Are operative delivery procedures in Greece socially conditioned?

Caesarean section rates have increased in Greece by almost 50% during the last 13 years. We conducted a study in Athens, Greece, to assess the importance of a series of medical and socioeconomic factors in the use of Caesarean section or operative vaginal procedures, rather than a non-operative process, for the delivery of singleton, liveborn babies of primiparous mothers. We used a case control approach to compare 444 babies delivered through a Caesarean section and 130 delivered through operative vaginal delivery with 1235 normally delivered babies in a public and a private hospital. Data were analysed through multiple logistic regression. Caesarean section was more commonly performed in older, shorter or overweight mothers and for high and low birth-weight babies, as well as in response to several obstetric complications and following in-vitro fertilization. A similar pattern was noted with respect to operative vaginal delivery, except that this procedure was not unusually frequent among overweight women and was not encountered in this study among children born after in-vitro fertilization. Caesarean section was performed twice as often in the public teaching hospital as in a private maternity hospital, and operative vaginal delivery was several times more common in the former than in the latter, after controlling for biomedical risk factors. The unequal distribution of operative delivery procedures between the public and the private hospital raises questions about the justification of their performance in a substantial fraction of deliveries, and indicates that social factors condition their use.

[1]  Y. Khairuddin,et al.  The predictive value of extremes of birth weight, mother's height and ethnic origin on the likelihood of emergency caesarean section. , 2010, Asia-Oceania journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[2]  A. Chang,et al.  The influence of obstetric workload on cesarean section rate. , 2010, Asia-Oceania journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[3]  J. Bignall Why are caesarean births in the UK increasing? , 1994, The Lancet.

[4]  A. Kaunitz,et al.  Cesarean section rates in teaching hospitals: a national survey. , 1994, Birth.

[5]  F. Stanley,et al.  Cesarean section and operative vaginal delivery in low-risk primiparous women, Western Australia. , 1994, American journal of public health.

[6]  R. Saywell,et al.  Trends in the frequency of cesarean delivery. A 21-year experience, 1970-1990. , 1994, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[7]  R. Bortolus,et al.  Vaginal operative deliveries in Italy , 1994, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[8]  M. Joffe,et al.  What is the optimal caesarean section rate? An outcome based study of existing variation. , 1994, Journal of epidemiology and community health.

[9]  Taffel Sm Cesarean delivery in the United States, 1990. , 1994 .

[10]  I. Ingemarsson,et al.  The cesarean section rate in Sweden: the end of the rise. , 1994, Birth.

[11]  P. Catalano,et al.  Examination of Factors Contributing to the Risk of Cesarean Delivery in Women With Gestational Diabetes , 1994, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  T. Henriksen,et al.  Indications for cesarean section in singleton pregnancies in two Danish counties with different cesarean section rates , 1994, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[13]  W. Savage,et al.  Caesarean section in Britain and the United States 12% or 24%: is either the right rate? , 1993, Social science & medicine.

[14]  A. Tussing,et al.  The effect of physician characteristics on clinical behavior: cesarean section in New York State. , 1993, Social science & medicine.

[15]  N. Gleicher,et al.  The Mount Sinai cesarean section reduction program: an update after 6 years. , 1993, Social science & medicine.

[16]  M. Pel,et al.  The rising trend for caesarean birth. , 1993, BMJ.

[17]  J. Minogue,et al.  Factors contributing to the increased cesarean birth rate in older parturient women. , 1993, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  A. Leyland Socioeconomic and racial differences in obstetric procedures. , 1993, American journal of public health.

[19]  J. Amy,et al.  Caesarean section rates in an African country. , 1993, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[20]  J. Peipert,et al.  Maternal Age: An Independent Risk Factor for Cesarean Delivery , 1993, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[21]  E. Keeler,et al.  Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section. , 1993, The Milbank quarterly.

[22]  E. Hemminki,et al.  Patterns of use of obstetrical interventions in 12 countries. , 1993, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[23]  J. Kendrick,et al.  Trends in obstetric operative procedures, 1980 to 1987. , 1992, American journal of public health.

[24]  Foote Aj,et al.  Review of obstetric operative intervention rates. , 1992 .

[25]  L. Fedele,et al.  Determinants of caesarean section rates in Italy , 1992, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[26]  C. Nair Trends in cesarean section deliveries in Canada. , 1991, Health reports.

[27]  M. Glasser Cesarean section: science or ritual surgery? , 1991, Medical hypotheses.

[28]  N. Breslow,et al.  Statistical methods in cancer research. Vol. 1. The analysis of case-control studies. , 1981 .