Social power and emotional experience: Actor and partner effects within dyadic interactions

Abstract A dyadic methodological and statistical approach to social power is used to test the notion that an individual’s power and a partner’s power have distinct effects on the individual’s emotional experience. Two studies examined actor and partner effects of social power on emotion within dyadic interactions. Across interpersonal contexts and measures of social power, the individual’s own social power, theorized to activate behavioral approach, was associated with positive emotion (an actor effect). In contrast, being subject to a partner’s elevated social power, theorized to activate behavioral inhibition, was associated with increased negative emotion (a partner effect). The discussion focuses on how dyadic methodological and statistical approaches point to new lines of inquiry in the study of social power.

[1]  R. Cattell.  The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors. , 1966, Multivariate behavioral research.

[2]  J. R. French,et al.  The bases of social power. , 1959 .

[3]  Jennifer L. Berdahl,et al.  Effects of power on emotion and expression during a controversial group discussion , 2006 .

[4]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Power Dependence in Individual Bargaining: The Expected Utility of Influence , 1979 .

[5]  K. Lewin,et al.  Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers , 1951 .

[6]  C. Carver,et al.  Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales , 1994 .

[7]  Mark Snyder,et al.  Power and the creation of patronizing environments: the stereotype-based behaviors of the powerful and their effects on female performance in masculine domains. , 2005, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[8]  J.,et al.  Journal of Experimental Social Psychology , 1965, Nature.

[9]  Bernadette Park,et al.  When power does not corrupt: superior individuation processes among powerful perceivers. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[10]  J. Copeland,et al.  Prophecies of power : motivational implications of social power for behavioral confirmation , 1994 .

[11]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The importance of similarity and understanding of partners' marital ideals to relationship satisfaction , 2001 .

[12]  S. Fiske,et al.  Power Can Bias Impression Processes: Stereotyping Subordinates by Default and by Design , 2000 .

[13]  M. Brauer,et al.  Social power , 2006 .

[14]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  The experience of power: examining the effects of power on approach and inhibition tendencies. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  Yaacov Trope,et al.  You focus on the forest when you're in charge of the trees: power priming and abstract information processing. , 2006, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  J. Bargh,et al.  Attitudes and Social Cognition Relationship Orientation as a Moderator of the Effects of Social Power , 2022 .

[17]  Jason W. Osborne,et al.  Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. , 2005 .

[18]  Dorwin Cartwright,et al.  Studies in Social Power. , 1960 .

[19]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  Relationship between attitudes and evaluative space: A critical review, with emphasis on the separability of positive and negative substrates. , 1994 .

[20]  Florence Geis,et al.  Nonverbal affect responses to male and female leaders: Implications for leadership evaluations. , 1990 .

[21]  Ana Guinote,et al.  Power affects basic cognition: Increased attentional inhibition and flexibility , 2007 .

[22]  C. Judd,et al.  Effects of power on perceived and objective group variability: evidence that more powerful groups are more variable. , 2002, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  N. Adler,et al.  The Role of Psychosocial Processes in Explaining the Gradient Between Socioeconomic Status and Health , 2003 .

[24]  D. Levine,et al.  A neuropsychological theory of positive affect and its influence on cognition. , 1999, Psychological review.

[25]  L. A. Pervin.  Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research , 1992 .

[26]  R. Sabatelli.  The Social Psychology of Groups , 2000 .

[27]  L. Tiedens,et al.  Anger and advancement versus sadness and subjugation: the effect of negative emotion expressions on social status conferral. , 2001, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  S. Fiske,et al.  Controlling other people. The impact of power on stereotyping. , 1993, The American psychologist.

[29]  Cameron Anderson,et al.  Power, Approach, and Inhibition , 2003 .

[30]  S. Fiske,et al.  Perceiving the Powerful: Intriguing Individuals versus Threatening Groups , 1999 .

[31]  E. Higgins,et al.  Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles , 1998 .

[32]  Joe C Magee,et al.  From power to action. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[33]  E. Berscheid,et al.  The Relationship Closeness Inventory : Assessing the Closeness of Interpersonal Relationships , 2004 .

[34]  The Powerholders , 1977 .

[35]  M. Brauer,et al.  Special Issue: Notes concerning the EJSP Thematic Issue on ‘Social Power’ , 2006 .

[36]  Richard Gonzalez,et al.  The correlational analysis of dyad‐level data in the distinguishable case , 1999 .

[37]  L. Melchior,et al.  Shyness, Self-Esteem, and Self-Consciousness , 1990 .

[38]  Arie W. Kruglanski,et al.  Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles, 2nd ed. , 2007 .

[39]  M. Snyder,et al.  Power in stereotypically masculine domains: a Social Influence Strategy X Stereotype Match model. , 2003, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[40]  D. Watson,et al.  Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[41]  R. Emerson.  Power-Dependence Relations: Two Experiments , 1964 .

[42]  O. John.  The "Big Five" factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. , 1990 .

[43]  Adam D. Galinsky,et al.  Published online in Wiley InterScience (www.interscience.wiley.com). DOI: 10.1002/ejsp.324 Power, optimism, and risk-taking , 2022 .

[44]  W. Cook,et al.  Interpersonal influence in family systems: a social relations model analysis. , 2001, Child development.

[45]  Marianne LaFrance,et al.  License or Obligation to Smile: The Effect of Power and Sex on Amount and Type of Smiling , 1998 .

[46]  R. Davidson.  Emotion and Affective Style: Hemispheric Substrates , 1992 .

[47]  A. Caspi,et al.  Teasing in hierarchical and intimate relations. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[48]  M. Smith.  Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers. , 1951 .

[49]  J. Gray,et al.  The neuropsychology of emotion and personality. , 1987 .

[50]  H. Leitenberg.  Handbook of social and evaluation anxiety , 1990 .