Volatile Policy and Private Information: The Case of Monetary Shocks

In this paper we study how volatility in monetary policy affects economic performance in the presence of endogenously chosen information structures. To isolate the effects produced by the interaction of uncertainty in monetary policy and (possibly) asymmetric information, we consider a model in which in the absence of either one of these features the equilibrium would be efficient. The equilibria that we find, with volatility and asymmetry of information, are inefficient for two reasons: first, in some cases, economic agents fail to trade, even though it is always efficient to do so; second, to capture the rents associated with being informed, agents spend resources acquiring socially useless information. Thus, in addition to the more standard effects of volatile inflation, our model calls attention to two types of costs associated with monetary uncertainty: the cost of not trading, and the cost of allocating resources to wasteful activities. The model implies that if monetary policy is not volatile all agents are symmetrically informed and hence, the outcome is efficient. Alternatively, making policy transparent,' i.e guaranteeing that all agents share the same information, serves the same purpose.

[1]  Pierre-Daniel G. Sarte,et al.  Inflation Uncertainty and Growth in a Simple Monetary Model , 1997 .

[2]  M. Tommasi Inflation and Relative Prices Evidence from Argentina , 1992 .

[3]  Geoffrey H. Moore,et al.  The National Bureau of Economic Research , 1950 .

[4]  Optimal Monetary Impulse-Response Functions in a Matching Model , 1999 .

[5]  Paul Gomme Money and growth revisited , 1993 .

[6]  William R. Easterly,et al.  Inflation Crises and Long-Run Growth , 1995 .

[7]  R. Lucas Expectations and the neutrality of money , 1972 .

[8]  Randall Wright,et al.  Barter and monetary exchange under private information , 1991 .

[9]  Costas Azariadis,et al.  Private information, money, and growth: Indeterminacy, fluctuations, and the Mundell-Tobin effect , 1996 .

[10]  R. Varga,et al.  Proof of Theorem 4 , 1983 .

[11]  William Samuelson Bargaining under Asymmetric Information. , 1984 .

[12]  Michael Suk-Young Chwe,et al.  The Reeded Edge and the Phillips Curve: Money Neutrality, Common Knowledge, and Subjective Beliefs☆ , 1999 .

[13]  J. Bullard,et al.  The long-run relationship between inflation and output in postwar economies☆ , 1995 .

[14]  Stanley Fischer,et al.  Growth, Macroeconomics, and Development , 1991, NBER Macroeconomics Annual.

[15]  Leonard M. Adleman,et al.  Proof of proposition 3 , 1992 .

[16]  Neil Wallace,et al.  Short‐Run and Long‐Run Effects of Changes in Money in a Random‐Matching Model , 1997, Journal of Political Economy.

[17]  Thomas F. Cooley,et al.  The Inflation Tax in a Real Business Cycle Model , 1988 .

[18]  S. Fischer,et al.  NBER Macroeconomics Annual 1990 , 1990 .

[19]  Saul Lach,et al.  The Behavior of Prices and Inflation: An Empirical Analysis of Disaggregat Price Data , 1992, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  A. Casella,et al.  Economic Exchange During Hyperinflation , 1990, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  V. Chari,et al.  The growth effects of monetary policy , 1995 .

[22]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Analysis of Two Bargaining Problems with Incomplete Information , 1983 .

[23]  X. Sala-i-Martin,et al.  A Growth Model of Inflation, Tax Evasion, and Financial Repression , 1992 .

[24]  J. Stiglitz The market for 'lemons': quality uncertainty and the market mechanism , 2002 .

[25]  R. Barro,et al.  Inflation and Economic Growth , 1995 .

[26]  E. Sheshinski,et al.  Optimal Pricing, Inflation, and the Cost of Price Adjustment , 1993 .

[27]  A. Roth Game-Theoretic Models of Bargaining , 1987 .

[28]  Real Effects of Monetary Shocks in an Economy with Sequential Purchases , 1993 .