Processing Spatial Relations With Different Apertures of Attention
暂无分享,去创建一个
Bruno Laeng | Ayako Saneyoshi | Chikashi Michimata | Matia Okubo | B. Laeng | Matia Okubo | C. Michimata | Ayako Saneyoshi
[1] M. Carrasco,et al. The locus of attentional effects in texture segmentation , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.
[2] S. Kosslyn,et al. Identifying objects in conventional and contorted poses: contributions of hemisphere-specific mechanisms , 1999, Cognition.
[3] J. Hoffman,et al. The role of visual attention in saccadic eye movements , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.
[4] S. Yantis. 2. Attentional capture in vision , 1996 .
[5] Ayako Saneyoshi,et al. Hemispheric processing of categorical/metric properties in object recognition , 2006, Neuroreport.
[6] D. Kemmerer. The semantics of space: Integrating linguistic typology and cognitive neuroscience , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[7] D. LaBerge,et al. Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. , 1989 .
[8] C. Eriksen,et al. Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.
[9] J. Hellige,et al. Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information , 1989, Memory & cognition.
[10] N. Giard,et al. Balint's Syndrome , 1980, Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques.
[11] D. Somers,et al. Functional MRI reveals spatially specific attentional modulation in human primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[12] S. Yantis,et al. Stimulus-driven attentional capture: evidence from equiluminant visual objects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[13] L. Mannucci,et al. Chemical Stimulation of Synaptosomes Modulates α-Ca2+/Calmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase II mRNA Association to Polysomes , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[14] S. Vecera,et al. Psychoanatomical substrates of Bálint's syndrome , 2002, Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry.
[15] Ronald Hübner,et al. Functional hemispheric differences for the categorization of global and local information in naturalistic stimuli , 2009, Brain and Cognition.
[16] Ronald Hübner,et al. Hemispheric Differences in Global/Local Processing Revealed by Same-Different Judgements , 1998 .
[17] J. Jonides. Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement , 1981 .
[18] Carlo Caltagirone,et al. Rigid And Nonrigid Objects In Canonical And Noncanonical Views: Hemisphere-Specific Effects On Object Identification , 2002, Cognitive neuropsychology.
[19] Arno Villringer,et al. A Physiological Correlate of the “Zoom Lens” of Visual Attention , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[20] Rob H. J. van der Lubbe,et al. Divergence of categorical and coordinate spatial processing assessed with ERPs , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[21] G. Alvarez,et al. How many locations can be selected at once? , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[22] M. Posner,et al. Orienting of Attention* , 1980, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.
[23] R. Ivry,et al. Illusory conjunctions inside and outside the focus of attention. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[24] D. Homa,et al. Sensitization of the visual field. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[25] Bruno Laeng,et al. CAN DEFICITS IN SPATIAL INDEXING CONTRIBUTE TO SIMULTANAGNOSIA , 1999 .
[26] Stefan Pollmann,et al. Division of labor between the hemispheres for complex but not simple tasks: an implemented connectionist model. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[27] D. Delis,et al. Hemispheric specialization of memory for visual hierarchical stimuli , 1986, Neuropsychologia.
[28] T. Stoffer,et al. The time course of attentional zooming: A comparison of voluntary and involuntary allocation of attention to the levels of compound stimuli , 1993, Psychological research.
[29] A. Kramer,et al. Splitting the Beam: Distribution of Attention Over Noncontiguous Regions of the Visual Field , 1995 .
[30] Bruno Laeng,et al. Cerebral lateralization for the processing of spatial coordinates and categories in left- and right-handers , 1995, Neuropsychologia.
[31] J. Reynolds,et al. Exogenously cued attention triggers competitive selection of surfaces , 2003, Vision Research.
[32] C. Eriksen,et al. Allocation of attention in the visual field. , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[33] S. Levinson,et al. 'Natural Concepts' in the Spatial Topologial Domain--Adpositional Meanings in Crosslinguistic Perspective: An Exercise in Semantic Typology , 2003 .
[34] S. Pinker. The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature , 2007 .
[35] David Crundall,et al. Confirming statements about pictures of natural scenes , 2005 .
[36] M. Carrasco,et al. Attention Alters the Appearance of Spatial Frequency and Gap Size , 2005, Psychological science.
[37] Yehoshua Tsal,et al. Towards a resolution theory of visual attention. , 1995 .
[38] L. Carlson,et al. The space in spatial language , 2004 .
[39] T. Poggio,et al. Visual hyperacuity: spatiotemporal interpolation in human vision , 1981, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.
[40] J. Hellige. Hemispheric asymmetry for components of visual information processing. , 1995 .
[41] R. Rafal,et al. Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[42] R. Ivry,et al. The two sides of perception , 1997 .
[43] Francesco Maringelli Carlo Umilta,et al. The Control of the Attentional Focus , 1998 .
[44] Leonard Talmy,et al. How Language Structures Space , 1983 .
[45] Robert A. Jacobs,et al. Encoding Shape and Spatial Relations: The Role of -Receptive Field Size in Coordinating Complementary Representations , 1994 .
