Anthropogenic CO2 emission estimates in the Tokyo metropolitan area from ground-based CO2 column observations

. Urban areas are responsible for more than 40 % of global energy-related carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) emissions. The Tokyo Metropolitan Area (TMA), Japan, one of the most populated regions in the world, includes various emission sources, such as thermal power plants, automobile traffic, and residential facilities. We conducted an intensive field campaign in the 15 TMA from February to April 2016 to measure column-averaged dry-air mole fractions of CO 2 (XCO 2 ) with three ground-based Fourier transform spectrometers (one IFS 125HR and two EM27/SUN spectrometers). At two urban sites (Saitama and Sodegaura), measured XCO 2 values were generally larger than those at a rural site (Tsukuba) by up to 9.5 ppm, and average diurnal variations increased toward evening. To simulate the XCO 2 enhancement ( D XCO 2 ) resulting from emissions at each observation site, we used the Stochastic Time‐Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) model driven by meteorological fields 20 at a horizontal resolution of ~1 km from the Weather Research Forecast (WRF) model, which was coupled with anthropogenic (large point source and nonpoint source) CO 2 emissions and biogenic fluxes. Although some of the diurnal variation of D XCO 2 was not reproduced and plumes from nearby large point sources were not captured, primarily because of a transport modeling error, the WRF–STILT simulations using prior fluxes were generally in good agreement with the observations (mean bias, 0.30 ppm; standard deviation, 1.31 ppm). By combining observations with high-resolution modeling, we developed an urban-25 scale inversion system in which spatially resolved CO 2 emission fluxes at >3 km resolution and a scaling factor of large point source emissions were estimated on a monthly basis by using Bayesian inference. The D XCO 2 simulation results from the posterior CO 2 fluxes were improved (mean bias, –0.03 ppm; standard deviation, 1.21 ppm). In addition, the inverse analysis reduced the uncertainty in total CO 2 emissions in the TMA by a factor of ∼ 2. The posterior total CO 2 emissions agreed with emission inventories within the posterior uncertainty at the 95 % confidence level, demonstrating that the EM27/SUN 30 spectrometer data can constrain urban-scale monthly CO 2 emissions.

[1]  P. Ciais,et al.  Assessing the Effectiveness of an Urban CO2 Monitoring Network over the Paris Region through the COVID-19 Lockdown Natural Experiment. , 2022, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  T. Matsunaga,et al.  Quantifying CO2 emissions from a thermal power plant based on CO2 column measurements by portable Fourier transform spectrometers , 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment.

[3]  M. Dubey,et al.  Assessing urban methane emissions using column-observing portable Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectrometers and a novel Bayesian inversion framework , 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[4]  Y. Kikegawa,et al.  Anthropogenic CO2 Emissions Changes in an Urban Area of Tokyo, Japan, Due to the COVID‐19 Pandemic: A Case Study During the State of Emergency in April–May 2020 , 2021, Geophysical Research Letters.

[5]  I. Baker,et al.  SiB4 Modeled Global 0.5-Degree Hourly Carbon Fluxes and Productivity, 2000-2018 , 2021 .

[6]  T. Blumenstock,et al.  The CO2 integral emission by the megacity of St. Petersburg as quantified from ground-based FTIR measurements combined with dispersion modelling , 2021, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[7]  John C. Lin,et al.  Constraining Urban CO2 Emissions Using Mobile Observations from a Light Rail Public Transit Platform. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  C. Frankenberg,et al.  Observed Impacts of COVID‐19 on Urban CO2 Emissions , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[9]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA5 global reanalysis , 2020, Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society.

[10]  Arne Babenhauserheide,et al.  Net CO2 fossil fuel emissions of Tokyo estimated directly from measurements of the Tsukuba TCCON site and radiosondes , 2020 .

[11]  P. Shepson,et al.  Fluxes of Atmospheric Greenhouse‐Gases in Maryland (FLAGG‐MD): Emissions of Carbon Dioxide in the Baltimore, MD‐Washington, D.C. Area , 2020, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[12]  Eric A. Kort,et al.  Constraining Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions From Urban Area Using OCO‐2 Observations of Total Column CO2 , 2020, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[13]  R. Duren,et al.  Synthesis of Methane Observations Across Scales: Strategies for Deploying a Multitiered Observing Network , 2020, Geophysical Research Letters.

[14]  A. Karion,et al.  Wintertime CO2, CH4 and CO emissions estimation for the Washington DC / Baltimore metropolitan area using an inverse modeling technique. , 2020, Environmental science & technology.

[15]  P. Wessel,et al.  Global Bathymetry and Topography at 15 Arc Sec: SRTM15+ , 2019, Earth and Space Science.

[16]  P. Ciais,et al.  Analysis of temporal and spatial variability of atmospheric CO2 concentration within Paris from the GreenLITE™ laser imaging experiment , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[17]  I. Pisso,et al.  Assessing Lagrangian inverse modelling of urban anthropogenic CO2 fluxes using in situ aircraft and ground-based measurements in the Tokyo area , 2019, Carbon Balance and Management.

[18]  Yang Song,et al.  Comparison of Global Downscaled Versus Bottom‐Up Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions at the Urban Scale in Four U.S. Urban Areas , 2019, Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres.

[19]  F. Hase,et al.  Analysis of total column CO2 and CH4 measurements in Berlin with WRF-GHG , 2019, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[20]  Kevin R. Gurney,et al.  Southern California megacity CO2, CH4, and CO flux estimates using ground- and space-based remote sensing and a Lagrangian model , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[21]  K. Davis,et al.  Impact of physical parameterizations and initial conditions on simulated atmospheric transport and CO2 mole fractions in the US Midwest , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[22]  A. Ito Disequilibrium of terrestrial ecosystem CO2 budget caused by disturbance-induced emissions and non-CO2 carbon export flows: a global model assessment , 2018, Earth System Dynamics.

