Assessing Compliance with 60-Hertz Magnetic-Field Exposure Guidelines

Exposure limits for magnetic fields in the extremely low frequency range (3 to 3000 hertz) have been established by a number of organizations. The limits are generally intended to prevent overstimulation of electrically sensitive tissue and are expressed as ceiling values—levels not to be exceeded even momentarily. Exposures near or above the limits occur around high-current equipment and often have large spatial and temporal variability. The combination of variable exposures and ceiling-value exposure limits means that a practical exposure assessment must be statistically based. Practical guidance for assessing compliance for these exposures is limited. To fill this gap, this work develops a statistically based sampling and analysis methodology for evaluating compliance with magnetic-field exposure guidelines, using 60-hertz exposures in the electric utility industry as a model. The resulting methodology relies on [1] defining a scenario that includes tasks with similar high-field exposures for a group of workers, [2] having appropriate protocols for performing magnetic-field personal exposure measurements or having an exposure data set corresponding to that scenario, [3] assuming that the measured peak field is consistent with the exposure limit, [4] assuming that the peak exposure values follow a lognormal distribution, and [5] collecting sufficient measurements to determine the probability of compliance with a desired degree of statistical confidence. As examples, specific compliance probabilities and their confidence intervals are estimated for electric utility scenarios from available personal exposure measurements. This specific application demonstrates the general methodology and indicates that compliance with existing exposure limits may become an issue for certain tasks.

[1]  T Dan Bracken ASSESSING COMPLIANCE WITH POWER-FREQUENCY MAGNETIC-FIELD GUIDELINES , 2002, Health physics.

[2]  A. Ahlbom Guidelines for limiting exposure to time-varying electric, magnetic, and electromagnetic fields (up to 300 GHz) , 1998 .

[3]  K. A. Busch,et al.  Occupational exposure sampling strategy manual , 1977 .

[4]  R. Cheng,et al.  Confidence Bands for Cumulative Distribution Functions of Continuous Random Variables , 1983 .

[5]  J. Mulhausen,et al.  A strategy for assessing and managing occupational exposures , 1998 .

[6]  G. Ziegelberger,et al.  International commission on non-ionizing radiation protection. , 2006, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[7]  D. M. Sassone,et al.  Comparison of extremely low frequency (ELF) magnetic field personal exposure monitors , 2002, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology.

[8]  G. Eichholz Non-ionizing Radiation, Part 1: Static and Extremely Low-frequency (elf) Electric and Magnetic Fields, , 2002 .

[9]  T D Bracken,et al.  Magnetic-field exposures of cable splicers in electrical network distribution vaults. , 2001, Applied occupational and environmental hygiene.

[10]  N. Wertheimer,et al.  Potential motion related bias in the worn dosimeter measurements of two childhood leukemia studies , 2002, Bioelectromagnetics.

[11]  Joseph D Bowman,et al.  MANUAL FOR MEASURING OCCUPATIONAL ELECTRIC AND MAGNETIC FIELD EXPOSURES , 1998 .

[12]  Robert Kavet,et al.  Magnetic Field Exposures in the Electric Utility Industry Relevant to Occupational Guideline Levels , 1997 .

[13]  M. Key National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; occupational exposure to inorganic lead: request for comments and information; republication--NIOSH. Request for comments and information relevant to occupational exposure to inorganic lead. , 1997, Federal register.

[14]  W. David Kelton,et al.  Statistical design and analysis , 1986, WSC '86.

[15]  Iarc Monographs,et al.  Non-ionizing radiation, Part 1: static and extremely low-frequency (ELF) electric and magnetic fields. , 2002, IARC monographs on the evaluation of carcinogenic risks to humans.