Observations and simulations of asymmetric magnetic field reconnection

[1] Comparisons of asymmetric magnetic field reconnection at the subsolar magnetopause are made between satellite data and computer simulations for the ratio of the antiparallel components of the magnetic fields at the boundaries being about three and the density ratio being 10 to 30. The bipolar electric field and quadrupolar magnetic field of symmetric reconnection are not found in either the simulations or the experimental data because the Hall term in the generalized Ohm's Law (the leading term on its right side on the ion scale) is a factor up to 100 smaller on the magnetosheath side of the current layer than on the magnetospheric side. Average plasma densities and fields at six THEMIS magnetopause crossings agree with open simulations provided that the experimental data is in the joint variance, not minimum variance, frame. This is because the magnetic field component normal to the assumed planar current sheet is not constant for asymmetric reconnection while it is forced to be approximately constant by the mathematics of minimum variance analyses. A north-south asymmetry of the fields and flows in asymmetric reconnection is found in both the simulations and the space measurements. The simulations and the satellite data both have regions the order of the electron skin depth in size that contain significant electric fields. In such structures, parallel electric fields exist in the simulation throughout the current layer. Such parallel fields are similar to those reported earlier from Polar satellite data.

[1]  V. Angelopoulos,et al.  THEMIS observations of modified Hall fields in asymmetric magnetic field reconnection , 2008 .

[2]  P. Pritchett Collisionless magnetic reconnection in an asymmetric current sheet , 2008 .

[3]  P. Cassak,et al.  Asymmetric Magnetic Reconnection: General Theory and Collisional Simulations , 2007 .

[4]  J. Borovsky,et al.  The reconnection of magnetic fields between plasmas with different densities: Scaling relations , 2007 .

[5]  F. Mozer,et al.  Quantitative estimates of magnetic field reconnection properties from electric and magnetic field measurements , 2007 .

[6]  F. Mozer,et al.  Criteria for and statistics of electron diffusion regions associated with subsolar magnetic field reconnection , 2005 .

[7]  R. Lysak,et al.  Cluster observations of an intense normal component of the electric field at a thin reconnecting current sheet in the tail and its role in the shock-like acceleration of the ion fluid into the separatrix region , 2005 .

[8]  S. Gerhardt,et al.  Experimental verification of the Hall effect during magnetic reconnection in a laboratory plasma. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[9]  F. Mozer,et al.  Observations of electron diffusion regions at the subsolar magnetopause. , 2003, Physical review letters.

[10]  M. Shay,et al.  Diamagnetic suppression of component magnetic reconnection at the magnetopause , 2003, physics/0305021.

[11]  F. Mozer,et al.  Evidence of diffusion regions at a subsolar magnetopause crossing. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[12]  Michael Hesse,et al.  Geospace Environmental Modeling (GEM) magnetic reconnection challenge , 2001 .