Modulus prediction of buckypaper based on multi-fidelity analysis involving latent variables

Buckypapers are thin sheets produced from Carbon NanoTubes (CNTs) that effectively transfer the exceptional mechanical properties of CNTs to bulk materials. To accomplish a sensible tradeoff between effectiveness and efficiency in predicting the mechanical properties of CNT buckypapers, a multi-fidelity analysis appears necessary, combining costly but high-fidelity physical experiment outputs with affordable but low-fidelity Finite Element Analysis (FEA)-based simulation responses. Unlike the existing multi-fidelity analysis reported in the literature, not all of the input variables in the FEA simulation code are observable in the physical experiments; the unobservable ones are the latent variables in our multi-fidelity analysis. This article presents a formulation for multi-fidelity analysis problems involving latent variables and further develops a solution procedure based on nonlinear optimization. In a broad sense, this latent variable-involved multi-fidelity analysis falls under the category of non-isometric matching problems. The performance of the proposed method is compared with both a single-fidelity analysis and the existing multi-fidelity analysis without considering latent variables, and the superiority of the new method is demonstrated, especially when we perform extrapolation.

[1]  Yu Ding,et al.  Bayesian hierarchical model for combining misaligned two-resolution metrology data , 2011 .

[2]  Dick den Hertog,et al.  Constrained Maximin Designs for Computer Experiments , 2003, Technometrics.

[3]  Wei Chen,et al.  A better understanding of model updating strategies in validating engineering models , 2009 .

[4]  James O. Berger,et al.  A Framework for Validation of Computer Models , 2007, Technometrics.

[5]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Gaussian processes for machine learning , 2005, Adaptive computation and machine learning.

[6]  Alyson G. Wilson,et al.  Integrated Analysis of Computer and Physical Experiments , 2004, Technometrics.

[7]  Peter Z. G. Qian,et al.  Sliced space-filling designs , 2009 .

[8]  Sonja Kuhnt,et al.  Design and analysis of computer experiments , 2010 .

[9]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Bayesian calibration of computer models , 2001 .

[10]  Carolyn Conner Seepersad,et al.  Building Surrogate Models Based on Detailed and Approximate Simulations , 2004, DAC 2004.

[11]  Kan Wang,et al.  Statistics-Enhanced Multistage Process Models For Integrated Design & Manufacturing Of Poly (vinyl Alcohol) Treated Buckypaper , 2013 .

[12]  Michael Goldstein,et al.  Reified Bayesian modelling and inference for physical systems , 2009 .

[13]  Robert Tibshirani,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction, 2nd Edition , 2001, Springer Series in Statistics.

[14]  Ashutosh Kumar Singh,et al.  The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining, Inference, and Prediction , 2010 .

[15]  Ben Wang,et al.  Processing and property investigation of single-walled carbon nanotube (SWNT) buckypaper/epoxy resin matrix nanocomposites , 2004 .

[16]  Haifeng Xia Bayesian Hierarchical Model for Combining Two-resolution Metrology Data , 2010 .

[17]  Dave Higdon,et al.  Combining Field Data and Computer Simulations for Calibration and Prediction , 2005, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[18]  A. O'Hagan,et al.  Predicting the output from a complex computer code when fast approximations are available , 2000 .

[19]  M. E. Johnson,et al.  Minimax and maximin distance designs , 1990 .

[20]  J. Ramsay Estimating smooth monotone functions , 1998 .

[21]  Shifeng Xiong,et al.  Sequential Design and Analysis of High-Accuracy and Low-Accuracy Computer Codes , 2013, Technometrics.

[22]  D. Rubin,et al.  Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM - algorithm plus discussions on the paper , 1977 .

[23]  J. Rougier,et al.  Bayes Linear Calibrated Prediction for Complex Systems , 2006 .

[24]  S. Iijima Helical microtubules of graphitic carbon , 1991, Nature.

[25]  Peter Z. G. Qian Sliced Latin Hypercube Designs , 2012 .

[26]  Ben Wang,et al.  Elastic property prediction of single-walled carbon nanotube buckypaper/polymer nanocomposites: stochastic bulk response modeling. , 2011, Journal of nanoscience and nanotechnology.

[27]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Non-collapsing Space-filling Designs for Bounded Non-rectangular Regions , 2011 .

[28]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Noncollapsing Space-Filling Designs for Bounded Nonrectangular Regions , 2012, Technometrics.

[29]  L. Mark Berliner,et al.  Combining Information Across Spatial Scales , 2005, Technometrics.

[30]  Peter Z. G. Qian,et al.  Bayesian Hierarchical Modeling for Integrating Low-Accuracy and High-Accuracy Experiments , 2008, Technometrics.

[31]  V. R. Joseph,et al.  Statistical Adjustments to Engineering Models , 2009 .

[32]  Thomas J. Santner,et al.  Simultaneous Determination of Tuning and Calibration Parameters for Computer Experiments , 2009, Technometrics.