[23]  P. Ciais,et al.  XCO2 in an emission hot-spot region: the COCCON Paris campaign 2015 , 2018, Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics.

[24]  Daniel Mendoza,et al.  Simulating atmospheric tracer concentrations for spatially distributed receptors: updates to the Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport model's R interface (STILT-R version 2) , 2018, Geoscientific Model Development.

[25]  Colm Sweeney,et al.  Anthropogenic and biogenic CO2 fluxes in the Boston urban region , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[26]  D. Wunch,et al.  Building the COllaborative Carbon Column Observing Network (COCCON): long-term stability and ensemble performance of the EM27/SUN Fourier transform spectrometer , 2018, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques.

[27]  S. Chatani,et al.  Effects of a Detailed Vegetation Database on Simulated Meteorological Fields, Biogenic VOC Emissions, and Ambient Pollutant Concentrations over Japan , 2018 .

[28]  Conor K. Gately,et al.  Large Uncertainties in Urban‐Scale Carbon Emissions , 2017 .

[29]  K. Davis,et al.  High‐resolution atmospheric inversion of urban CO2 emissions during the dormant season of the Indianapolis Flux Experiment (INFLUX) , 2016, Journal of geophysical research. Atmospheres : JGR.

[30]  Stanley G. Benjamin,et al.  Modifications to the Rapid Update Cycle Land Surface Model (RUC LSM) Available in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) Model , 2016 .

[31]  J. Orphal,et al.  Application of portable FTIR spectrometers for detecting greenhouse gas emissions of the major city Berlin , 2015 .

[32]  A. Inaba,et al.  Human Settlements, Infrastructure and Spatial Planning , 2014 .

[33]  M. Fischer,et al.  A multitower measurement network estimate of California's methane emissions , 2013 .

[34]  Kevin R. Gurney,et al.  Improving the temporal and spatial distribution of CO2 emissions from global fossil fuel emission data sets , 2013 .

[35]  Frank Hase,et al.  XCO 2 -measurements with a tabletop FTS using solar absorption spectroscopy , 2012 .

[36]  S. Wofsy,et al.  Assessment of ground-based atmospheric observations for verification of greenhouse gas emissions from an urban region , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[37]  Motoko Inatomi,et al.  Water-Use Efficiency of the Terrestrial Biosphere: A Model Analysis Focusing on Interactions between the Global Carbon and Water Cycles , 2012 .

[38]  J. Dudhia,et al.  A Revised Scheme for the WRF Surface Layer Formulation , 2012 .

[39]  J. Dudhia,et al.  Improving the representation of resolved and unresolved topographic effects on surface wind in the WRF model , 2012 .

[40]  Justus Notholt,et al.  The Total Carbon Column Observing Network , 2011, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[41]  J. Thepaut,et al.  The ERA‐Interim reanalysis: configuration and performance of the data assimilation system , 2011 .

[42]  Uang,et al.  The NCEP Climate Forecast System Reanalysis , 2010 .

[43]  John C. Lin,et al.  Coupled weather research and forecasting–stochastic time-inverted lagrangian transport (WRF–STILT) model , 2010 .

[44]  H. Niino,et al.  Development of an Improved Turbulence Closure Model for the Atmospheric Boundary Layer , 2009 .

[45]  Martijn Gough Climate change , 2009, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[46]  G. Thompson,et al.  Explicit Forecasts of Winter Precipitation Using an Improved Bulk Microphysics Scheme. Part II: Implementation of a New Snow Parameterization , 2008 .

[47]  John C. Lin,et al.  Vertical mixing in atmospheric tracer transport models: error characterization and propagation , 2007 .

[48]  John C. Gille,et al.  Comparative inverse analysis of satellite (MOPITT) and aircraft (TRACE-P) observations to estimate Asian sources of carbon monoxide , 2004 .

[49]  James T. Randerson,et al.  Differences between surface and column atmospheric CO2 and implications for carbon cycle research , 2004 .

[50]  John C. Lin,et al.  A near-field tool for simulating the upstream influence of atmospheric observations: The Stochastic Time-Inverted Lagrangian Transport (STILT) model , 2003 .

[51]  Clive D Rodgers,et al.  Inverse Methods for Atmospheric Sounding: Theory and Practice , 2000 .

[52]  B. Connor,et al.  Intercomparison of remote sounding instruments , 1999 .

[53]  Z. Janjic The Step-Mountain Eta Coordinate Model: Further Developments of the Convection, Viscous Sublayer, and Turbulence Closure Schemes , 1994 .

[54]  G. Stout,et al.  Atmospheric research. , 1973, Science.

[55]  C. Gerbig,et al.  Understanding greenhouse gas (GHG) column concentrations in Munich using WRF , 2022 .

[56]  T. Blumenstock,et al.  Emission Monitoring Mobile Experiment (EMME): an overview and first results of the St. Petersburg megacity campaign-2019 , 2020 .

[57]  J. Burrows,et al.  Validation of XCO2 and XCH4 retrieved from a portable Fourier transform spectrometer with those from in-situ profiles from aircraft borne instruments , 2020 .

[58]  Muntean Marilena,et al.  Fossil CO2 and GHG emissions of all world countries , 2017 .

[59]  M. Ha-Duong,et al.  Climate change 2014 - Mitigation of climate change , 2015 .

[60]  Craig S. Long,et al.  The NCEP climate forecast system reanalysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc , 2010 .

[61]  G. Powers,et al.  A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 3 , 2008 .

[62]  John S. Kain,et al.  The Kain–Fritsch Convective Parameterization: An Update , 2004 .