Critical InfoVis: exploring the politics of visualization

As information visualization is increasingly used to raise awareness about social issues, difficult questions arise about the power of visualization. So far the research community has not given sufficient thought to how values and assumptions pervade information visualization. Taking engaging visualizations as a starting point, we outline a critical approach that promotes disclosure, plurality, contingency, and empowerment. Based on this approach, we pose some challenges and opportunities for visualization researchers and practitioners.

[1]  John T. Stasko,et al.  Casual Information Visualization: Depictions of Data in Everyday Life , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[2]  Donna Harawy.  Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective , 2022, Philosophical Literary Journal Logos.

[3]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  What is "critical" about critical design? , 2013, CHI.

[4]  Paul Smaglik,et al.  Home and away , 2004, Nature.

[5]  E. Jephcott,et al.  Dialectic of Enlightenment , 2002 .

[6]  Nicholas Diakopoulos,et al.  Visualization Rhetoric: Framing Effects in Narrative Visualization , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[7]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design , 2010, CHI.

[8]  A. Feenberg.  Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited , 2002 .

[9]  Alan Borning,et al.  Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems , 2020, The Ethics of Information Technologies.

[10]  C. Kostelnick.  The Visual Rhetoric of Data Displays: The Conundrum of Clarity , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[11]  M. Monmonier.  How to Lie with Maps , 1991 .

[12]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  The contribution of critical IS research , 2008, CACM.

[13]  K. Himma.  The Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics , 2007 .

[14]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  ManyEyes: a Site for Visualization at Internet Scale , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[15]  Jeffrey Bardzell,et al.  Interaction criticism and aesthetics , 2009, CHI.

[16]  Paulo Freire,et al.  Pedagogy of the Oppressed , 2019, Toward a Just World Order.

[17]  Gail A. Herndon.  The chronicle of higher education , 1977 .

[18]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Narrative Visualization: Telling Stories with Data , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[19]  J. B. Harley,et al.  DECONSTRUCTING THE MAP , 1989 .

[20]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Reflective design , 2005, Critical Computing.

[21]  Chris North,et al.  Toward measuring visualization insight , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[22]  Batya Friedman,et al.  Value-sensitive design , 1996, INTR.

[23]  Anthony Dunne,et al.  Design Noir: The Secret Life of Electronic Objects , 2001 .

[24]  Michal Migurski,et al.  Oakland Crimespotting , 2009, SIGGRAPH Art Gallery.

[25]  Philip E. Agre,et al.  Toward a Critical Technical Practice: Lessons Learned in Trying to Reform AI , 2006 .

[26]  Fritz Drury,et al.  Visualization Criticism , 2008, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[27]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  TIMELINESTag clouds and the case for vernacular visualization , 2008, INTR.

[28]  Martin Wattenberg,et al.  Artistic Data Visualization: Beyond Visual Analytics , 2007, HCI.