[46] Harvey A Swadlow,et al. Task difficulty modulates the activity of specific neuronal populations in primary visual cortex , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.
[47] K. Nakayama,et al. Sustained and transient components of focal visual attention , 1989, Vision Research.
[48] Laura A. Carlson,et al. Grounding spatial language in perception: an empirical and computational investigation. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.
[49] Arthur F. Kramer,et al. Further Evidence for the Division of Attention Among Non-contiguous Locations , 1998 .
[50] A. Treisman. How the deployment of attention determines what we see , 2006, Visual cognition.
[51] P. Cavanagh,et al. Independent Resources for Attentional Tracking in the Left and Right Visual Hemifields , 2005, Psychological science.
[52] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Distributed Representations , 1986, The Philosophy of Artificial Intelligence.
[53] G. Holmes,et al. DISTURBANCES OF SPATIAL ORIENTATION AND VISUAL ATTENTION, WITH LOSS OF STEREOSCOPIC VISION , 1919 .
[54] Joan López-Moliner,et al. Motion signal and the perceived positions of moving objects. , 2007, Journal of vision.
[55] B. Scholl,et al. Divide and Conquer , 2004, Psychology Science.
[56] R. Parasuraman,et al. The scaling of spatial attention in visual search and its modification in healthy aging , 2004, Perception & psychophysics.
[57] G J Andersen,et al. Focused attention in three-dimensional space , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.
[58] Liana Palermo,et al. Hemispheric contribution to categorical and coordinate representational processes: A study on brain-damaged patients , 2008, Neuropsychologia.
[59] William Prinzmetal,et al. Location perception: TheX-Files parable , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.
[60] S. Kosslyn,et al. Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations: computational analyses and computer simulations. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[61] G. Shulman,et al. Moving attention through visual space. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[62] Yehoshua Tsal,et al. Localization judgments under various levels of attention , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[63] Joan Stiles,et al. Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations during an image generation task: evidence from children and adults , 2005, Neuropsychologia.
[64] L M Ward,et al. Determinants of attention to local and global features of visual forms. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[65] Andrea Facoetti,et al. Automatic and voluntary focusing of attention , 2000, Perception & psychophysics.
[66] S. Kosslyn. Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: a computational approach. , 1987, Psychological review.
[67] Joseph B. Hellige,et al. Processing Asymmetries in the Visual System , 2010 .
[68] A. Treisman,et al. Attentional spread in the statistical processing of visual displays , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.
[69] Y. Burnod,et al. Is there continuity between categorical and coordinate spatial relations coding? Evidence from a grid/no-grid working memory paradigm , 2008, Neuropsychologia.
[70] G. Humphreys. On Varying the Span of Visual Attention: Evidence for Two Modes of Spatial Attention , 1981 .
[71] B. C. Motter,et al. The functional properties of the light-sensitive neurons of the posterior parietal cortex studied in waking monkeys: foveal sparing and opponent vector organization , 1981, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[72] A. Treisman. The binding problem , 1996, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.
[73] G. Miller,et al. Language and Perception , 1976 .
[74] U. Castiello,et al. Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing. , 1990, Acta psychologica.
[75] P. Cavanagh,et al. Tracking multiple targets with multifocal attention , 2005, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[76] D. Somers,et al. Multiple Spotlights of Attentional Selection in Human Visual Cortex , 2004, Neuron.
[77] Julie C. Sedivy,et al. Subject Terms: Linguistics Language Eyes & eyesight Cognition & reasoning , 1995 .
[78] Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al. Increased Activity in Human Visual Cortex during Directed Attention in the Absence of Visual Stimulation , 1999, Neuron.
[79] Marisa Carrasco,et al. Attention improves or impairs visual performance by enhancing spatial resolution , 1998, Nature.
[80] Bruno Laeng,et al. Exogenous attention differentially modulates the processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations. , 2010, Acta psychologica.
[81] Marisa Carrasco,et al. The effects of transient attention on spatial resolution and the size of the attentional cue , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.
[82] George A Alvarez,et al. How many objects can you track? Evidence for a resource-limited attentive tracking mechanism. , 2007, Journal of vision.
[83] A. Postma,et al. New insights in categorical and coordinate processing of spatial relations , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[84] G. Logan. Linguistic and Conceptual Control of Visual Spatial Attention , 1995, Cognitive Psychology.
[85] Patrick Cavanagh,et al. Attention Routines and the Architecture of Selection , 2004 .
[86] A. Postma,et al. On the hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations: a review of the current evidence , 2003, Neuropsychologia.
[87] B. Laeng. Constructional apraxia after left or right unilateral stroke , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[88] C D Frith,et al. Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.
[89] Harold Pashler,et al. Characterizing the Limits of Human Visual Awareness , 2007, Science.
[90] Matthias M. Müller,et al. Can the Spotlight of Attention Be Shaped Like a Doughnut? Evidence From Steady-State Visual Evoked Potentials , 2002 .
