Advances in clone selection using high‐throughput bioreactors

Effective clone selection is a crucial step toward developing a robust mammalian cell culture production platform. Currently, clone selection is done by culturing cells in well plates and picking the highest producers. Ideally, clone selection should be done in a stirred tank bioreactor as this would best replicate the eventual production environment. The actual number of clones selected for future evaluation in bioreactors at bench‐scale is limited by the scale‐up and operational costs involved. This study describes the application of miniaturized stirred high‐throughput bioreactors (35 mL working volume; HTBRs) with noninvasive optical sensors for clone screening and selection. We investigated a method for testing several subclones simultaneously in a stirred environment using our high throughput bioreactors (up to 12 clones per HTBR run) and compared it with a traditional well plate selection approach. Importantly, it was found that selecting clones solely based on results from stationary well plate cultures could result in the chance of missing higher producing clones. Our approach suggests that choosing a clone after analyzing its performance in a stirred bioreactor environment is an improved method for clone selection. © 2010 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Biotechnol. Prog., 2010

[1]  D Weuster-Botz,et al.  Parallel substrate feeding and pH-control in shaking-flasks. , 2001, Biochemical engineering journal.

[2]  Mark R. Marten,et al.  Optical analysis of liquid mixing in a minibioreactor , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[3]  K. K. Frame,et al.  The loss of antibody productivity in continuous culture of hybridoma cells , 1990, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[4]  A. Dickson,et al.  Phenotypic variation during cloning procedures: Analysis of the growth behavior of clonal cell lines , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[5]  G. Rao,et al.  A study of oxygen transfer in shake flasks using a non‐invasive oxygen sensor , 2003, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[6]  Christoph Wittmann,et al.  Characterization and application of an optical sensor for quantification of dissolved O2 in shake-flasks , 2003, Biotechnology Letters.

[7]  Xudong Ge,et al.  Comparisons of optical pH and dissolved oxygen sensors with traditional electrochemical probes during mammalian cell culture , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[8]  K. Brorson,et al.  Immunoglobulin isotype switching in xid mice. , 1995, Molecular immunology.

[9]  M. Ritter,et al.  Monoclonal antibodies : production, engineering, and clinical application , 1995 .

[10]  A. Dickson,et al.  Characterization of the stability of recombinant protein production in the GS-NS0 expression system. , 2001, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[11]  Nicolas Szita,et al.  A well‐mixed, polymer‐based microbioreactor with integrated optical measurements , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[12]  Yordan Kostov,et al.  Design and performance of a 24‐station high throughput microbioreactor , 2006, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[13]  G. Rao,et al.  On the Possibility of Real‐Time Monitoring of Glucose in Cell Culture by Microdialysis Using a Fluorescent Glucose Binding Protein Sensor , 2008, Biotechnology progress.

[14]  L. J. Rubinstein,et al.  Murine immune response to the Neisseria meningitidis group C capsular polysaccharide. II. Specificity. , 1988, Journal of immunology.

[15]  Angélica Meneses-Acosta,et al.  Heterogeneous conditions in dissolved oxygen affect N‐glycosylation but not productivity of a monoclonal antibody in hybridoma cultures , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[16]  D Weuster-Botz,et al.  Development, parallelization, and automation of a gas-inducing milliliter-scale bioreactor for high-throughput bioprocess design (HTBD). , 2005, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[17]  Mohamed Al-Rubeai,et al.  Selection methods for high-producing mammalian cell lines. , 2007, Trends in biotechnology.

[18]  Lincoln Young,et al.  An actively mixed mini‐bioreactor for protein production from suspended animal cells , 2008, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[19]  Nicolas Szita,et al.  Membrane‐aerated microbioreactor for high‐throughput bioprocessing , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[20]  Xudong Ge,et al.  Validation of an optical sensor-based high-throughput bioreactor system for mammalian cell culture. , 2006, Journal of biotechnology.

[21]  Ashraf Amanullah,et al.  Twenty‐four‐well plate miniature bioreactor high‐throughput system: Assessment for microbial cultivations , 2007, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[22]  B H Junker,et al.  Fluorescence sensing of fermentation parameters using fiber optics , 1988, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[23]  H. Katinger,et al.  Screening for improved cell performance: selection of subclones with altered production kinetics or improved stability by cell sorting. , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[24]  Yordan Kostov,et al.  Dual Excitation Ratiometric Fluorescent pH Sensor for Noninvasive Bioprocess Monitoring: Development and Application , 2002, Biotechnology progress.

[25]  Jay D Keasling,et al.  Microbioreactor arrays with parametric control for high‐throughput experimentation , 2004, Biotechnology and bioengineering.

[26]  B Allen,et al.  Design of a prototype miniature bioreactor for high throughput automated bioprocessing , 2003 .

[27]  Ashraf Amanullah,et al.  Twenty‐four well plate miniature bioreactor system as a scale‐down model for cell culture process development , 2009, Biotechnology and bioengineering.