The influence of surface treatment on hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation of silicone hydrogel contact lenses.

PURPOSE To evaluate the influence of surface treatment of silicone-hydrogel CL on lens hydrophobicity, protein adsorption and microbial colonisation by studying several silicone hydrogel contact lenses (CL) with and without surface treatment. The lenses used in this study were Balafilcon A, Lotrafilcon A, Lotrafilcon B and Galyfilcon A. A conventional hydrogel CL (Etafilcon A) was also tested. METHODS Hydrophobicity was determined through contact angle measurement using the advancing type technique on air. The type and quantity of proteins adsorbed were assessed through SDS-PAGE and fluorescence spectroscopy, respectively. Microbial colonisation was studied by removing the microbes from the lenses through sonication, and counting the colony-forming units on agar plates. RESULTS Regarding hydrophobicity, both surface and non-surface-treated silicone hydrogel CL were found to be hydrophobic, and the conventional hydrogel CL was found to be hydrophilic. Concerning protein adsorption, different protein profiles were observed on the several lenses tested. Nevertheless, the presence of proteins with the same molecular weight as lysozyme and lactoferrin was common to all lenses, which is probably related to their abundance in tears. In terms of total protein adsorption, silicone hydrogel CL did not exhibit any differences between themselves. However, the conventional hydrogel Etafilcon A adsorbed a larger amount of proteins. Regarding microbial colonisation, Balafilcon A exhibited the greatest amount of colonising microbes, which can be due to its superior hydrophobicity and higher electron acceptor capacity. CONCLUSION This study suggests that silicone hydrogel lenses adsorb a lower amount of proteins than the conventional hydrogel lenses and that this phenomenon is independent of the presence of surface treatment. Concerning microbial colonisation, the surface treated Balafilcon A, exhibited a greater propensity, a fact that may compromise the lens wearer's ocular health.

[1]  B. Holden,et al.  Contact Lens Related Corneal Infections , 2001, Bioscience reports.

[2]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Bacterial adhesion to surface hydrophilic and hydrophobic contact lenses. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[3]  S. Muller,et al.  Wettability of silicone-hydrogel contact lenses in the presence of tear-film components , 2004, Current eye research.

[4]  R. F. Giese,et al.  The Hydrophilicity and Hydrophobicity of Clay Minerals , 1995 .

[5]  C. Hull,et al.  Surface wettability and hydrophilicity of soft contact lens materials, before and after wear. , 1995, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[6]  J. C. Salamone,et al.  In vitro deposition of lysozyme on etafilcon A and balafilcon A hydrogel contact lenses: effects on adhesion and survival of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. , 2005, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[7]  M. Senchyna,et al.  Lysozyme and Lipid Deposition on Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials , 2003, Eye & contact lens.

[8]  C STEVEN BAILEY,et al.  Contact Lens Complications , 2000, The British journal of ophthalmology.

[9]  L. Nazar,et al.  In vitro evaluation of the dehydration characteristics of silicone hydrogel and conventional hydrogel contact lens materials. , 2002, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[10]  N. Efron,et al.  CHAPTER 15 – Contact Lens Complications , 2007 .

[11]  M. Refojo,et al.  Microscopic observation of unworn siloxane-hydrogel soft contact lenses by atomic force microscopy. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[12]  D. Packham.  Surface energy, surface topography and adhesion , 2003 .

[13]  J. A. Hubbell,et al.  Surface Treatments of Polymers for Biocompatibility , 1996 .

[14]  M. Noroozi,et al.  Experimental study of albumin and lysozyme adsorption onto acrylic acid (AA) and 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) surfaces. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[15]  Alexey S. Ladokhin,et al.  Fluorescence Spectroscopy in Peptide and Protein Analysis , 2006 .

[16]  Nathan Efron,et al.  Water properties of soft contact lens materials. , 2004, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[17]  E. Keith,et al.  Adhesion of tear proteins to contact lenses and vials , 2001, Biotechnology and applied biochemistry.

[18]  D. Keith,et al.  A novel procedure for the extraction of protein deposits from soft hydrophilic contact lenses for analysis. , 1997, Current eye research.

[19]  Silicone hydrogels – Adverse events , the epithelium in extended wear , and inflammation and infection in the closed eye 34 THE REBIRTH OF EXTENDED WEAR , .

[20]  R. Sariri.  Protein Interaction with Hydrogel Contact Lenses , 2004 .

[21]  L. Subbaraman.  Lysozyme Deposition Studies on Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens Materials , 2005 .

[22]  Rosário Oliveira,et al.  Adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus epidermidis to Silicone–Hydrogel Contact Lenses , 2005, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[23]  David J. Evans,et al.  The pathogenesis of bacterial keratitis: studies with Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2002, Clinical & experimental optometry.

[24]  J. Larke.  The Eye in Contact Lens Wear , 1997 .

[25]  M. Gónzalez-Martín,et al.  The adhesion strength of Candida parapsilosis to glass and silicone as a function of hydrophobicity, roughness and cell morphology , 2004 .

[26]  Noel Brennan,et al.  Silicone hydrogels – What are they and how should they be used in everyday practice ? , 2022 .

[27]  A. Lloyd,et al.  Ocular biomaterials and implants. , 2001, Biomaterials.

[28]  N. Pritchard,et al.  Subjective and objective measures of corneal staining related to multipurpose care systems. , 2003, Contact lens & anterior eye : the journal of the British Contact Lens Association.

[29]  Buddy D. Ratner,et al.  Biomaterials Science: An Introduction to Materials in Medicine , 1996 .