Handheld Visual Representation of a Castle Chapel Ruin

We have experienced rapid development in Augmented Reality (AR) systems and platforms in the world of cultural heritage, namely in cultural settings and historical museums. However, we still face a range of challenges to design an AR system that meets the requirements for an AR installation working autonomously in a cultural heritage setting for an extended duration. This article describes the development of two installations for the visualization of a 3D reconstruction of a castle chapel, running autonomously during open hours in the location of a castle museum. We present a convincing 3D visualization running at interactive frame-rates on modern tablets. In one installation, the tablet is connected to a large screen TV for an immersive experience, and, in another, the tablet is hand-held, thus facilitating translational freedom in the chapel. Both installations allow unsupervised usage during museum visiting hours. Based on in-field observations and on-device logging of application usage, user behavior is analyzed and evaluated. Results indicate that users spent a limited amount of time using the application and did not fully explore the visual area of the chapel. In order for the user to spend more time with the application, additional information must be presented to the user.

[1]  Hans-Werner Gellersen,et al.  Substitutional Reality: Using the Physical Environment to Design Virtual Reality Experiences , 2015, CHI.

[2]  Daniel Pletinckx,et al.  Presenting a monument in restoration: the Saint Laurentius church in Ename and its role in the Francia Media heritage initiative , 2001, VAST '01.

[3]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Enticing People to Interact with Large Public Displays in Public Spaces , 2003, INTERACT.

[4]  Ernesto Damiani,et al.  Augmented reality technologies, systems and applications , 2010, Multimedia Tools and Applications.

[5]  Dieter Schmalstieg,et al.  Experiences with Handheld Augmented Reality , 2007, 2007 6th IEEE and ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[6]  Areti Damala,et al.  Bridging the gap between the digital and the physical: design and evaluation of a mobile augmented reality guide for the museum visit , 2008, DIMEA.

[7]  Jan Torpus,et al.  lifeClipper3 — An augmented walking experience field evaluation of an experience design approach for immersive outdoor augmented reality , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Arts, Media, and Humanities.

[8]  Sylaiou Styliani,et al.  Virtual museums, a survey and some issues for consideration , 2009 .

[9]  Matthias Trapp,et al.  Communication of Digital Cultural Heritage in Public Spaces by the Example of Roman Cologne , 2010, EuroMed.

[10]  Claus B. Madsen,et al.  An interactive visualization of the past using a situated simulation approach , 2013, 2013 Digital Heritage International Congress (DigitalHeritage).

[11]  Eva Hornecker,et al.  “I don’t understand it either, but it is cool” - visitor interactions with a multi-touch table in a museum , 2008, 2008 3rd IEEE International Workshop on Horizontal Interactive Human Computer Systems.

[12]  Thomas P. Kersten.  3D Scanning and Modelling of the Bismarck Monument by Terrestrial Laser Scanning for Integration into a 3D City Model of Hamburg , 2010, EuroMed.

[13]  Gunnar Liestøl,et al.  Mobile innovation: designing and evaluating situated simulations , 2011, Digit. Creativity.

[14]  Mark Billinghurst,et al.  Augmenting the science centre and museum experience , 2004, GRAPHITE '04.

[15]  Xiangyu Wang,et al.  Interactive Antarctica: a museum installation based on an augmented reality system , 2008, DIMEA.

[16]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Virtualized Reality: Constructing Virtual Worlds from Real Scenes , 1997, IEEE Multim..

[17]  John Krogstie,et al.  Mobile augmented reality for cultural heritage: A technology acceptance study , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR).

[18]  Gabriele Guidi,et al.  Reality-Based and Reconstructive models: Digital Media for Cultural Heritage Valorization , 2011 .

[19]  M. Sheelagh T. Carpendale,et al.  Gestures in the wild: studying multi-touch gesture sequences on interactive tabletop exhibits , 2011, CHI.

[20]  D. Pletinckx,et al.  An Augmented Reality Presentation System for Remote Cultural Heritage Sites , 2009 .

[21]  Volker Scholz,et al.  An Augmented Reality museum guide , 2008, 2008 7th IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality.

[22]  Gunnar Liestøl,et al.  Situated Simulations Between Virtual Reality and Mobile Augmented Reality: Designing a Narrative Space , 2011, Handbook of Augmented Reality.

[23]  Anne Bationo Tillon,et al.  Mobile augmented reality in the museum: Can a lace-like technology take you closer to works of art? , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Arts, Media, and Humanities.

[24]  Despina Michael,et al.  Comparative Study of Interactive Systems in a Museum , 2010, EuroMed.

[25]  Timo Engelke,et al.  The House of Olbrich — An Augmented Reality tour through architectural history , 2011, 2011 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Arts, Media, and Humanities.

[26]  C. B. Madsen,et al.  Aspects of what makes or breaks a museum AR experience , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Arts, Media, and Humanities (ISMAR-AMH).

[27]  Mirjam P Eladhari.  Semi-Autonomous Avatars in Games , 2010, IVA 2010.

[28]  Wim van Eck,et al.  The augmented painting: Playful interaction with multi-spectral images , 2012, 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality - Arts, Media, and Humanities (ISMAR-AMH).

[29]  Anton Leuski,et al.  Ada and Grace: Toward Realistic and Engaging Virtual Museum Guides , 2010, IVA.