Using Vertically Integrated Projects to embed research-based education for sustainable development in undergraduate curricula

Purpose This paper aims to share the University of Strathclyde’s experience of embedding research-based education for sustainable development (RBESD) within its undergraduate curricula through the use of an innovative pedagogy called Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP), originated at Georgia Institute of Technology. Design/methodology/approach This paper discusses how aligning VIP with the SDG framework presents a powerful means of combining both research-based education (RBE) and education for sustainable development (ESD), and in effect embedding RBESD in undergraduate curricula. Findings The paper reports on the University of Strathclyde’s practice and experience of establishing their VIP for Sustainable Development programme and presents a reflective account of the challenges faced in the programme implementation and those envisaged as the programme scales up across a higher education institution (HEI). Research limitations/implications The paper is a reflective account of the specific challenges encountered at Strathclyde to date after a successful pilot, which was limited in its scale. While it is anticipated these challenges may resonate with other HEIs, there will also be some bespoke challenges that may not be discussed here. Practical implications This paper offers a practical and scalable method of integrating SDG research and research-based education within undergraduate curricula. Social implications The paper has the potential to deliver SDG-related impact in target communities by linking research-based teaching and learning with community outreach. Originality/value The alignment of VIP with the SDG research area is novel, with no other FE institutions currently using this approach to embed SDG research-based teaching within their curricula. Furthermore, the interdisciplinary feature of the VIP programme, which is critical for SDG research, is a Strathclyde enhancement of the original model.

[1]  George D. Kuh.  High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter , 2008 .

[2]  Ruth Pilkington,et al.  Developing undergraduate research and inquiry , 2010 .

[3]  Jan P. Allebach,et al.  The Vertically Integrated Projects (Vip) Program In Ece At Purdue: Fully Integrating Undergraduate Education And Graduate Research , 2006 .

[4]  James Paul Holloway,et al.  Experiential Learning Programs for the Future of Engineering Education , 2010, 2010 IEEE Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments.

[5]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[6]  James V. Krogmeier,et al.  The Social Web of Engineering Education: Knowledge Exchange in Integrated Project Teams , 2012 .

[7]  Dilly Fung,et al.  A Connected Curriculum for Higher Education , 2017 .

[8]  Edward J. Coyle,et al.  Long Term Community Service Projects In The Purdue Engineering Curriculum , 1996 .

[9]  Dai Hounsell.  Understanding Teaching and Teaching for Understanding , 1997 .

[10]  K. Bruffee.  Collaborative Learning: Higher Education, Interdependence, and the Authority of Knowledge , 1995 .

[11]  Edward J. Coyle,et al.  Diversity and Student Persistence in the Vertically Integrated Project (VIP) Course Sequence , 2018 .

[12]  D. Hounsell.  The Experience of Learning: Implications for Teaching and Studying in Higher Education , 1997 .

[13]  Larry Hirst,et al.  Transforming Engineering Education: Creating Interdisciplinary Skills for Complex Global Environments , 2010 .

[14]  Edward J. Coyle,et al.  Vertically Integrated Projects (VIP) Programs at International Institutions: Multidisciplinary Projects with Homes in Any Discipline , 2017 .

[15]  William C. Oakes,et al.  2005 Bernard M. Gordon Prize Lecture * : Integrating Engineering Education and Community Service: Themes for the Future of Engineering Education , 2006 .

[16]  R. Griffiths.  Knowledge production and the research–teaching nexus: the case of the built environment disciplines , 2004 .

[17]  Janet Moore,et al.  Is Higher Education Ready for Transformative Learning? , 2005 .

[18]  Jan H. F. Meyer,et al.  Threshold concepts and troublesome knowledge (2): Epistemological considerations and a conceptual framework for teaching and learning , 2005 .