Abbreviated Biparametric Prostate MR Imaging in Men with Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen.

Purpose To determine the diagnostic accuracy for clinically significant prostate cancer achieved with abbreviated biparametric prostate magnetic resonance (MR) imaging in comparison with full multiparametric contrast material-enhanced prostate MR imaging in men with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and negative transrectal ultrasonography (US)-guided biopsy findings; to determine the significant cancer detection rate of biparametric versus full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging and between-reader agreement for interpretation of biparametric MR imaging. Materials and Methods In this institutional review board-approved retrospective review of prospectively acquired data, men with PSA greater than or equal to 3 ng/mL after negative transrectal US-guided biopsy findings underwent state-of-the-art, full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging at 3.0-T including high-spatial-resolution structural imaging in several planes, diffusion-weighted imaging at 0, 800, 1000, and 1400 mm2/sec, and dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging, obtained without endorectal coil within 34 minutes 19 seconds. One of four radiologists with different levels of expertise (1-9 years) first reviewed only a fraction of the full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR images, consisting of single-plane (axial) structural imaging (T2-weighted turbo spin-echo and diffusion-weighted imaging), acquired within 8 minutes 45 seconds (referred to as biparametric MR imaging), and established a diagnosis according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2; only thereafter, the remaining full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR images were read. Men with PI-RADS categories 3-5 underwent MR-guided targeted biopsy. Men with PI-RADS categories 1-2 remained in urologic follow-up for at least 2 years, with rebiopsy (transrectal US-guided or transperineal saturation) where appropriate. McNemar test was used to compare diagnostic accuracies. To investigate between-reader agreement, biparametric MR images of 100 patients were read independently by all three radiologists. Results A total of 542 men, aged 64.8 years ± 8.2 (median PSA, 7 ng/mL), were included. Biparametric MR imaging helped detect clinically significant prostate cancer in 138 men. Full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging allowed detection of one additional clinically significant prostate cancer (a stage pT2a, intermediate-risk cancer with a Gleason score of 3+4) and caused 11 additional false-positive diagnoses. Diagnostic accuracy for detection of clinically significant cancer of biparametric MR imaging (89.1%, 483 of 542) was similar to that of full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging (87.2%, 473 of 542). Between-reader agreement of biparametric MR imaging interpretation was substantial (κ = 0.81). Conclusion Biparametric MR imaging allows detection of clinically significant prostate cancer missed by transrectal US-guided biopsy. Biparametric prostate MR imaging takes less than 9 minutes examination time, works without contrast agent injection, and offers a diagnostic accuracy and cancer detection rate that are equivalent to those of conventional full multiparametric contrast-enhanced MR imaging protocols. © RSNA, 2017.

[1]  P. Dean,et al.  Novel biparametric MRI and targeted biopsy improves risk stratification in men with a clinical suspicion of prostate cancer (IMPROD Trial) , 2017, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Jason D. Wright,et al.  Increase in Prostate Cancer Distant Metastases at Diagnosis in the United States , 2017, JAMA oncology.

[3]  Adam T Froemming,et al.  The Incremental Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Staging before Radical Prostatectomy. , 2017, European urology.

[4]  A. Vickers,et al.  Screening for Prostate Cancer Starting at Age 50-54 Years. A Population-based Cohort Study. , 2017, European urology.

[5]  David D. Casalino,et al.  Dramatic increase in the utilization of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection and management of prostate cancer , 2017, Abdominal Radiology.

[6]  Arturo Brunetti,et al.  Biparametric 3T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for prostatic cancer detection in a biopsy-naïve patient population: a further improvement of PI-RADS v2? , 2016, European journal of radiology.

[7]  D. Margolis,et al.  Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR. , 2016, The Journal of urology.

[8]  M. Roethke,et al.  Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and MRI-Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy for Index Tumor Detection: Correlation with Radical Prostatectomy Specimen. , 2016, European urology.

[9]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Estimating the harms and benefits of prostate cancer screening as used in common practice versus recommended good practice: A microsimulation screening analysis , 2016, Cancer.

[10]  A. Auvinen,et al.  Correlation between stage shift and differences in mortality in the European Randomised study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) , 2016, BJU international.

[11]  P. Mozer,et al.  Are Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Targeted Biopsies Noninferior to Transrectal Ultrasound Guided Systematic Biopsies for the Detection of Prostate Cancer? , 2016, The Journal of urology.

[12]  J. Hugosson,et al.  Role of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening: A Pilot Study Within the Göteborg Randomised Screening Trial. , 2016, European urology.

[13]  H. Thomsen,et al.  Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer , 2016, Acta radiologica open.

[14]  Rajan T. Gupta,et al.  Defining the Incremental Utility of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging at Standard and Specialized Read in Predicting Extracapsular Extension of Prostate Cancer. , 2016, European urology.

[15]  J Alfred Witjes,et al.  Accuracy of Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Local Staging of Prostate Cancer: A Diagnostic Meta-analysis. , 2016, European urology.

