Experimental Validation of Contact Dynamics Simulation of Constrained Robotic Tasks

Dynamics simulation plays a key role in the design, verification, and operation planning of space manipulator systems because of the difficulties of ground-based physical tests with large, flexible robotic systems. Modeling of contact dynamics has increasingly become an essential step in dynamics simulation of space station robotic operations (such as the assembly and maintenance of the station). This role requires the modeling tool to have very high fidelity. This paper describes a research project aimed at experimentally validating a general contact dynamics simulation software developed by McDonald Dettwiler Space and Advanced Robotics Ltd (previously Spar Aerospace Ltd). The experimental tests were carried out in the robotics laboratory at the University of Victoria. The validation results demonstrated that the software is capable of predicting realistic contact behavior.

[1]  Inhwan Han,et al.  Multi-Body Impact Motion with Friction—Analysis, Simulation, and Experimental Validation , 1993 .

[2]  J. Goncalves A Test Facility for Multi-armed Space-based Manipulators , .

[3]  A. A. Barhorst,et al.  Modelling, simulation and experimental verification of contact/impact dynamics in flexible multi-body systems , 1999 .

[4]  K. Alder,et al.  Role of estimation in real-time contact dynamics enhancement of space station engineering facility , 1996, IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag..

[5]  Jikuang Yang,et al.  DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF A HUMAN-BODY MATHEMATICAL MODEL FOR SIMULATION OF CAR-PEDESTRIAN COLLISIONS , 1997 .

[6]  Annette L. Rizer,et al.  Predictive Simulation of Restrained Occupant Dynamics in Vehicle Rollovers , 1993 .

[7]  Daniel E. Whitney,et al.  Quasi-Static Assembly of Compliantly Supported Rigid Parts , 1982 .

[8]  Hamid M. Lankarani,et al.  Continuous contact force models for impact analysis in multibody systems , 1994, Nonlinear Dynamics.

[9]  Liang-Boon Wee,et al.  On the dynamics of contact between space robots and configuration control for impact minimization , 1993, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[10]  D.M. Dawson,et al.  Redesign of Robust Controllers for RLFJ Robotic Manipulators Actuated with Harmonic Drives , 1993, 1993 American Control Conference.

[11]  J. Barbera,et al.  Contact mechanics , 1999 .

[12]  Inna Sharf,et al.  DEVELOPMENT OF A PLANAR MACRO-MICRO MANIPULATOR FACILITY : FROM DESIGN THROUGH MODEL VALIDATION , 1998 .

[13]  A. Shabana,et al.  DYNAMICS OF MULTIBODY SYSTEMS WITH VARIABLE KINEMATIC STRUCTURE. , 1986 .

[14]  Hamid M. Lankarani,et al.  A Multibody/Finite Element Analysis Approach for Modeling of Crash Dynamic Responses , 1997 .

[15]  M. Anitescu,et al.  Formulating Three-Dimensional Contact Dynamics Problems , 1996 .

[16]  Erick Dupuis,et al.  Hardware-in-the-Loop Simulation, of Robots Performing Contact Tasks , 1999 .

[17]  Miomir Vukobratović,et al.  Dynamics of Contact Tasks in Robotics. Part II—Case Study in Dynamics of Contact Motion , 1999 .

[18]  Veljko Potkonjak,et al.  Dynamics of contact tasks in robotics. Part I: general model of robot interacting with environment , 1999 .

[19]  Ou Ma,et al.  MDSF - A generic development and simulation facility for flexible, complex robotic systems , 1997, Robotica.