Stem bending force and hydraulic system pressure sensing for predicting napiergrass yield during harvesting

A 'look-ahead' stem-bending yield sensor was developed for napiergrass.Stem-bending sensor performed better than pressures of harvester hydraulic drives.Stem-bending yield sensor predicted yield with 85-90% accuracy.Stem-bending sensor showed potential to control harvester ground speed. Napiergrass, which resembles sugarcane in stature and cultivation practices, is emerging as a candidate bioenergy crop. However, limited studies investigating harvesting and yield sensing of napiergrass are available. This study investigated stem-bending force, and the hydraulic pressures of basecutter, chopper and elevator drives in a John Deere 3522 sugarcane billet harvester as indicators of napiergrass yield. The coefficients of determination (R2) between napiergrass yield and hydraulic pressures were 0.73, 0.88 and 0.81, respectively for the basecutter, chopper and elevator drives. The highest correlation (R2=0.92) was found between stem-bending force and napiergrass yield. The yield prediction errors were 4.9% and 8.6% for the calibration and validation plots with the stem-bending force yield sensor. Cross-validation, in which each harvested row was treated as a data point, showed that the average yield prediction errors were 10.9% and 11.8% for the calibration and validation data sets. Yield maps were also generated employing the stem-bending yield sensor. In addition, it was expected that the stem-bending yield sensor could be utilized to control harvester operation such as travel speed. Further studies would be needed to extend the stem-bending concept to other thick stemmed crops.

[1]  R. K. Hubbard,et al.  Low-Input Production of Biomass from Perennial Grasses in the Coastal Plain of Georgia, USA , 2011, BioEnergy Research.

[2]  M. Wachendorf,et al.  Assessment of forage mass from grassland swards by height measurement using an ultrasonic sensor , 2011 .

[3]  Karl Wild,et al.  Evaluation of Parameters for Yield Measurement of Grass in a Mower Conditioner , 2007 .

[4]  Tony E Grift,et al.  Cutting energy characteristics of Miscanthus x giganteus stems with varying oblique angle and cutting speed , 2012 .

[5]  Milan Kroulík,et al.  Development and evaluation of forage yield measure sensors in a mowing-conditioning machine , 2007 .

[6]  Qin Zhang,et al.  Biomechanical properties of Miscanthus stems. , 2012 .

[7]  Karl Wild,et al.  Local Yield Detection of Grass in a Mower Conditioner , 2005 .

[8]  W. Anderson,et al.  Sugarcane, Energy Cane and Napier Grass , 2014 .

[9]  Randy R. Price,et al.  Fiber Optic Yield Monitor for a Sugarcane Harvester , 2011 .

[10]  Alan Christopher Hansen,et al.  Harvesting System Design and Performance , 2014 .

[11]  Ning Wang,et al.  AdaBoost classifiers for pecan defect classification , 2011 .

[12]  Kuan Chong Ting,et al.  Sensing Miscanthus Stem Bending Force for Maximizing Throughput Rate in a Disk Mower-Conditioner , 2014 .

[13]  P. Savoie,et al.  Evaluation of Five Sensors to Estimate Mass-Flow Rate and Moisture of Grass in a Forage Harvester , 2002 .

[14]  R. C. Fluck,et al.  Harvesting operations and energetics of tall grasses for biomass energy production: a case study. , 1992 .

[15]  Kuan Chong Ting,et al.  Sensing Miscanthus Swath Volume for Maximizing Baler Throughput Rate , 2014 .

[16]  Randy R. Price,et al.  Sugar cane yield monitoring system , 2001 .

[17]  Douglas L Karlen.  Cellulosic energy cropping systems , 2014 .

[18]  Bharat P. Singh.  Biofuel Crops: Production, Physiology and Genetics , 2013 .

[19]  Kevin J. Shinners,et al.  PRECISION AGRICULTURE AS APPLIED TO NORTH AMERICAN HAY AND FORAGE PRODUCTION , 2003 .