Automated visualization of concrete bridge deck condition from GPR data

Abstract Ground-penetrating radar (GPR) is one of the most commonly used technologies for condition assessment of concrete bridge decks. However, there have been no fully automated algorithms to visualize the data collected with this technique. In such context, the current paper presents a method for a full automation of GPR data visualization and analysis. Based on the background removal, depth correction, synthetic aperture focusing technique (SAFT), and interpolation algorithms, this automated method produces a plan view map of amplitude of GPR signals. In the obtained map, two types of information are observed at the same time. First, as the strongest reflectors of electromagnetic energy, rebars will appear as the most visible. Second, the areas of corrosive environment and, thus, likely corrosion, will be detected as having low amplitude rebar reflections. As a proof of concept, the proposed method was implemented for two bare concrete bridge decks and two concrete bridge decks with asphalt overlays. In all cases, the results obtained were excellent where the maps pinpointed the areas affected by corrosion. These areas were confirmed by other methods of evaluation, such as electrical resistivity (ER), half-cell potential (HCP), chloride analysis of core samples, or visual inspection. With the demonstrated performance, the proposed method is expected to be an excellent alternative to the available methods of GPR data evaluation and visualization. In the future, it should be improved to provide an indication of corrosion severity/probability at each deck location.

[1]  G. Glass,et al.  The presentation of the chloride threshold level for corrosion of steel in concrete , 1997 .

[2]  Seong-Jun Cho,et al.  Removal of ringing noise in GPR data by signal processing , 2007 .

[3]  Enes Yigit,et al.  A Review on Migration Methods in B-Scan Ground Penetrating Radar Imaging , 2014 .

[4]  C. R. Carter,et al.  Impulse radar evaluation of asphalt-covered bridge decks , 1992 .

[5]  Soheil Nazarian,et al.  Nondestructive testing to identify concrete bridge deck deterioration , 2012 .

[6]  Alexander Dillhöfer,et al.  Synthetic Aperture Focusing and Time-of-Flight Diffraction Ultrasonic Imaging—Past and Present , 2012 .

[7]  Kristin J. Dana,et al.  Automated GPR Rebar Analysis for Robotic Bridge Deck Evaluation , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Cybernetics.

[8]  Nenad Gucunski,et al.  Migration-based automated rebar picking for condition assessment of concrete bridge decks with ground penetrating radar , 2018, NDT & E International.

[9]  Tarek Zayed,et al.  Method for Analyzing Time-Series GPR Data of Concrete Bridge Decks , 2015 .

[10]  Michael Berger,et al.  Synthetic aperture focusing technique signal processing , 1986 .

[11]  Tarek Zayed,et al.  Clustering-Based Threshold Model for Condition Assessment of Concrete Bridge Decks with Ground-Penetrating Radar , 2015 .

[12]  Alexander Tarussov,et al.  Condition assessment of concrete structures using a new analysis method: Ground-penetrating radar computer-assisted visual interpretation , 2013 .

[13]  Carl Rascoe,et al.  3D-Gpr In Transportation Infrastructure Evaluation , 2008 .

[14]  Jinyoung Kim,et al.  Understanding depth-amplitude effects in assessment of GPR data from concrete bridge decks , 2016 .

[15]  Francesco Soldovieri,et al.  Processing strategies for high-resolution GPR concrete inspections , 2010 .

[16]  Ralf Birken,et al.  Quantifying Bridge Deck Corrosion Using Ground Penetrating Radar , 2016 .

[17]  Carey M. Rappaport,et al.  Synthetic aperture imaging for flaw detection in a concrete medium , 2012 .

[18]  Christopher L. Barnes,et al.  EFFECTIVENESS OF GROUND PENETRATING RADAR IN PREDICTING DECK REPAIR QUANTITIES , 2004 .

[19]  Martin Krause,et al.  Ultrasonic Imaging of Concrete Elements Using Reconstruction by Synthetic Aperture Focusing Technique , 2003 .

[20]  Jinyoung Kim,et al.  Capture and Quantification of Deterioration Progression in Concrete Bridge Decks through Periodical NDE Surveys , 2017 .

[21]  Jingang Yi,et al.  RABIT: implementation, performance validation and integration with other robotic platforms for improved management of bridge decks , 2017, International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications.

[22]  Boris Milmann,et al.  Ultrasonic Imaging Methods for Investigation of Post-tensioned Concrete Structures: A Study of Interfaces at Artificial Grouting Faults and Its Verification , 2008 .

[23]  Nenad Gucunski,et al.  An algorithm for automatic localization and detection of rebars from GPR data of concrete bridge decks , 2018 .

[24]  U S Khan,et al.  Background removal from GPR data using Eigenvalues , 2010, Proceedings of the XIII Internarional Conference on Ground Penetrating Radar.

[25]  MengChu Zhou,et al.  Automatic Detection of Bridge Deck Condition From Ground Penetrating Radar Images , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering.

[26]  Nenad Gucunski,et al.  Understanding Multi-modal Non-destructive Testing Data Through the Evaluation of Twelve Deteriorating Reinforced Concrete Bridge Decks , 2015 .

[27]  Jinyoung Kim,et al.  Method for attenuation assessment of GPR data from concrete bridge decks , 2017 .

[28]  Christopher L. Barnes,et al.  Improved concrete bridge deck evaluation using GPR by accounting for signal depth–amplitude effects , 2008 .

[29]  Kyle Hoegh,et al.  Ultrasonic Tomography for Evaluation of Concrete Pavements , 2011 .