Combining Software-Defined and Delay-Tolerant Approaches in Last-Mile Tactical Edge Networking

Network-centric warfare is a no-way-back trend in modern military operations. The application of this concept ranges from upper-level decision making echelons to troop guidance on the battlefield, and many studies have been carried out in this area. However, most of these are concerned with either the higher-level strategic networks, that is, the networks linking the higher echelons with abundant resources, satellite communications, or even a whole network infrastructure, or high-end TEN, representing resource-rich troops in the field, with military aircraft, battleships, or ground vehicles equipped with powerful wireless communication devices and (almost) unrestricted energy resources for communication. However, these studies fail to take into account the "last-mile TEN," which comprises resource constrained communication devices carried by troopers, equipping sensor nodes deployed in the field or small unmanned aerial vehicles. In an attempt to fill this gap in the studies on battlefield networking, this article seeks to combine software-defined and delay-tolerant approaches to support the diverse range of strict requirements for applications in the last-mile TEN.

[1]  Lisandro Zambenedetti Granville,et al.  Software-defined networking: management requirements and challenges , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[2]  Kin K. Leung,et al.  Emulation-based study of dynamic service placement in mobile micro-clouds , 2015, MILCOM 2015 - 2015 IEEE Military Communications Conference.

[3]  Frank Eliassen,et al.  Self-Organization as a Supporting Paradigm for Military UAV Relay Networks , 2016, IEEE Communications Letters.

[4]  Cesare Stefanelli,et al.  Enabling the deployment of COTS applications in tactical edge networks , 2013, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[5]  Frank T. Johnsen,et al.  Toward federated mission networking in the tactical domain , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[6]  A. Neeraja,et al.  Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Cc by Improving Network Management with Software Defined Networking , 2022 .

[7]  Stephen Farrell,et al.  DTN: an architectural retrospective , 2008, IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications.

[8]  Hwee Pink Tan,et al.  Sensor OpenFlow: Enabling Software-Defined Wireless Sensor Networks , 2012, IEEE Communications Letters.

[9]  Jose M. Alcaraz Calero,et al.  Reliable full motion video services in disadvantaged tactical radio networks , 2016, 2016 International Conference on Military Communications and Information Systems (ICMCIS).

[10]  Bow-Nan Cheng,et al.  Design considerations in applying disruption tolerant networking to tactical edge networks , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  Ananthram Swami,et al.  The Internet of Battle Things , 2016, Computer.

[12]  Mario Gerla,et al.  Toward software-defined battlefield networking , 2016, IEEE Communications Magazine.