Engineering aesthetics and aesthetic ergonomics: Theoretical foundations and a dual-process research methodology

Although industrial and product designers are keenly aware of the importance of design aesthetics, they make aesthetic design decisions largely on the basis of their intuitive judgments and ‘educated guesses’. Whilst ergonomics and human factors researchers have made great contributions to the safety, productivity, ease-of-use, and comfort of human-machine-environment systems, aesthetics is largely ignored as a topic of systematic scientific research in human factors and ergonomics. This article discusses the need for incorporating the aesthetics dimension in ergonomics and proposes the establishment of a new scientific and engineering discipline that we can call ‘engineering aesthetics’. This discipline addresses two major questions: How do we use engineering and scientific methods to study aesthetics concepts in general and design aesthetics in particular? How do we incorporate engineering and scientific methods in the aesthetic design and evaluation process? This article identifies two special features that distinguish aesthetic appraisal of products and system designs from aesthetic appreciation of art, and lays out a theoretical foundation as well as a dual-process research methodology for ‘engineering aesthetics’. Sample applications of this methodology are also described.

[1]  E. Krupinski,et al.  The Role of Formal Art Training on Perception and Aesthetic Judgment of Art Compositions , 2017 .

[2]  D E Berlyne Dimensions of perception of exotic and pre-renaissance paintings. , 1975, Canadian journal of psychology.

[3]  Linda A. Jackson,et al.  Physical Appearance and Gender: Sociobiological and Sociocultural Perspectives , 1992 .

[4]  T. Honderich The Oxford Companion to Philosophy , 1995 .

[5]  R. Sleight,et al.  Aesthetic preference for isosceles triangles. , 1951 .

[6]  D. Berlyne,et al.  Aesthetics and Psychobiology , 1975 .

[7]  Daniel Kolb Critique of Judgment , 1988 .

[8]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Analyzing Decision Making: Metric Conjoint Analysis , 1988 .

[9]  D. Buss,et al.  Preferences in human mate selection. , 1986 .

[10]  A. Noē Direct Perception , 2022 .

[11]  J. J. Gibson The theory of affordances , 1977 .

[12]  J. Langlois,et al.  Attractive Faces Are Only Average , 1990 .

[13]  John Hewitt,et al.  Industrial Design: Reflections of a Century , 1995 .

[14]  Murphy A. Sewall Market Segmentation Based on Consumer Ratings of Proposed Product Designs , 1978 .

[15]  S. Franzoi,et al.  Judging Physical Attractiveness , 1987 .

[16]  G. W. Granger An Experimental Study of Colour Harmony , 1955 .

[17]  Colin G. Drury,et al.  Adaptation and Sensitivity to Postural Change in Sitting , 2000, Hum. Factors.

[18]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Analyzing Decision Making , 1988 .

[19]  I. Gordon,et al.  Dimensions of the perception of art: verbal scales and similarity judgements. , 1977, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[20]  Beğlan Toğrol AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF COLOUR-HARMONY , 1961 .

[21]  Anita P. Barbee,et al.  "Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours": Consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female physical attractiveness. , 1995 .

[22]  L. Tucker,et al.  A general procedure for obtaining paired comparisons from multiple rank orders , 1961 .

[23]  Yili Liu,et al.  The aesthetic and the ethic dimensions of human factors and design , 2003, Ergonomics.

[24]  Gustav Theodor Fechner,et al.  Vorschule der Aesthetik , 1876 .

[25]  H. Asher Causal modeling , 1976 .

[26]  Paul R. Farnsworth Preferences for rectangles , 1932 .

[27]  R. Millward,et al.  The Experience of Landscape , 1988 .

[28]  D. Buss,et al.  Human Mate Selection , 2020 .

[29]  M. T. Turvey,et al.  Issues in the theory of action : Degree of freedom, coordinative structures and coalitions , 1978 .

[30]  P. V. Wieringen,et al.  The impact of level of expertise on the evaluation of original and altered versions of post-impressionistic paintings , 1996 .

[31]  P. Jordan Human factors for pleasure in product use. , 1998, Applied ergonomics.

[32]  Frans Boselie,et al.  The Golden Section has no Special Aesthetic Attractivity! , 1992 .

[33]  H. Eysenck A critical and experimental study of colour preferences , 1941 .

[34]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[35]  Berlyne De,et al.  Dimensions of perception of exotic and pre-renaissance paintings. , 1975 .

[36]  Joel Huber,et al.  Separating Perceptual Dimensions from Affective Overtones: An Application to Consumer Aesthetics , 1979 .

[37]  G. Gescheider Psychophysics : method, theory, and application , 1985 .

[38]  C. Martindale,et al.  Priming, prototypicality, and preference. , 1988 .

[39]  Yili Liu Engineering Aesthetics and Ergo-Aesthetics : Theoretical and Methodological Foundations , 2003 .

[40]  H. R. Schiffman,et al.  Golden section: Preferred figural orientation , 1966 .

[41]  Peter Lamarque,et al.  Aesthetics: The Classic Readings , 1997 .

[42]  J. Gibson The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception , 1979 .

[43]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  Workload Assessment and Prediction , 1990 .

[44]  Jane Cauvel,et al.  Art and Its Significance: An Anthology of Aesthetic Theory , 1985 .

[45]  Carolyn Korsmeyer Aesthetics : the big questions , 1998 .

[46]  Earl A. Alluisi,et al.  Studies in the New Experimental Aesthetics , 1975 .

[47]  John F. Lemmer,et al.  Causal Modeling , 1993, UAI.

[48]  E. Leeuwenberg,et al.  Birkhoff revisited: beauty as a function of effect and means. , 1985, The American journal of psychology.

[49]  Mitsuo Nagamachi,et al.  Kansei Engineering: A new ergonomic consumer-oriented technology for product development , 1995 .

[50]  F. J. King,et al.  Multiple Comparisons in a Simplified Rank Method of Scaling , 1969 .