Blind image quality assessment via semi-supervised learning and fuzzy inference

Blind image quality assessment (BIQA) is a challenging task due to the difficulties in extracting quality-aware features and modeling the relationship between the image features and the visual quality. Until now, most BIQA metrics available try to extract statistical features based on the natural scene statistics (NSS) and build mapping from the features to the quality score using the supervised machine learning technique based on a large amount of labeled images. Although several promising metrics have been proposed based on the above methodology, there are two drawbacks of these algorithms. First, only the labeled images are adopted for machine learning. However, it has been proved that using unlabeled data in the training stage can improve the learning performance. In addition, these metrics try to learn a direct mapping from the features to the quality score. However, subjective quality evaluation would be rather a fuzzy process than a distinctive one. Equally, human beings tend to evaluate the quality of a given image by first judging the extents it belongs to “excellent,” “good,” “fair,” “bad,” and “poor,” and estimating the quality score subsequently, rather than directly giving an exact subjective quality score. To overcome the aforementioned problems, we propose a semi-supervised and fuzzy framework for blind image quality assessment, S2F2, in this paper. In the proposed framework, (1) we formulate the fuzzy process of subjective quality assessment by using fuzzy inference. Specially, we model the membership relation between the subjective quality score and the truth values it belongs to “excellent,” “good,” “fair,” “bad,” and “poor” using a Gaussian function, respectively; and (2) we introduce the semi-supervised local linear embedding (SS-LLE) to learn the mapping function from the image features to the truth values using both the labeled and unlabeled images. In addition, we extract image features based on NSS since it has led to promising performances for image quality assessment. Experimental results on two benchmarking databases, i.e., the LIVE database II and the TID2008 database, demonstrate the effectiveness and promising performance of the proposed S2F2 algorithm for BIQA.

[1]  Lawrence K. Saul,et al.  Think Globally, Fit Locally: Unsupervised Learning of Low Dimensional Manifold , 2003, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[2]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[3]  Robert LIN,et al.  NOTE ON FUZZY SETS , 2014 .

[4]  Xiaojin Zhu,et al.  --1 CONTENTS , 2006 .

[5]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  A Two-Step Framework for Constructing Blind Image Quality Indices , 2010, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[6]  R. SheikhH.,et al.  No-reference quality assessment using natural scene statistics , 2005 .

[7]  Fabio Gagliardi Cozman,et al.  Semi-Supervised Learning of Mixture Models , 2003, ICML.

[8]  M. Varanasi,et al.  Parametric generalized Gaussian density estimation , 1989 .

[9]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: From Natural Scene Statistics to Perceptual Quality , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[10]  J. Hosking L‐Moments: Analysis and Estimation of Distributions Using Linear Combinations of Order Statistics , 1990 .

[11]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment in the Spatial Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[12]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Making a “Completely Blind” Image Quality Analyzer , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[13]  Raghu Krishnapuram,et al.  A robust approach to image enhancement based on fuzzy logic , 1997, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  J. Tenenbaum,et al.  Infants consider both the sample and the sampling process in inductive generalization , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Xuelong Li,et al.  Sparse representation for blind image quality assessment , 2012, 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

[16]  Tiago Rosa Maria Paula Queluz,et al.  No-reference image quality assessment based on DCT domain statistics , 2008, Signal Process..

[17]  Thomas Hofmann,et al.  Unsupervised Learning by Probabilistic Latent Semantic Analysis , 2004, Machine Learning.

[18]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  The Manifold Ways of Perception , 2000, Science.

[19]  Sugato Chakravarty,et al.  Methodology for the subjective assessment of the quality of television pictures , 1995 .

[20]  Nikolay N. Ponomarenko,et al.  TID2008 – A database for evaluation of full-reference visual quality assessment metrics , 2004 .

[21]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[22]  Qijun Zhao,et al.  Facial expression recognition on multiple manifolds , 2011, Pattern Recognit..

[23]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Making image quality assessment robust , 2012, 2012 Conference Record of the Forty Sixth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers (ASILOMAR).

[24]  Christophe Charrier,et al.  A Machine Learning-based Color Image Quality Metric , 2006, CGIV.

[25]  Xuelong Li,et al.  Image Quality Assessment Based on Multiscale Geometric Analysis , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[26]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  No-reference quality assessment using natural scene statistics: JPEG2000 , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[27]  Michio Sugeno,et al.  A fuzzy-logic-based approach to qualitative modeling , 1993, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[28]  Vladimir Vapnik,et al.  Statistical learning theory , 1998 .

[29]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Logic , 2009, Encyclopedia of Complexity and Systems Science.

[30]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy logic = computing with words , 1996, IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst..

[31]  Xiaojin Zhu,et al.  Humans Perform Semi-Supervised Classification Too , 2007, AAAI.

[32]  S T Roweis,et al.  Nonlinear dimensionality reduction by locally linear embedding. , 2000, Science.

[33]  Zhou Wang,et al.  No-reference perceptual quality assessment of JPEG compressed images , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[34]  Xin Yang,et al.  Semi-supervised nonlinear dimensionality reduction , 2006, ICML.

[35]  Shanwen Zhang,et al.  Dimension Reduction Using Semi-Supervised Locally Linear Embedding for Plant Leaf Classification , 2009, ICIC.

[36]  George D. Magoulas,et al.  Neural network-based fuzzy modeling of the student in intelligent tutoring systems , 1999, IJCNN'99. International Joint Conference on Neural Networks. Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36339).

[37]  Joydeep Ghosh,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment Without Human Training Using Latent Quality Factors , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[38]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image compression via joint statistical characterization in the wavelet domain , 1999, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[39]  Marc Gazalet,et al.  Univariant assessment of the quality of images , 2002, J. Electronic Imaging.

[40]  H. Sebastian Seung,et al.  Learning Continuous Attractors in Recurrent Networks , 1997, NIPS.

[41]  Xiaojin Zhu,et al.  Introduction to Semi-Supervised Learning , 2009, Synthesis Lectures on Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning.

[42]  Aly A. Farag,et al.  A modified fuzzy c-means algorithm for bias field estimation and segmentation of MRI data , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[43]  Alexandre G. Ciancio,et al.  No-Reference Blur Assessment of Digital Pictures Based on Multifeature Classifiers , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[44]  Christophe Charrier,et al.  Blind Image Quality Assessment: A Natural Scene Statistics Approach in the DCT Domain , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[45]  T. J. Page Multivariate Statistics: A Vector Space Approach , 1984 .

[46]  David S. Doermann,et al.  No-Reference Image Quality Assessment Using Visual Codebooks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.