Transient Responses of Various Ammonia Formation Catalyst Configurations for Passive SCR in Lean-Burning Gasoline Engines under Various Real Engine Conditions

Passive selective catalyst reduction (SCR) systems can be used as aftertreatment systems for lean burn spark ignition (SI)-engines. Their operation is based on the interaction between the engine, an ammonia formation catalyst (AFC), and an SCR catalyst. Under rich conditions the AFC forms ammonia, which is stored in the SCR catalyst. Under lean conditions, the SCR catalyst reduces the engine out NOx using the stored NH3. This study compared the ammonia production and response times of a standard three way catalyst (TWC) and a Pd/Al2O3 catalyst under realistic engine operating conditions. In addition, the relationships between selected engine operating parameters and ammonia formation over a TWC were investigated, considering the influence of both the chosen load point and the engine settings. Tests at the loadpoint of 1500 rpm/2.63 bar break mean effective pressure (BMEP) showed that most ammonia was formed over a TWC at a lambda of 0.93 with a 50% mass fraction burned (MFB) at 3 crank angle degrees (CAD) after top dead centre (aTDC), when valve overlap was minimised. The response time of the TWC during transitions from rich to lean operation was evaluated at various loadpoints, showing that the TWC responded most rapidly at higher loadpoints, mainly due to the higher flow through the catalyst. Furthermore it was noted that at 1750 rpm/8.00 bar BMEP, ammonia formation decreased over time due to high in-catalyst temperatures. A comparison between the TWC and Pd/Al2O3 catalyst showed that the latter produced ammonia faster than the TWC catalyst at 1500 rpm/2.63 bar BMEP. Furthermore the yield was more than 50% lower compared to the TWC.

[1]  James E. Parks,et al.  Passive-ammonia selective catalytic reduction (SCR): Understanding NH3 formation over close-coupled three way catalysts (TWC) , 2014 .

[2]  Wei Li,et al.  Passive Ammonia SCR System for Lean-burn SIDI Engines , 2010 .

[3]  Naoto Miyoshi,et al.  Development of New Concept Three-Way Catalyst for Automotive Lean-Burn Engines , 1995 .

[4]  O. Deutschmann,et al.  Kinetics of the water-gas shift reaction over Rh/Al2O3 catalysts , 2014 .

[5]  John B. Heywood,et al.  Internal combustion engine fundamentals , 1988 .

[6]  Jae-Soon Choi,et al.  Ammonia reactions with the stored oxygen in a commercial lean NOx trap catalyst , 2015 .

[7]  J. Theis Selective Catalytic Reduction for Treating the NOx Emissions from Lean-Burn Gasoline Engines: Durability Assessment , 2008 .

[8]  C. DiMaggio,et al.  Dual SCR Aftertreatment for Lean NOx Reduction , 2009 .

[9]  S. Oh,et al.  Reaction pathways and mechanism for ammonia formation and removal over palladium-based three-way catalysts: Multiple roles of CO , 2014 .

[10]  P. Bielaczyc,et al.  Chassis Dynamometer Testing of Ammonia Emissions from Light-Duty SI Vehicles in the Context of Emissions of Reactive Nitrogen Compounds , 2013 .

[11]  Milica Folic,et al.  Ammonia formation over supported platinum and palladium catalysts , 2015 .

[12]  Jeong Kim,et al.  Passive TWC+SCR Systems for Satisfying Tier 2, Bin 2 Emission Standards on Lean-Burn Gasoline Engines , 2015 .

[13]  Guy Richard Chandler,et al.  The Use of Palladium in Advanced Catalysts , 1995 .

[14]  Jae-Soon Choi,et al.  Spatiotemporal distribution of NOx storage and impact on NH3 and N2O selectivities during lean/rich cycling of a Ba-based lean NOx trap catalyst , 2012 .

[15]  James E. Parks,et al.  Ammonia Generation over TWC for Passive SCR NOX Control for Lean Gasoline Engines , 2014 .

[16]  Piotr Bielaczyc,et al.  A Comparison of Ammonia Emission Factors from Light-Duty Vehicles Operating on Gasoline, Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) and Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) , 2012 .