Statistical Properties of Covariance Tapers

Compactly supported autocovariance functions reduce computations needed for estimation and prediction under Gaussian process models, which are commonly used to model spatial and spatial-temporal data. A critical issue in using such models is the loss in statistical efficiency caused when the true autocovariance function is not compactly supported. Theoretical results indicate the value of specifying the local behavior of the process correctly. One way to obtain a compactly supported autocovariance function that has similar local behavior to an autocovariance function K of interest is to multiply K by some smooth compactly supported autocovariance function, which is called covariance tapering. This work extends previous theoretical results showing that covariance tapering has some asymptotic optimality properties as the number of observations in a fixed and bounded domain increases. However, numerical experiments show that for purposes of parameter estimation, covariance tapering often does not work as well as the simple alternative of breaking the observations into blocks and ignoring dependence across blocks. When covariance tapering is used for spatial prediction, predictions near the boundary of the observation domain are affected most. This article proposes an approach to modifying the taper to ameliorate this edge effect. In addition, a justification for a specific approach to carrying out conditional simulations based on tapered covariances is given. Supplementary materials for this article are available online.

[1]  M. Stein Simulation of Gaussian Random Fields With One Derivative , 2012 .

[2]  H. Bohman,et al.  Approximate fourier analysis of distribution functions , 1961 .

[3]  Derek Bingham,et al.  Efficient emulators of computer experiments using compactly supported correlation functions, with an application to cosmology , 2011, 1107.0749.

[4]  T. Gneiting,et al.  Fast and Exact Simulation of Large Gaussian Lattice Systems in ℝ2: Exploring the Limits , 2006 .

[5]  MIHAI ANITESCU,et al.  A Matrix-free Approach for Solving the Parametric Gaussian Process Maximum Likelihood Problem , 2012, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[6]  Tilmann Gneiting,et al.  Stochastic Models That Separate Fractal Dimension and the Hurst Effect , 2001, SIAM Rev..

[7]  Michael L. Stein,et al.  Fast and Exact Simulation of Fractional Brownian Surfaces , 2002 .

[8]  V. Mandrekar,et al.  Fixed-domain asymptotic properties of tapered maximum likelihood estimators , 2009, 0909.0359.

[9]  Haotian Hang,et al.  Inconsistent Estimation and Asymptotically Equal Interpolations in Model-Based Geostatistics , 2004 .

[10]  Douglas W. Nychka,et al.  Nonstationary Positive Definite Tapering On The Plane , 2013 .

[11]  D. Nychka,et al.  Covariance Tapering for Interpolation of Large Spatial Datasets , 2006 .

[12]  N. Reid,et al.  AN OVERVIEW OF COMPOSITE LIKELIHOOD METHODS , 2011 .

[13]  Zhiyi Chi,et al.  Approximating likelihoods for large spatial data sets , 2004 .

[14]  Benjamin Shaby,et al.  The role of the range parameter for estimation and prediction in geostatistics , 2011, 1108.1851.

[15]  Timothy A. Davis,et al.  Direct methods for sparse linear systems , 2006, Fundamentals of algorithms.

[16]  Holger Wendland,et al.  Piecewise polynomial, positive definite and compactly supported radial functions of minimal degree , 1995, Adv. Comput. Math..

[17]  A modification of minimum norm quadratic estimation of a generalized covariance function for use with large data sets , 1986 .

[18]  J. Chilès,et al.  Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty , 1999 .

[19]  Wei-Liem Loh,et al.  On fixed-domain asymptotics and covariance tapering in Gaussian random field models , 2011 .

[20]  A. V. Vecchia Estimation and model identification for continuous spatial processes , 1988 .

[21]  Douglas W. Nychka,et al.  Covariance Tapering for Likelihood-Based Estimation in Large Spatial Data Sets , 2008 .

[22]  T. Gneiting Compactly Supported Correlation Functions , 2002 .

[23]  A. Wood,et al.  Simulation of Stationary Gaussian Processes in [0, 1] d , 1994 .

[24]  C. R. Dietrich,et al.  A fast and exact method for multidimensional gaussian stochastic simulations , 1993 .

[25]  Michael L. Stein,et al.  2010 Rietz lecture: When does the screening effect hold? , 2011, 1203.1801.

[26]  Richard E. Chandler,et al.  Inference for clustered data using the independence loglikelihood , 2007 .

[27]  Gene H. Golub,et al.  Matrix computations (3rd ed.) , 1996 .

[28]  Luigi Pace,et al.  ADJUSTING COMPOSITE LIKELIHOOD RATIO STATISTICS , 2009 .

[29]  Steven Kay,et al.  Gaussian Random Processes , 1978 .

[30]  Richard L. Smith,et al.  Asymptotic properties of computationally efficient alternative estimators for a class of multivariate normal models , 2007 .

[31]  Roger Woodard,et al.  Interpolation of Spatial Data: Some Theory for Kriging , 1999, Technometrics.