Urban Influence on Costs of Production in the Corn Belt

This article determines the relative technical efficiency of rural- and urban-influenced crop/livestock enterprises in the Corn Belt. Farmers in urban-influenced locations are less technically efficient than farmers in rural locations. During 1998–2000, stochastic production frontier procedures indicate that a 10% increase in urban influence leads to a close to 4% decrease in technical efficiency. The most successful urban-influenced farms have controlled costs as effectively as rural farms. They have tended to de-emphasize that nondairy livestock activities—particularly beef and hogs—do not rely extensively on off-farm income, and have relatively large, less residential/lifestyle operations compared to less successful urban-influenced farmers. However, our statistical analysis clearly bears out the refrain in popular literature that urban proximity raises the cost for, and decreases the viability of, traditional farms. Copyright 2006, Oxford University Press.

[1]  Shunfeng Song,et al.  Some Tests of Alternative Accessibility Measures: A Population Density Approach , 1996 .

[2]  Halina M. Zaleski,et al.  Technical, allocative and economic efficiencies in swine production in Hawaii: a comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches , 1999 .

[3]  M. Andrews,et al.  The Effects of Suburbanization on Agriculture , 1988 .

[4]  Off-Farm Work and Economic Performance: Comparing Crop and Livestock Farms , 2007 .

[5]  Robert Dubman,et al.  Variance Estimation With USDA's Farm Costs and Returns Surveys and Agricultural Resource Management Study Surveys. , 2000 .

[6]  W. Lockeretz.  Trends in farming near cities , 1986 .

[7]  S. M. Mazie.  Rural Conditions and Trends. , 1990 .

[8]  W. Lockeretz.  Secondary Effects on Midwestern Agriculture of Metropolitan Development and Decreases in Farmland , 1989 .

[9]  Phillip S. Kott,et al.  Using the Delete-a-Group Jackknife Variance Estimator in NASS Surveys , 2001 .

[10]  Z. Griliches.  The Demand for Fertilizer: An Economic Interpretation of a Technical Change , 1958 .

[11]  Urbanization Affects a Large Share of Farmland , 2022 .

[12]  Supply Response in the Northeastern Fresh Tomato Market: Cointegration and Error Correction Analysis , 1997, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[13]  A. Nelson.  TOWARD A NEW METROPOLIS: THE OPPORTUNITY TO REBUILD AMERICA , 2004 .

[14]  R. Lopez,et al.  SUPPLY RESPONSE IN THE NORTHEASTERN FRESH TOMATO MARKET , 1987 .

[15]  George E. Battese,et al.  Functional Forms of Stochastic Frontier Production Functions and Models for Technical Inefficiency Effects: A Comparative Study for Wheat Farmers in Pakistan , 1997 .

[16]  Frederick V. Waugh,et al.  Quality Factors Influencing Vegetable Prices , 1928 .

[17]  Agapi Somwaru,et al.  Agricultural Productivity Revisited , 1997 .

[18]  A. Alvarez,et al.  Using Cross‐Section Data to Adjust Technical Efficiency Indexes Estimated with Panel Data , 1999 .

[19]  R. Heimlich,et al.  AGRICULTURAL ADAPTATION TO URBANIZATION: FARM TYPES IN NORTHEAST METROPOLITAN AREAS , 1992 .

[20]  A. U.S.,et al.  FORMULATION AND ESTIMATION OF STOCHASTIC FRONTIER PRODUCTION FUNCTION MODELS , 2001 .

[21]  W. Meeusen,et al.  Efficiency Estimation from Cobb-Douglas Production Functions with Composed Error , 1977 .

[22]  B. Gardner.  Commercial Agriculture in Metropolitan Areas: Economics and Regulatory Issues , 1994, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[23]  Willis L. Peterson,et al.  Are Large Farms More Efficient , 1997 .

[24]  Tulika Narayan,et al.  The Joint Influence of Agricultural and Nonfarm Factors on Real Estate Values: An Application to the Mid‐Atlantic Region , 2001 .

[25]  Tim Coelli,et al.  A Guide to Frontier version 4. 1: A Computer Program for Stochastic Frontier Production and Cost Fu , 1996 .

[26]  T. Phipps,et al.  Agricultural Land Values under Urbanizing Influences , 1997 .

[27]  J. L. Harrison,et al.  The Government Printing Office , 1968, American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education.

[28]  M. Ahearn,et al.  Evidence of Capitalization of Direct Government Payments into U.S. Cropland Values , 1997 .

[29]  D. Berry.  Effects of Urbanization on Agricultural Activities , 1978 .

[30]  J. M. Larson,et al.  Agricultural Adaptation to Urbanization in Southeastern Pennsylvania , 2001, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[31]  Franz C. Palm,et al.  Wald Criteria for Jointly Testing Equality and Inequality , 1986 .

[32]  Richard Nehring,et al.  Levels of Farm Sector Productivity: An International Comparison , 2001 .

[33]  J. Herriges,et al.  Living with Hogs in Iowa: The Impact of Livestock Facilities on Rural Residential Property Values , 2003, Land Economics.

[34]  William A. Fischel.  The Urbanization of Agricultural Land: A Review of the National Agricultural Lands Study , 1982 .

[35]  G. Battese,et al.  A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data , 1995 .

[36]  I. Audirac.  Rural sustainable development in America , 1997 .

[37]  K. Wiebe,et al.  Urban Influence: Effects on U.S. Farmland Markets and Value , 2008 .

[38]  Raymond B. Palmquist.  Land as a Differentiated Factor of Production : A Hedonic Model and Its Implications for Welfare Measurement , 1989 .

[39]  G. Battese,et al.  Identification of Factors Which Influence the Technical Inefficiency of Indian Farmers , 1996 .

[40]  W. Boggess,et al.  Measuring Interactions among Urbanization, Land Use Regulations, and Public Finance , 2003 .

[41]  A. Adelaja,et al.  Land Values, Market Forces, and Declining Dairy Herd Size: Evidence from an Urban-Influenced Region , 1998, Agricultural and Resource Economics Review.

[42]  S. Pascoe,et al.  Technical efficiency, Dutch beam trawl fleet, Common Fisheries Policy, stochastic production frontier , 2001 .