Simplified seismic assessment of infilled RC frame structures

Earthquake-induced structural damage, characterised by the exceedance of different damage states during ground shaking, is typically quantified using fragility curves generated through non-linear dynamic analyses often requiring a large computational effort. This level of effort has led to the necessity of simplified methods and approximate analysis tools. In this regard, SPO2IDA has emerged as a convenient tool for the assessment of structures. It relates a structure’s backbone characteristics to a set of incremental dynamic analysis (IDA) curves using static pushover analysis (SPO) results and a library of empirical fitting coefficients for the different branches of the idealised SPO backbone. It permits the quantification of structural performance up to structural collapse as a function of seismic intensity in a simple and efficient manner. It has been developed mainly for ductile structures that can be sufficiently represented via a SPO backbone with a certain ductile post-yield hardening followed by a post-peak degradation. This behaviour is quite representative of ductile RC and steel moment-resisting frames and has resulted in the tool being widely adopted. However, the same may not be observed when dealing with reinforced concrete (RC) frames with masonry infill, a structural typology that still requires significant addressing in the earthquake engineering field. The present study describes an extension to this methodology for structural typologies with a more particular backbone behaviour, typical of RC frames with masonry infill panels, since differences in backbone behaviour compared to typical structures render the extension of the original tool inappropriate and at times unconservative. Extensive analyses were conducted to investigate the behaviour and trends when pushing infilled RC frames up to complete structural collapse. A new library of empirical coefficients was then fitted and proposed by considering a large database of representative backbones to result in an extended SPO2IDA proposal for infilled RC frames. It is then shown how these coefficients provide a much-improved matching, when compared to the original tool for this specific case, both in terms of the produced IDA traces and also the drift-based mean annual rates of exceedance.

[1]  Francisco J. Crisafulli,et al.  PROPOSED MACRO-MODEL FOR THE ANALYSIS OF INFILLED FRAME STRUCTURES , 2007 .

[2]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Derivation of new SAC/FEMA performance evaluation solutions with second‐order hazard approximation , 2013 .

[3]  Venera Vukašinović,et al.  Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis that promotes FEMA 440 , 2007 .

[4]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  A practice‐oriented estimation of the failure probability of building structures , 2012 .

[5]  E. Miranda INELASTIC DISPLACEMENT RATIOS FOR STRUCTURES ON FIRM SITES , 2000 .

[6]  Sanja Hak,et al.  Damage Control for Clay Masonry Infills in the Design of RC Frame Structures , 2012 .

[7]  G. Verderame,et al.  Experimental assessment of the in-plane/out-of-plane interaction in unreinforced masonry infill walls , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[8]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  The Hysteretic Energy as a Performance Measure in Analytical Studies , 2018 .

[9]  Ricardo Monteiro,et al.  Probabilistic models for structures with bilinear demand‐intensity relationships , 2018, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics.

[10]  Timothy J. Sullivan,et al.  Probabilistic seismic assessment and retrofit considerations for Italian RC frame buildings , 2018, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[11]  Paolo Franchin,et al.  Existing Buildings: The New Italian Provisions for Probabilistic Seismic Assessment , 2014 .

[12]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[13]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Seismic performance, capacity and reliability of structures as seen through incremental dynamic analysis , 2002 .

[14]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Simplified non‐linear seismic analysis of infilled reinforced concrete frames , 2005 .

[15]  H. Crowley,et al.  Development of a Fragility Model for the Residential Building Stock in South America , 2017 .

[16]  Anthony B. Court SEISMIC PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT OF BUILDINGS - METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS - AN OVERVIEW OF FEMA P-58-4 , 2014 .

[17]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Inelastic spectra for infilled reinforced concrete frames , 2004 .

[18]  Humberto Varum,et al.  Experimental evaluation of out-of-plane capacity of masonry infill walls , 2016 .

[19]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  SPO2FRAG: software for seismic fragility assessment based on static pushover , 2017, Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering.

[20]  Paolo Bazzurro,et al.  Intensity Measures for the Collapse Assessment of Infilled RC Frames , 2018 .

[21]  Chen Qiao-sheng,et al.  A Brief Introduction of FEMA P695—Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors , 2013 .

[22]  Michael H. Scott,et al.  Nonlinear Finite-Element Analysis Software Architecture Using Object Composition , 2010, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[23]  Timothy J. Sullivan,et al.  Modeling Techniques for the Seismic Assessment of the Existing Italian RC Frame Structures , 2019 .

[24]  Peter Fajfar,et al.  Consistent inelastic design spectra: Strength and displacement , 1994 .

[25]  Jack W. Baker,et al.  Efficient Analytical Fragility Function Fitting Using Dynamic Structural Analysis , 2015 .

[26]  Dimitrios Vamvatsikos,et al.  Direct Estimation of Seismic Demand and Capacity of Multidegree-of-Freedom Systems through Incremental Dynamic Analysis of Single Degree of Freedom Approximation , 2005 .

[27]  A. Filiatrault,et al.  System Identification and Seismic Assessment Modeling Implications for Italian School Buildings , 2019, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities.

[28]  Gerard J. O'Reilly,et al.  Quantification of modelling uncertainty in existing Italian RC frames , 2018 .

[29]  A. Veletsos,et al.  Effect of Inelastic Behavior on the Response of Simple Systems to Earthquake Motions , 1975 .

[30]  D. Novák,et al.  Statistical correlation in stratified sampling , 2003 .

[31]  Andre Filiatrault,et al.  Seismic assessment and loss estimation of existing school buildings in Italy , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[32]  Gerard J. O’REILLY,et al.  On the seismic assessment and retrofit of infilled RC frames structures , 2018 .