External validation of a clinical prediction model in multiple sclerosis

Background: Timely initiation of disease modifying therapy is crucial for managing multiple sclerosis (MS). Objective: We aimed to validate a previously published predictive model of individual treatment response using a non-overlapping cohort from the Middle East. Methods: We interrogated the MSBase registry for patients who were not included in the initial model development. These patients had relapsing MS or clinically isolated syndrome, a recorded date of disease onset, disability and dates of disease modifying therapy, with sufficient follow-up pre- and post-baseline. Baseline was the visit at which a new disease modifying therapy was initiated, and which served as the start of the predicted period. The original models were used to translate clinical information into three principal components and to predict probability of relapses, disability worsening or improvement, conversion to secondary progressive MS and treatment discontinuation as well as changes in the area under disability-time curve (ΔAUC). Prediction accuracy was assessed using the criteria published previously. Results: The models performed well for predicting the risk of disability worsening and improvement (accuracy: 81%–96%) and performed moderately well for predicting the risk of relapses (accuracy: 73%–91%). The predictions for ΔAUC and risk of treatment discontinuation were suboptimal (accuracy < 44%). Accuracy for predicting the risk of conversion to secondary progressive MS ranged from 50% to 98%. Conclusion: The previously published models are generalisable to patients with a broad range of baseline characteristics in different geographic regions.

[1]  V. Shaygannejad,et al.  Utilization of Multiple Sclerosis Therapies in the Middle East Over a Decade: 2009–2018 , 2021, CNS Drugs.

[2]  P. Sørensen,et al.  Early treatment delays long-term disability accrual in RRMS: Results from the BMSD network , 2021, Multiple sclerosis.

[3]  J. Lechner-Scott,et al.  Effect of Disease Modifying Therapy on Disability in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Over 15 Years. , 2020, Neurology.

[4]  M. Sormani,et al.  Treatment Response Score to Glatiramer Acetate or Interferon Beta-1a , 2020, Neurology.

[5]  M. Sormani,et al.  Prediction of on-treatment disability worsening in RRMS with the MAGNIMS score , 2020, Multiple sclerosis.

[6]  H. Tian,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2019 .

[7]  E. Bernitsas,et al.  Approved and Emerging Disease Modifying Therapies on Neurodegeneration in Multiple Sclerosis , 2020, International journal of molecular sciences.

[8]  J. Lechner-Scott,et al.  Risk of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: A longitudinal study , 2019, Multiple sclerosis.

[9]  À. Rovira,et al.  The long-term outcomes of CIS patients in the Barcelona inception cohort: Looking back to recognize aggressive MS , 2019, Multiple sclerosis.

[10]  M. Slee,et al.  Early clinical markers of aggressive multiple sclerosis. , 2019, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  Markus R. Lange,et al.  Predicting risk of secondary progression in multiple sclerosis: A nomogram , 2018, Multiple sclerosis.

[12]  H. Butzkueven,et al.  Genotype and Phenotype in Multiple Sclerosis—Potential for Disease Course Prediction? , 2018, Current Treatment Options in Neurology.

[13]  À. Rovira,et al.  The value of oligoclonal bands in the multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria , 2018, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  David H. Miller,et al.  Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria , 2017, The Lancet Neurology.

[15]  Pierre Grammond,et al.  Towards personalized therapy for multiple sclerosis: prediction of individual treatment response , 2017, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[16]  J. Lechner-Scott,et al.  Quantifying risk of early relapse in patients with first demyelinating events: Prediction in clinical practice , 2017, Multiple sclerosis.

[17]  A. Traboulsee,et al.  Timing of high-efficacy therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: A systematic review. , 2017, Autoimmunity reviews.

[18]  L. Kappos,et al.  Safety and tolerability profile of daclizumab in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: An integrated analysis of clinical studies. , 2016, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[19]  Gavin Giovannoni,et al.  Brain health: time matters in multiple sclerosis. , 2016, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[20]  M. Filippi,et al.  Assessing response to interferon-β in a multicenter dataset of patients with MS , 2016, Neurology.

[21]  T. Derfuss,et al.  Relapse rates in patients with multiple sclerosis treated with fingolimod: Subgroup analyses of pooled data from three phase 3 trials. , 2016, Multiple sclerosis and related disorders.

[22]  Pierre Grammond,et al.  Predictors of long‐term disability accrual in relapse‐onset multiple sclerosis , 2016, Annals of neurology.

[23]  À. Rovira,et al.  Defining high, medium and low impact prognostic factors for developing multiple sclerosis. , 2015, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  M. Sormani,et al.  Subgroups of multiple sclerosis patients with larger treatment benefits: a meta‐analysis of randomized trials , 2015, European journal of neurology.

[25]  B Stubinski,et al.  Scoring treatment response in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis , 2013, Multiple sclerosis.

[26]  Jeffrey A. Cohen,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria , 2011, Annals of neurology.

[27]  J Sastre-Garriga,et al.  Measures in the first year of therapy predict the response to interferon β in MS , 2009, Multiple sclerosis.

[28]  L. Kappos,et al.  MSBase: an international, online registry and platform for collaborative outcomes research in multiple sclerosis , 2006, Multiple sclerosis.

[29]  Russell E. Glasgow,et al.  Evaluating the Relevance, Generalization, and Applicability of Research , 2006, Evaluation & the health professions.

[30]  S. Reingold,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria” , 2005, Annals of neurology.

[31]  F. Harrell,et al.  Evaluating the yield of medical tests. , 1982, JAMA.