Optimal Cooperative Pursuit and Evasion Strategies Against a Homing Missile

Optimal-control-based cooperative evasion and pursuit strategies are derived for an aircraft and its defending missile. The aircraft-defending missile team cooperates in actively protecting the aircraft from a homing missile. The cooperative strategies are derived assuming that the incoming homing missile is using a known linear guidance law. Linearized kinematics, arbitrary-order linear adversaries' dynamics, and perfect information are also assumed. Specific limiting cases are analyzed in which the attacking missile uses proportional navigation, augmented proportional navigation, or optimal guidance. The optimal one-on-one, noncooperative, aircraft evasion strategies from a missile using such guidance laws are also derived. For adversaries with first-order dynamics it is shown that depending on the initial conditions, and in contrast to the optimal one-on-one evasion strategy, the optimal cooperative target maneuver is either constant or arbitrary. These types of maneuvers are also the optimal ones for the defender missile. Simulation results confirm the usefulness and advantages of cooperation. Specifically, it is shown how the target can lure in the attacker, allowing its defender to intercept the attacking missile even in scenarios in which the defender's maneuverability is at a disadvantage compared with the attacking missile.

[1]  J. Shinar,et al.  Analysis of Optimal Evasive Maneuvers Based on a Linearized Two-Dimensional Kinematic Model , 1977 .

[2]  Shaul Gutman,et al.  Applied min-max approach to missile guidance and control , 2005 .

[3]  Tal Shima,et al.  Cooperative Multiple-Model Adaptive Guidance for an Aircraft Defending Missile , 2010 .

[4]  N. A. Shneydor,et al.  Comments on "Defending a Moving Target Against Missile or Topedo Attack" , 1977 .

[5]  R. Asher,et al.  Optimal Guidance with Maneuvering Targets , 1974 .

[6]  S. Miwa,et al.  Fighter evasive boundaries against missiles , 1989 .

[7]  Josef Shinar,et al.  The effects of non‐linear kinematics in optimal evasion , 1983 .

[8]  I. Rusnak,et al.  Guidance laws in defense against missile attack , 2008, 2008 IEEE 25th Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers in Israel.

[9]  Roger Boyell,et al.  Counterweapon Aiming for Defense of a Moving Target , 1980, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[10]  Roger Boyell,et al.  Defending a Moving Target Against Missile or Torpedo Attack , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[11]  V. Garber Optimum intercept laws for accelerating targets. , 1968 .

[12]  Paul M. Julich,et al.  Proportional navigation vs an optimally evading, constant-speed target in two dimensions , 1970 .

[13]  Arthur E. Bryson,et al.  Applied Optimal Control , 1969 .

[14]  R. G. Cottrell Optimal intercept guidance for short-range tactical missiles , 1971 .

[15]  Shaul Gutman,et al.  Proportional Navigation Miss Distance in the Presence of Bounded Inputs , 2009 .

[16]  Tal Shima,et al.  Line-of-Sight Interceptor Guidance for Defending an Aircraft , 2011 .

[17]  Tal Shima,et al.  Cooperative Differential Games Strategies for Active Aircraft Protection from a Homing Missile , 2010 .

[18]  J. Shinar,et al.  Analysis of Three-Dimensional Optimal Evasion with Linearized Kinematics , 1979 .

[19]  Paul Zarchan,et al.  Tactical and strategic missile guidance , 1990 .

[20]  Luke Chia‐Liu Yuan Homing and Navigational Courses of Automatic Target‐Seeking Devices , 1948 .