Processing Spatial Relations With Different Apertures of Attention

Neuropsychological studies suggest the existence of lateralized networks that represent categorical and coordinate types of spatial information. In addition, studies with neural networks have shown that they encode more effectively categorical spatial judgments or coordinate spatial judgments, if their input is based, respectively, on units with relatively small, nonoverlapping receptive fields, as opposed to units with relatively large, overlapping receptive fields. These findings leave open the question of whether interactive processes between spatial detectors and types of spatial relations can be modulated by spatial attention. We hypothesized that spreading the attention window to encompass an area that includes two objects promotes coordinate spatial relations, based on coarse coding by large, overlapping, receptive fields. In contrast, narrowing attention to encompass an area that includes only one of the objects benefits categorical spatial relations, by effectively parsing space. By use of a cueing procedure, the spatial attention window was manipulated to select regions of differing areas. As predicted, when the attention window was large, coordinate spatial transformations were noticed faster than categorical transformations; in contrast, when the attention window was relatively smaller, categorical spatial transformations were noticed faster than coordinate transformations. Another novel finding was that coordinate changes were noticed faster when cueing an area that included both objects as well as the empty space between them than when simultaneously cueing both areas including the objects while leaving the gap between them uncued.

[1]  M. Carrasco,et al.  The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[2]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Identifying objects in conventional and contorted poses: contributions of hemisphere-specific mechanisms , 1999, Cognition.

[3]  J. Hoffman,et al.  The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[4]  S. Yantis 2. Attentional capture in vision , 1996 .

[5]  Ayako Saneyoshi,et al.  Hemispheric processing of categorical/metric properties in object recognition , 2006, Neuroreport.

[6]  D. Kemmerer The semantics of space: Integrating linguistic typology and cognitive neuroscience , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  D. LaBerge,et al.  Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .

[8]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  J. Hellige,et al.  Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[10]  N. Giard,et al.  Balint's Syndrome , 1980, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.

[11]  D. Somers,et al.  Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[12]  S. Yantis,et al.  Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  L. Mannucci,et al.  Chemical Stimulation of Synaptosomes Modulates α-Ca2+/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase II mRNA Association to Polysomes , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[14]  S. Vecera,et al.  Psychoanatomical substrates of Bálint's syndrome , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.

[15]  Ronald Hübner,et al.  Functional hemispheric differences for the categorization of global and local information in naturalistic stimuli , 2009, Brain and Cognition.

[16]  Ronald Hübner,et al.  Hemispheric Differences in Global/Local Processing Revealed by Same-Different Judgements , 1998 .

[17]  J. Jonides Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .

[18]  Carlo Caltagirone,et al.  Rigid And Nonrigid Objects In Canonical And Noncanonical Views: Hemisphere-Specific Effects On Object Identification , 2002, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[19]  Arno Villringer,et al.  A Physiological Correlate of the “Zoom Lens” of Visual Attention , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[20]  Rob H. J. van der Lubbe,et al.  Divergence of categorical and coordinate spatial processing assessed with ERPs , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  G. Alvarez,et al.  How many locations can be selected at once? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  M. Posner,et al.  Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[23]  R. Ivry,et al.  Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  D. Homa,et al.  Sensitization of the visual field. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[25]  Bruno Laeng,et al.  CAN DEFICITS IN SPATIAL INDEXING CONTRIBUTE TO SIMULTANAGNOSIA , 1999 .

[26]  Stefan Pollmann,et al.  Division of labor between the hemispheres for complex but not simple tasks: an implemented connectionist model. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[27]  D. Delis,et al.  Hemispheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli , 1986, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  T. Stoffer,et al.  The time course of attentional zooming: A comparison of voluntary and involuntary allocation of attention to the levels of compound stimuli , 1993, Psychological research.

[29]  A. Kramer,et al.  Splitting the Beam: Distribution of Attention Over Noncontiguous Regions of the Visual Field , 1995 .

[30]  Bruno Laeng,et al.  Cerebral lateralization for the processing of spatial coordinates and categories in left- and right-handers , 1995, Neuropsychologia.

[31]  J. Reynolds,et al.  Exogenously cued attention triggers competitive selection of surfaces , 2003, Vision Research.

[32]  C. Eriksen,et al.  Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[33]  S. Levinson,et al.  'Natural Concepts' in the Spatial Topologial Domain--Adpositional Meanings in Crosslinguistic Perspective: An Exercise in Semantic Typology , 2003 .

[34]  S. Pinker The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature , 2007 .

