Selectivity of propeptide-enzyme interaction in cathepsin L-like cysteine proteases

Abstract Cathepsin L-like endopeptidases of the papain family are synthesized as proenzymes. N-terminal proregions are essential for folding and latency of the enzyme unit. While selectivity has been reported for the inhibitory function of papain-family propeptides, there is no systematic investigation of the selectivity of their chaperone-like function to date. The chaperone-like cross-reactivity between the cathepsins S, K, and L were thoroughly quantified in trans-experiments, i.e., with isolated propeptides and mature enzymes, and compared to the inhibitory cross-reactivity. The three endopeptidases have been chosen due to only minimal evolutionary distance and nearly identical X-ray structures of their zymogenes. The intramolecular chaperone function of the proregion was found to be more selective than the inhibitory activity and significant differences were found between the selectivity profiles, underlining the assumption that the inhibitory and the chaperone-like propeptide functions are autonomous. Considering the data published on the intramolecular chaperone-like propeptide function within other protease classes as well, our data suggest that intrinsically structured propeptides are more selective than intrinsically unstructured propeptides, i.e., those adopting tertiary structure elements only in complex with their maternal enzyme.

[1]  B. Wiederanders,et al.  Optimized folding and activation of recombinant procathepsin L and S produced in Escherichia coli. , 2007, Protein expression and purification.

[2]  R. Hilgenfeld,et al.  THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE OF A CYS25ALA MUTANT OF HUMAN PROCATHEPSIN S , 2006 .

[3]  D. Agard,et al.  The folding landscape of an α‐lytic protease variant reveals the role of a conserved β‐hairpin in the development of kinetic stability , 2005 .

[4]  T. Fox,et al.  Investigation of protein refolding using a fractional factorial screen: A study of reagent effects and interactions , 2005, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[5]  Y. Yabuta,et al.  Folding pathway mediated by an intramolecular chaperone: intrinsically unstructured propeptide modulates stochastic activation of subtilisin. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[6]  K. Dill,et al.  Comprehensive analysis of protein folding activation thermodynamics reveals a universal behavior violated by kinetically stable proteases. , 2005, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  D. Agard,et al.  The folding landscape of an alpha-lytic protease variant reveals the role of a conserved beta-hairpin in the development of kinetic stability. , 2005, Proteins: Structure, Function, and Bioinformatics.

[8]  Y. Yabuta,et al.  Positive selection dictates the choice between kinetic and thermodynamic protein folding and stability in subtilases. , 2004, Biochemistry.

[9]  V. Turk,et al.  Human cathepsin F: expression in baculovirus system, characterization and inhibition by protein inhibitors , 2004, Biological chemistry.

[10]  B. Wiederanders,et al.  Functions of propeptide parts in cysteine proteases. , 2003, Current protein & peptide science.

[11]  R. Hilgenfeld,et al.  An unfolding/refolding step helps in the crystallization of a poorly soluble protein. , 2003, Acta Crystallographica Section D: Biological Crystallography.

[12]  I. Taylor,et al.  Identification of in vitro folding conditions for procathepsin S and cathepsin S using fractional factorial screens. , 2002, Protein expression and purification.

[13]  K. Schilling,et al.  Foldase Function of the Cathepsin S Proregion Is Strictly Based upon Its Domain Structure , 2002, Biological chemistry.

[14]  David A. Agard,et al.  Energetic landscape of a-lytic protease optimizes longevity through kinetic stability , 2022 .

[15]  D. Agard,et al.  Energetic landscape of alpha-lytic protease optimizes longevity through kinetic stability. , 2002, Nature.

[16]  H. Yanai,et al.  Accelerated refolding of subtilisin BPN' by tertiary-structure-forming mutants of its propeptide. , 2001, Journal of Biochemistry (Tokyo).

[17]  M. Inouye,et al.  Backbone dynamics of the natively unfolded pro-peptide of subtilisin by heteronuclear NMR relaxation studies , 2001, Journal of biomolecular NMR.

[18]  K. Schilling,et al.  Folding Incompetence of Cathepsin L-Like Cysteine Proteases May Be Compensated by the Highly Conserved, Domain-Building N-Terminal Extension of the Proregion , 2001, Biological chemistry.

[19]  H. Matsuzawa,et al.  Folding pathway mediated by an intramolecular chaperone: the structural and functional characterization of the aqualysin I propeptide. , 2001, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  J. Mort,et al.  The slow-binding inhibition of cathepsin K by its propeptide. , 2000, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[21]  J. Falgueyret,et al.  Potency and selectivity of inhibition of cathepsin K, L and S by their respective propeptides. , 2000, European journal of biochemistry.

[22]  M. Inouye,et al.  Folding Pathway Mediated by an Intramolecular Chaperone , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  J. Dalton,et al.  Phylogenetic relationships and theoretical model of human cathepsin W (lymphopain), a cysteine proteinase from cytotoxic T lymphocytes. , 2000, The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology.

[24]  Klaus Schittkowski,et al.  Parameter Estimation in Dynamic Systems , 2000 .

[25]  S. Takahashi,et al.  Proregion of Bombyx mori cysteine proteinase functions as an intramolecular chaperone to promote proper folding of the mature enzyme. , 1999, Archives of insect biochemistry and physiology.

[26]  R. Ménard,et al.  Crystal structure of wild‐type human procathepsin K , 1999, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[27]  H. Weinstein,et al.  Characterization of novel cathepsin K mutations in the pro and mature polypeptide regions causing pycnodysostosis. , 1999, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[28]  C. Debouck,et al.  The crystal structure of human procathepsin K. , 1999, Biochemistry.

[29]  H. Chapman,et al.  Human Cathepsin F , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  V. Turk,et al.  pH-induced Conformational Transitions of the Propeptide of Human Cathepsin L , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[31]  B. Wiederanders,et al.  The inhibition of cathepsin S by its propeptide--specificity and mechanism of action. , 1997, European journal of biochemistry.

[32]  M. Mcgrath,et al.  Expression of human cathepsin K in Pichia pastoris and preliminary crystallographic studies of an inhibitor complex , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[33]  R. Ménard,et al.  Structure of human procathepsin L reveals the molecular basis of inhibition by the prosegment. , 1996, The EMBO journal.

[34]  D. Rasch,et al.  Software for selection procedures. , 1996 .

[35]  R. Ménard,et al.  Potency and selectivity of the cathepsin L propeptide as an inhibitor of cysteine proteases. , 1996, Biochemistry.

[36]  K. Tao,et al.  The proregion of cathepsin L is required for proper folding, stability, and ER exit. , 1994, Archives of biochemistry and biophysics.

[37]  H. Kirschke,et al.  [34] Cathepsin S and related lysosomal endopeptidases , 1994 .

[38]  H. Kirschke,et al.  Cathepsin S and related lysosomal endopeptidases. , 1994, Methods in enzymology.

[39]  K. Karrer,et al.  Two distinct gene subfamilies within the family of cysteine protease genes. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  M. Gottesman,et al.  Activity and deletion analysis of recombinant human cathepsin L expressed in Escherichia coli. , 1989, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[41]  C. Walsh,et al.  The behavior and significance of slow-binding enzyme inhibitors. , 2006, Advances in enzymology and related areas of molecular biology.