecky,et al.  Risk of Thyroid Cancer in the Bryansk Oblast of the Russian Federation after the Chernobyl Power Station Accident , 2004, Radiation research.

[17]  Douglas F. Easton,et al.  Polygenic susceptibility to breast cancer and implications for prevention , 2002, Nature Genetics.

[18]  H. Paretzke,et al.  Effective doses due to external irradiation from the Chernobyl accident for different population groups of Ukraine. , 1996, Health physics.

[19]  V. Beral,et al.  Thyroid cancer in the Ukraine , 1995, Nature.

[20]  R. Winkelmann Cancer registration techniques in the New Independent States of the former Soviet Union , 1998 .

[21]  S Greenland,et al.  Ecological bias, confounding, and effect modification. , 1989, International journal of epidemiology.

[22]  Erik Holmberg,et al.  Radiation Effects on Breast Cancer Risk: A Pooled Analysis of Eight Cohorts , 2002, Radiation research.

[23]  G. Pröhl,et al.  Internal exposure from the ingestion of foods contaminated by 137Cs after the Chernobyl accident--report 2. Ingestion doses of the rural population of Ukraine up to 12 y after the accident (1986-1997). , 2000, Health physics.