Advances in Modeling of Solidification Microstructures

In different manufacturing processes, such as casting, welding, and additive manufacturing, metallic materials go through solidification to produce parts with different sizes and shapes. Microstructures that develop during solidification control the property and performance of the manufactured parts, thereby predicting the solidification microstructures as functions of alloying composition and processing parameters is essential to control the quality of products. The multiscale nature of solidification microstructures, which depend on temperature distribution, solute concentration, capillary forces, and kinetic length, make the understanding and prediction of these microstructures exceptionally difficult. In recent years, and because of emergence of new and powerful supercomputers, it has become more feasible to computationally simulate the materials nanoand microstructures in large scales and with finest details. The computational models for solidification of metallic materials need to be developed based on the actual multiphysics of solidification, while considering the need for efficient numerical algorithms to solve the governing equations of the models. To quantitatively predict solidification microstructures, computational models at mesoscale need information from theory, experiments, lower scale models (e.g., density functional theory calculations, molecular dynamics simulations, etc.), and phase diagram calculations. The current computational models for simulating dendritic growth at the microscopic scale are based on different methods such as phase field (diffusive interface), level set, direct interface tracking, and cellular automaton methods. Each of these methods has its advantages and disadvantages: some can simulate the finest details of solidification microstructures with high accuracy, while others can simulate dendritic growth in large-scale domains with high computational efficiency. In this Journal of Metals topic, we present recent contributions in modeling of solidification microstructures. Damien Tourret et al. present a three-dimensional (3D) version of the dendritic needle network (DNN) model for directional solidification. They apply the DNN model to predict the stable range of primary dendritic spacings for an Al-9.8 wt%Si alloy over a range of growth velocities. They compare their predictions to spacings measured from in situ x-ray imaging of directional solidification experiments. Mohsen Eshraghi et al. present a parallel 3D lattice Boltzmann-cellular automaton model to simulate dendritic growth during solidification of metallic binary alloys. Their large-scale simulations show a great scale-up performance up to 40,000 computing cores and an excellent speed-up performance on up to 1000 computing cores. Yasushi Shibuta and co-workers performed simulations of solidification from atomic to microstructural levels using a graphics processing unit (GPU) architecture. They use million-atom molecular dynamics simulations to study nucleation of solid phase in undercooled melt and to capture evolution of anisotropy for solid seeds. Using a quantitative phasefield model, they simulate dendrite growth in directional solidification at millimeter scale in two– dimensional (2D) and 3D by multi-GPU computation on a supercomputer. These two articles present promising techniques to predict solidification microstructures in large macro-scale domains with good computational efficiency. Alexander Monas et al. present 3D phase-field simulations of solidification microstructures of MgAl alloy. They use the Calphad method to obtain the phase diagram and necessary parameters for their simulations. Michael Rappaz and Guven Kurtuldu discuss a new nucleation mechanism in liquid metallic alloys based on thermodynamics arguments. They explain that the two-step nucleation mechanism starts with Mohsen Asle Zaeem is the guest editor for the Solidification Committee of the TMS Materials Processing & Manufacturing Division, and coordinator of the topic Advances in Modeling of Solidification Microstructures in this issue. JOM, Vol. 67, No. 8, 2015

[1]  M. Horstemeyer,et al.  Investigating thermal effects on morphological evolution during crystallisation of hcp metals: three-dimensional phase field study , 2012 .

[2]  A. Karma,et al.  Quantitative phase-field modeling of dendritic growth in two and three dimensions , 1996 .

[3]  M. Zhu,et al.  Modified cellular automaton model for the prediction of dendritic growth with melt convection. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Sergio D. Felicelli,et al.  Modeling dendritic solidification of Al–3%Cu using cellular automaton and phase-field methods , 2013 .

[5]  Juan C. Heinrich,et al.  Front-tracking finite element method for dendritic solidification: 765 , 2001 .

[6]  John E. Dolbow,et al.  Solving thermal and phase change problems with the eXtended finite element method , 2002 .

[7]  S. Felicelli,et al.  Simulation of a dendritic microstructure with the lattice Boltzmann and cellular automaton methods , 2011 .

[8]  S. Felicelli,et al.  Comparison of Cellular Automaton and Phase Field Models to Simulate Dendrite Growth in Hexagonal Crystals , 2012 .

[9]  Dantzig,et al.  Computation of dendritic microstructures using a level set method , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[10]  S. Felicelli,et al.  A cellular automaton model for dendrite growth in magnesium alloy AZ91 , 2009 .

[11]  R. Kobayashi Modeling and numerical simulations of dendritic crystal growth , 1993 .

[12]  A. Karma,et al.  Three-Dimensional Multiscale Modeling of Dendritic Spacing Selection During Al-Si Directional Solidification , 2015 .

[13]  A. Karma,et al.  Phase-Field Simulation of Solidification , 2002 .

[14]  Nikolas Provatas,et al.  A quantitative multi-phase field model of polycrystalline alloy solidification , 2010 .

[15]  S. Osher,et al.  Level set methods: an overview and some recent results , 2001 .