[91] Marilyn L. Shaw,et al. A capacity allocation model for reaction time. , 1978 .
[92] S. Kosslyn. You can play 20 questions with nature and win: Categorical versus coordinate spatial relations as a case study , 2006, Neuropsychologia.
[93] Stephen Christman,et al. Visual hemispheric asymmetries depend on which spatial frequencies are task relevant , 1992, Brain and Cognition.
[94] C. Koch,et al. Attention activates winner-take-all competition among visual filters , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.
[95] S. Ullman. Visual routines , 1984, Cognition.
[96] J O'Keefe,et al. Vector grammar, places, and the functional role of the spatial prepositions in English , 2001 .
[97] S. Grossberg,et al. View-invariant object category learning, recognition, and search: How spatial and object attention are coordinated using surface-based attentional shrouds , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.
[98] Geoffrey Edwards,et al. Toward the simulation of spatial mental images using the Voronoi¨ model , 1998 .
[99] J. C. Johnston,et al. Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[100] H. Pashler,et al. Evidence for split attentional foci. , 2000, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance.
[101] Monika Harvey,et al. Balint's Patient , 1995 .
[102] Shaul Hochstein,et al. The spread of attention and learning in feature search: effects of target distribution and task difficulty , 2000, Vision Research.
[103] M. Shaw,et al. Optimal allocation of cognitive resources to spatial locations. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[104] James L. McClelland,et al. Parallel distributed processing: explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vol. 1: foundations , 1986 .
[105] S. Kosslyn. Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[106] B. Laeng. Lateralization of Categorical and Coordinate Spatial Functions: A Study of Unilateral Stroke Patients , 1994, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[107] C. Gilbert,et al. Attention and primary visual cortex. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[108] Helmut Schwegler,et al. Coarse coding: calculation of the resolution achieved by a population of large receptive field neurons , 1997, Biological Cybernetics.
[109] Lynn C. Robertson,et al. Effects of Perceived Space on Spatial Attention , 1999 .
[110] B. Dosher,et al. The role of attention in the programming of saccades , 1995, Vision Research.
[111] P. Cavanagh,et al. Attention-based visual routines: sprites , 2001, Cognition.
[112] P. Rabbitt,et al. Reflexive and voluntary orienting of visual attention: time course of activation and resistance to interruption , 1989 .
[113] B. C. Motter,et al. The zone of focal attention during active visual search , 1998, Vision Research.
[114] Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al. Where in the brain does visual attention select the forest and the trees? , 1996, Nature.
[115] Ralph Weidner,et al. Zooming in and zooming out of the attentional focus: an FMRI study. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.
[116] John E. Hummel,et al. Two Roles for Attention in Shape Perception: A Structural Description Model of Visual Scrutiny , 1998 .
[117] D. Heeger,et al. Activity in primary visual cortex predicts performance in a visual detection task , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.
[118] Dana H. Ballard,et al. Cortical connections and parallel processing: Structure and function , 1986, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.
[119] M. Tarr,et al. Spatial language and spatial representation , 1995, Cognition.
[120] J. Theeuwes. Endogenous and Exogenous Control of Visual Selection , 1994, Perception.
[121] S Marrett,et al. Local and global attention are mapped retinotopically in human occipital cortex. , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[122] M. Masson,et al. Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[123] S. Yantis,et al. Abrupt visual onsets and selective attention: Evidence from visual search. , 1984 .
[124] Matthias M. Müller,et al. Can the spotlight of attention be shaped like a doughnut? Evidence from steady-state visual evoked potentials. , 2002, Psychological science.
[125] S. Kosslyn,et al. Why are What and Where Processed by Separate Cortical Visual Systems? A Computational Investigation , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[126] David Crundall,et al. Confirming Statements about Pictures of Natural Scenes: Evidence of the Processing of Gist from Eye Movements , 2005, Perception.
[127] Stephen M. Kosslyn,et al. Receptive Field Characteristics That Allow Parietal Lobe Neurons to Encode Spatial Properties of Visual Input: A Computational Analysis , 1990, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[128] C. B. Cave,et al. Evidence for two types of spatial representations: hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate relations. , 1989, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[129] D. Slobin. From “thought and language” to “thinking for speaking” , 1996 .
[130] Shinsuke Shimojo,et al. Visual surface representation: a critical link between lower-level and higher level vision , 1995 .
[131] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Categorical and Metric Spatial Processes Distinguished by Task Demands and Practice , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[132] B. C. Motter,et al. Functional properties of parietal visual neurons: mechanisms of directionality along a single axis , 1987, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[133] Alan L. Yuille,et al. A Winner-Take-All Mechanism Based on Presynaptic Inhibition Feedback , 1989, Neural Computation.
[134] G D Logan,et al. Distance and distraction effects in the apprehension of spatial relations. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.
[135] Shingo Yamagata,et al. Cerebral Asymmetry of the “Top-Down” Allocation of Attention to Global and Local Features , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.
[136] G. Logan. Spatial attention and the apprehension of spatial relations. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.