[35]  David Crundall,et al.  Confirming statements about pictures of natural scenes , 2005 .

[36]  M. Carrasco,et al.  Attention Alters the Appearance of Spatial Frequency and Gap Size , 2005, Psychological science.

[37]  Yehoshua Tsal,et al.  Towards a resolution theory of visual attention. , 1995 .

[38]  L. Carlson,et al.  The space in spatial language , 2004 .

[39]  T. Poggio,et al.  Visual hyperacuity: spatiotemporal interpolation in human vision , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[40]  J. Hellige Hemispheric asymmetry for components of visual information processing. , 1995 .

[41]  R. Rafal,et al.  Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  R. Ivry,et al.  The two sides of perception , 1997 .

[43]  Francesco Maringelli Carlo Umilta,et al.  The Control of the Attentional Focus , 1998 .

[44]  Leonard Talmy,et al.  How Language Structures Space , 1983 .

[45]  Robert A. Jacobs,et al.  Encoding Shape and Spatial Relations: The Role of -Receptive Field Size in Coordinating Complementary Representations , 1994 .

[46]  Harvey A Swadlow,et al.  Task difficulty modulates the activity of specific neuronal populations in primary visual cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[47]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.

[48]  Laura A. Carlson,et al.  Grounding spatial language in perception: an empirical and computational investigation. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[49]  Arthur F. Kramer,et al.  Further Evidence for the Division of Attention Among Non-contiguous Locations , 1998 .

[50]  A. Treisman How the deployment of attention determines what we see , 2006, Visual cognition.

[51]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields , 2005, Psychological science.

[52]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  Distributed Representations , 1986, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.

[53]  G. Holmes,et al.  DISTURBANCES OF SPATIAL ORIENTATION AND VISUAL ATTENTION, WITH LOSS OF STEREOSCOPIC VISION , 1919 .

[54]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  Motion signal and the perceived positions of moving objects. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[55]  B. Scholl,et al.  Divide and Conquer , 2004, Psychology Science.

[56]  R. Parasuraman,et al.  The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.

[57]  G J Andersen,et al.  Focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[58]  Liana Palermo,et al.  Hemispheric contribution to categorical and coordinate representational processes: A study on brain-damaged patients , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  William Prinzmetal,et al.  Location perception: TheX-Files parable , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[60]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: computational analyses and computer simulations. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[61]  G. Shulman,et al.  Moving attention through visual space. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[62]  Yehoshua Tsal,et al.  Localization judgments under various levels of attention , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[63]  Joan Stiles,et al.  Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations during an image generation task: evidence from children and adults , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[64]  L M Ward,et al.  Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[65]  Andrea Facoetti,et al.  Automatic and voluntary focusing of attention , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.

[66]  S. Kosslyn Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: a computational approach. , 1987, Psychological review.

[67]  Joseph B. Hellige,et al.  Processing Asymmetries in the Visual System , 2010 .

[68]  A. Treisman,et al.  Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[69]  Y. Burnod,et al.  Is there continuity between categorical and coordinate spatial relations coding? Evidence from a grid/no-grid working memory paradigm , 2008, Neuropsychologia.

[70]  G. Humphreys On Varying the Span of Visual Attention: Evidence for Two Modes of Spatial Attention , 1981 .

[71]  B. C. Motter,et al.  The functional properties of the light-sensitive neurons of the posterior parietal cortex studied in waking monkeys: foveal sparing and opponent vector organization , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[72]  A. Treisman The binding problem , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[73]  G. Miller,et al.  Language and Perception , 1976 .

[74]  U. Castiello,et al.  Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing. , 1990, Acta psychologica.

[75]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[76]  D. Somers,et al.  Multiple Spotlights of Attentional Selection in Human Visual Cortex , 2004, Neuron.

[77]  Julie C. Sedivy,et al.  Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .

[78]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.

[79]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.

[80]  Bruno Laeng,et al.  Exogenous attention differentially modulates the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations. , 2010, Acta psychologica.

[81]  Marisa Carrasco,et al.  The effects of transient attention on spatial resolution and the size of the attentional cue , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[82]  George A Alvarez,et al.  How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[83]  A. Postma,et al.  New insights in categorical and coordinate processing of spatial relations , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[84]  G. Logan Linguistic and Conceptual Control of Visual Spatial Attention , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.

[85]  Patrick Cavanagh,et al.  Attention Routines and the Architecture of Selection , 2004 .

[86]  A. Postma,et al.  On the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a review of the current evidence , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[87]  B. Laeng Constructional apraxia after left or right unilateral stroke , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[88]  C D Frith,et al.  Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[89]  Harold Pashler,et al.  Characterizing the Limits of Human Visual Awareness , 2007, Science.

[90]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Can the Spotlight of Attention Be Shaped Like a Doughnut? Evidence From Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials , 2002 .

[91]  Marilyn L. Shaw,et al.  A capacity allocation model for reaction time. , 1978 .

[92]  S. Kosslyn You can play 20 questions with nature and win: Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations as a case study , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[93]  Stephen Christman,et al.  Visual hemispheric asymmetries depend on which spatial frequencies are task relevant , 1992, Brain and Cognition.

[94]  C. Koch,et al.  Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[95]  S. Ullman Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.

[96]  J O'Keefe,et al.  Vector grammar, places, and the functional role of the spatial prepositions in English , 2001 .

[97]  S. Grossberg,et al.  View-invariant object category learning, recognition, and search: How spatial and object attention are coordinated using surface-based attentional shrouds , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[98]  Geoffrey Edwards,et al.  Toward the simulation of spatial mental images using the Voronoi¨ model , 1998 .

[99]  J. C. Johnston,et al.  Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[100]  H. Pashler,et al.  Evidence for split attentional foci. , 2000, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.

[101]  Monika Harvey,et al.  Balint's Patient , 1995 .

[102]  Shaul Hochstein,et al.  The spread of attention and learning in feature search: effects of target distribution and task difficulty , 2000, Vision Research.

[103]  M. Shaw,et al.  Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[104]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .

[105]  S. Kosslyn Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[106]  B. Laeng Lateralization of Categorical and Coordinate Spatial Functions: A Study of Unilateral Stroke Patients , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[107]  C. Gilbert,et al.  Attention and primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[108]  Helmut Schwegler,et al.  Coarse coding: calculation of the resolution achieved by a population of large receptive field neurons , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.

[109]  Lynn C. Robertson,et al.  Effects of Perceived Space on Spatial Attention , 1999 .

[110]  B. Dosher,et al.  The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.

[111]  P. Cavanagh,et al.  Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.

[112]  P. Rabbitt,et al.  Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption , 1989 .

[113]  B. C. Motter,et al.  The zone of focal attention during active visual search , 1998, Vision Research.

[114]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? , 1996, Nature.

[115]  Ralph Weidner,et al.  Zooming in and zooming out of the attentional focus: an FMRI study. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[116]  John E. Hummel,et al.  Two Roles for Attention in Shape Perception: A Structural Description Model of Visual Scrutiny , 1998 .

[117]  D. Heeger,et al.  Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[118]  Dana H. Ballard,et al.  Cortical connections and parallel processing: Structure and function , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[119]  M. Tarr,et al.  Spatial language and spatial representation , 1995, Cognition.

[120]  J. Theeuwes Endogenous and Exogenous Control of Visual Selection , 1994, Perception.

[121]  S Marrett,et al.  Local and global attention are mapped retinotopically in human occipital cortex. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[122]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[123]  S. Yantis,et al.  Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. , 1984 .

[124]  Matthias M. Müller,et al.  Can the spotlight of attention be shaped like a doughnut? Evidence from steady-state visual evoked potentials. , 2002, Psychological science.

[125]  S. Kosslyn,et al.  Why are What and Where Processed by Separate Cortical Visual Systems? A Computational Investigation , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[126]  David Crundall,et al.  Confirming Statements about Pictures of Natural Scenes: Evidence of the Processing of Gist from Eye Movements , 2005, Perception.

[127]  Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al.  Receptive Field Characteristics That Allow Parietal Lobe Neurons to Encode Spatial Properties of Visual Input: A Computational Analysis , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[128]  C. B. Cave,et al.  Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[129]  D. Slobin From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking” , 1996 .

[130]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Visual surface representation: a critical link between lower-level and higher level vision , 1995 .

[131]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Categorical and Metric Spatial Processes Distinguished by Task Demands and Practice , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[132]  B. C. Motter,et al.  Functional properties of parietal visual neurons: mechanisms of directionality along a single axis , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[133]  Alan L. Yuille,et al.  A Winner-Take-All Mechanism Based on Presynaptic Inhibition Feedback , 1989, Neural Computation.

[134]  G D Logan,et al.  Distance and distraction effects in the apprehension of spatial relations. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[135]  Shingo Yamagata,et al.  Cerebral Asymmetry of the “Top-Down” Allocation of Attention to Global and Local Features , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[136]  G. Logan Spatial attention and the apprehension of spatial relations. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.