[16]  S. Taneja Re: Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-Guided In-Bore Biopsy to MRI-Ultrasound Fusion and Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies. , 2016, The Journal of urology.

[17]  Dorothy A. Sippo,et al.  An Abbreviated Protocol for High-Risk Screening Breast MRI Saves Time and Resources. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[18]  Fang-Ming Deng,et al.  Relationship Between Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI), Biopsy Indication, and MRI-ultrasound Fusion-targeted Prostate Biopsy Outcomes. , 2016, European urology.

[19]  Saila Kauppila,et al.  Prebiopsy Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis in Biopsy-naive Men with Suspected Prostate Cancer Based on Elevated Prostate-specific Antigen Values: Results from a Randomized Prospective Blinded Controlled Trial. , 2016, European urology.

[20]  P. Choyke,et al.  Combined Biparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Prostate-specific Antigen in the Detection of Prostate Cancer: A Validation Study in a Biopsy-naive Patient Population. , 2016, Urology.

[21]  J. Fütterer,et al.  Can Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Be Detected with Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging? A Systematic Review of the Literature. , 2015, European urology.

[22]  A. Jemal,et al.  Prostate Cancer Incidence and PSA Testing Patterns in Relation to USPSTF Screening Recommendations. , 2015, JAMA.

[23]  H. D. de Koning,et al.  Metastatic Prostate Cancer Incidence and Prostate-specific Antigen Testing: New Insights from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer. , 2015, European urology.

[24]  Sora C. Yoon,et al.  Abbreviated screening protocol for breast MRI: a feasibility study. , 2015, Academic radiology.

[25]  H. Merisaari,et al.  Prebiopsy multiparametric 3T prostate MRI in patients with elevated PSA, normal digital rectal examination, and no previous biopsy , 2015, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[26]  F. Beuvon,et al.  Detection of significant prostate cancer with magnetic resonance targeted biopsies--should transrectal ultrasound-magnetic resonance imaging fusion guided biopsies alone be a standard of care? , 2015, The Journal of urology.

[27]  P. Choyke,et al.  Diagnostic value of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as an adjunct to prostate‐specific antigen (PSA)‐based detection of prostate cancer in men without prior biopsies , 2015, BJU international.

[28]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Comparison of MR/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy with ultrasound-guided biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. , 2015, JAMA.

[29]  T. Tammela,et al.  Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up , 2014, The Lancet.

[30]  X Wang,et al.  High-b-value diffusion-weighted MRI for the detection of prostate cancer at 3 T. , 2014, Clinical radiology.

[31]  Ralf-Dieter Hilgers,et al.  Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI. , 2014, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[32]  F. Schröder,et al.  Prospective study of diagnostic accuracy comparing prostate cancer detection by transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy versus magnetic resonance (MR) imaging with subsequent MR-guided biopsy in men without previous prostate biopsies. , 2014, European urology.

[33]  Chen Jie,et al.  The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis , 2014, European Radiology.

[34]  Shyam Natarajan,et al.  Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. , 2014, European urology.

[35]  Marco Salvatore,et al.  Comparison Between Gleason Score and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Obtained from Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer Patients , 2013, Cancer investigation.

[36]  Walter Artibani,et al.  Early detection of prostate cancer: European Association of Urology recommendation. , 2013, European urology.

[37]  A. Partin,et al.  Contemporary evaluation of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network prostate cancer risk classification system. , 2012, Urology.

[38]  V. Moyer,et al.  Screening for Prostate Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement , 2012, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[39]  Lars Egevad,et al.  A contemporary update on pathology reporting for prostate cancer: biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens. , 2012, European urology.

[40]  C. Parker,et al.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and characterisation of prostate cancer: The PROMIS study. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[41]  J. Fütterer,et al.  ESUR prostate MR guidelines 2012 , 2012, European Radiology.

[42]  Jelle O. Barentsz,et al.  Prostate MRI: diffusion-weighted imaging at 1.5T correlates better with prostatectomy Gleason grades than TRUS-guided biopsies in peripheral zone tumours , 2012, European Radiology.

[43]  B. Carey,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting. , 2011, European urology.

[44]  P. Choyke,et al.  Prostate cancer: value of multiparametric MR imaging at 3 T for detection--histopathologic correlation. , 2010, Radiology.

[45]  A. D'Amico,et al.  American Cancer Society Guideline for the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Update 2010 , 2010, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[46]  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer,et al.  MRI-guided biopsy of the prostate increases diagnostic performance in men with elevated or increasing PSA levels after previous negative TRUS biopsies. , 2006, European urology.

[47]  B. Konety,et al.  Prevalence of prostate specific antigen testing for prostate cancer in elderly men. , 2006, The Journal of urology.

[48]  Hartwig Huland,et al.  Counseling men with prostate cancer: a nomogram for predicting the presence of small, moderately differentiated, confined tumors. , 2003, The Journal of urology.

[49]  John E Tomaszewski,et al.  Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy for patients with clinically localized prostate carcinoma in the prostate specific antigen era , 2002, Cancer.