The Effect of Absorbable and Non-Absorbable Sutures on Nasal Width Following Cinch Sutures in Orthognathic Surgery

Background: Non-absorbable materials (nylon) are always used in cinch sutures to maintain nasal width and to improve harmonious facial symmetry in orthognathic surgery. However, a few drawbacks of nylon materials have been clinically reported following orthognathic surgery, such as nasal irritation and exposure of the sutures. An absorbable material (PDS) has been proposed in cinch sutures, not only to avoid the complications of nylon but also to stabilize the nasal width for a long-term follow-up. Methods: Fifty-seven patients with Angle’s malocclusion classification III receiving orthognathic surgery were enrolled in this study. A non-absorbable material (nylon) and an absorbable material (PDS) were utilized for the cinch sutures. Pre-operative (T1) and post-operative six-month (T2) craniofacial 3D images were collected for all patients to measure the alar curvature (Ac) width and the alar base (Al) width. A significance level of p < 0.05 was applied in the statistical analysis. Results: With the approval of IRB, cinch suturing was performed with nylon in 29 patients and with PDS in 28 patients. Pre-operative Ac and Al distances showed no significant difference between these two groups. There were also no significant differences between the suture materials in the peri-operative change in nasal width, including Ac (nylon: 1.999 ± 1.40; PDS: 1.484 ± 0.97; p = 0.112) and Al (nylon: 1.861 ± 1.66; PDS: 1.115 ± 0.92; p = 0.056). Conclusions: For cinch sutures in orthognathic surgery, PDS can maintain the peri-operative nasal width similarly to nylon; additionally, it can be absorbed in a timely manner without the drawbacks of non-absorbable materials.

[1]  Furkan Dindaroğlu,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of 3D stereophotogrammetry: A comparison to direct anthropometry and 2D photogrammetry. , 2016, Angle Orthodontist.

[2]  M. Shirazi,et al.  Randomized Comparison of Nylon Versus Absorbing Polyglactin 910 for Fascial Closure in Caesarean Section , 2014, Iranian Red Crescent medical journal.

[3]  Z. Panthaki,et al.  Nasolabial Aesthetics , 2007, The Journal of craniofacial surgery.

[4]  Millard Dr.  The alar cinch in the flat, flaring nose. , 1980 .

[5]  A. Kane,et al.  The role of Nasoalveolar molding: A 3D Prospective analysis , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[6]  A. Hohmann,et al.  Soft-tissue changes after maxillomandibular advancement surgery assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. , 2010, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  C. Steiner.  Cephalometrics for you and me , 1953 .

[8]  H. Rosen.  Lip-nasal aesthetics following Le Fort I osteotomy. , 1988, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[9]  L. Lo,et al.  Type of maxillary segment mobilization affects three-dimensional nasal morphology. , 2020, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[10]  Murad Alam,et al.  Frequency of Use of Suturing and Repair Techniques Preferred by Dermatologic Surgeons , 2006, Dermatologic surgery : official publication for American Society for Dermatologic Surgery [et al.].

[11]  S. Chauhan,et al.  Improved outcomes of scar revision with the use of polydioxanone suture in comparison to polyglactin 910: A randomized controlled trial. , 2018, Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS.

[12]  K. Vig,et al.  Changes in the nasal and labial soft tissues after surgical repositioning of the maxilla. , 1989, The International journal of adult orthodontics and orthognathic surgery.

[13]  A. Wahab,et al.  Comparison between the classical and a modified trans-septal technique of alar cinching for Le Fort I osteotomies: a prospective randomized controlled trial. , 2013, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[14]  Yurong Chen,et al.  Long-term outcomes of bimaxillary surgery for treatment of asymmetric skeletal class III deformity using surgery-first approach , 2018, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[15]  L. Sandvik,et al.  Three-year follow-up of bimaxillary surgery to correct skeletal Class III malocclusion: stability and risk factors for relapse. , 2011, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[16]  M. Sajid,et al.  A systematic review on the effectiveness of slowly-absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for abdominal fascial closure following laparotomy. , 2011, International journal of surgery.

[17]  T. Muto,et al.  The stability of an alar cinch suture after Le Fort I and mandibular osteotomies in Japanese patients with Class III malocclusions. , 2012, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[18]  F. Naini,et al.  Long-term stability of limiting nasal alar base width changes with a cinch suture following Le Fort I osteotomy with submental intubation. , 2017, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[19]  R. Brownlee.  Anthropometry of the head and neck, 2nd ed. Edited by Leslie G. Farkas, Raven Press, New York, 1994, 427 pp, $145.00 , 1995 .

[20]  L. Lo,et al.  Patient- and 3D morphometry-based nose outcomes after skeletofacial reconstruction , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[21]  E. Ko,et al.  Effects of two alar base suture techniques suture techniques on nasolabial changes after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery in Taiwanese patients with class III malocclusions. , 2015, International journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery.

[22]  T. Won,et al.  Rhinoplasty in the Asian Patient. , 2016, Clinics in plastic surgery.

[23]  Thomas J J Maal,et al.  Registration of 3-dimensional facial photographs for clinical use. , 2010, Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons.

[24]  Cecil C. Steiner,et al.  Cephalometrics In Clinical Practice , 2009 .

[25]  A. Stewart,et al.  Efficacy and stability of the alar base cinch suture. , 2011, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[26]  C. Simms,et al.  Torsion of monofilament and polyfilament sutures under tension decreases suture strength and increases risk of suture fracture. , 2012, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[27]  Songsong Zhu,et al.  Modified versus classic alar base sutures after LeFort I osteotomy: a systematic review. , 2014, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology and oral radiology.

[28]  M. de Moraes,et al.  Comparative analysis of two different alar base sutures after Le Fort I osteotomy: randomized double-blind controlled trial. , 2011, Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, oral radiology, and endodontics.

[29]  M. Santagata,et al.  Comparison of two techniques of cinch suturing to avoid widening of the base of the nose after Le Fort I osteotomy. , 2010, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.

[30]  Use of the alar base cinch suture in Le Fort I osteotomy: is it effective? , 2011, The British journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery.