What are shaping the ethical bottom line?: Identifying factors influencing young readers' acceptance of digital news photo alteration

While most research on digital ethics has focused on professional codes or case studies in manipulation, there has been little formal research on what the readers thinks about what is and what is not visually ethical in a digital age. This study examines what affect young readers' acceptance or rejection of digital alteration of news images. The major finding is that the perceived prevalence of photo alteration, media credibility, and personal Photoshop use and knowledge are the major influencers of "non-professional" standards of acceptance of photo alteration. The study implies the necessity of intervention from scholars, media professionals, and ethical activists to discuss photo alteration and advocate ethical standards for it.

[1]  James D. Kelly,et al.  Going Digital at College Newspapers: The Impact of Photo Credibility and Work Routines. , 1996 .

[2]  Jennifer D. Greer,et al.  How much is too much? , 2002 .

[3]  Shiela Reaves.  Digital Alteration of Photographs in Consumer Magazines , 1991 .

[4]  Stevie Watson,et al.  Ethical Responses to Public Allegations of Skin Tone Manipulation in Print Advertising: Consumer Indifference or Consumer Concern? , 2011 .

[5]  Ralph D. Berenger.  Introduction: War in Cyberspace , 2006, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[6]  Alain Jaubert,et al.  Making People Disappear: An Amazing Chronicle of Photographic Deception , 1989 .

[7]  Matt Carlson,et al.  THE REALITY OF A FAKE IMAGE News norms, photojournalistic craft, and Brian Walski's fabricated photograph , 2009 .

[8]  James E. Kelly,et al.  Digital Imaging & Believing Photos , 1994 .

[9]  Shiela Reaves,et al.  The Vulnerable Image: Categories of Photos as Predictor of Digital Manipulation , 1995 .

[10]  Shahira S Fahmy,et al.  Passing the “Breakfast Test”: Exploring the Effects of Varying Degrees of Graphicness of War Photography in the New Media Environment , 2011 .

[11]  David D. Perlmutter,et al.  Commentary: In the Visual-Digital World, Taking Seriously the Once-Prosaic “Home Mode” , 2013 .

[12]  A A Bartholomew,et al.  Code of Ethics , 1992, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[13]  Les Gasser,et al.  An activity theoretic model for information quality change , 2008, First Monday.

[14]  George Albert Gladney,et al.  Cross‐media response to digital manipulation of still and moving images , 1996 .

[15]  David D. Perlmutter,et al.  (In)visible evidence: pictorially enhanced disbelief in the Apollo moon landings , 2008 .

[16]  Janne-Tuomas Seppänen,et al.  IMAGINARY DARKROOM , 2010 .

[17]  Adam Clayton Powell.  Satellite imagery: The ethics of a new technology , 1998 .

[18]  Edgar Huang,et al.  Readers' Perception of Digital Alteration in Photojournalism , 2001 .

[19]  Dino A. Brugioni.  Photo Fakery: The History and Techniques of Photographic Deception and Manipulation , 1999 .

[20]  P. Rao.  Statistical Research Methods in the Life Sciences , 1997 .

[21]  Michael F. Young,et al.  Does Moral Judgment Go Offline When Students Are Online? A Comparative Analysis of Undergraduates' Beliefs and Behaviors Related to Conventional and Digital Cheating , 2007 .

[22]  Scott B. Fosdick,et al.  Epistemic honesty and the default assumption that photos are true , 2007 .

[23]  Wilson Lowrey,et al.  Normative Conflict in the Newsroom: The Case of Digital Photo Manipulation , 2003 .

[24]  Dawn Mercedes.  Digital Ethics: Computers, Photographs, and the Manipulation of Pixels , 1996 .

[25]  Sandra L. Borden,et al.  Choice processes in a newspaper ethics case , 1997 .

[26]  Arie L. Stavchansky.  Acquiring knowledge of digital video manipulation techniques and its effect on the perceived credibility of television news , 2007 .

[27]  Don Slater,et al.  Making Things Real , 2002 .

[28]  Shiela Reaves.  Magazines Newspapers: Editors Have Different Ethical Standards on the Digital Manipulation of Photographs , 1995 .

[29]  F. Kerlinger,et al.  Foundations of behavioral research : educational and psychological inquiry , 1966 .

[30]  Carol B. Schwalbe,et al.  “Secret” Casualties: Images of Injury and Death in the Iraq War Across Media Platforms , 2008 .

[31]  Sung-Yeon Park,et al.  If Looks Could Kill: Digital Manipulation of Fashion Models , 2004 .

[32]  Nikki B. Usher.  Reviewing Fauxtography: A Blog-driven Challenge to Mass Media Power without the Promises of Networked Publicity , 2008, First Monday.

[33]  David D. Perlmutter,et al.  Photojournalism and Foreign Policy: Icons of Outrage in International Crises , 1998 .

[34]  Yung Soo Kim,et al.  Public Reactions toward an Ethical Dilemma Faced by Photojournalists: Examining the Conflict between Acting as a Dispassionate Observer and Acting as a “Good Samaritan” , 2010 .

[35]  Andrew F. Hayes,et al.  Statistical Methods for Communication Science , 2005 .

[36]  Thomas H. Wheeler.  Phototruth Or Photofiction?: Ethics and Media Imagery in the Digital Age , 2002 .

[37]  Edward Spence,et al.  Information Ethics as a Guide for New Media , 2008 .

[38]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Solutions Manual and Supplementary Materials for Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data , 2003 .

[39]  John Russial,et al.  Digital Imaging Skills and the Hiring and Training of Photojournalists , 1998 .