When Categorization is Ambiguous: Factors that Facilitate and Inhibit the Use of a Multiple (Versus Single) Category Inference Strategy

Prior research has established that categorization plays a central role in new product learning (Sujan, 1985). Very little is known, however, about the operation of this commonly studied category-based learning process under conditions of categorization ambiguity. Categorization ambiguity exists when information about a new product makes it difficult or impossible to place the novel offering in a single, existing category. Many of the new technological innovations hitting the market today fit this profile, as they often combine the features and functionality of existing products to create a single hybrid product. For example, there are personal digital assistants (PDAs) with cell phone functions and cell phones with PDA functions. The categorization of these products is highly ambiguous because, in both cases, the hybrid could logically be considered either a PDA or a cell phone.

[1]  Karen H. Smith,et al.  Some Effects of Schematic Processing on Consumer Expectations and Disconfirmation Judgments , 1992 .

[2]  S W Elliott,et al.  Effect of memory decay on predictions from changing categories. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[3]  A. Markman,et al.  Entrenched Knowledge Structures and Consumer Response to New Products , 2001 .

[4]  M. Sujan,et al.  Consumer Knowledge: Effects on Evaluation Strategies Mediating Consumer Judgments , 1985 .

[5]  Susan Carey,et al.  Developmental changes within the core of artifact concepts , 2001, Cognition.

[6]  Alice M. Tybout,et al.  Schema Congruity as a Basis for Product Evaluation , 1989 .

[7]  B. Ross,et al.  Induction with cross-classified categories , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[8]  B. Ross,et al.  Category-based predictions: influence of uncertainty and feature associations. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[10]  Gail D. Heyman,et al.  Preschool children's use of novel predicates to make inductive inferences about people , 2000 .

[11]  D. Dennett The Intentional Stance. , 1987 .

[12]  Judy E. Florian,et al.  Stripes do not a zebra make, or do they? Conceptual and perceptual information in inductive inference. , 1994 .

[13]  F. Roncaroli,et al.  What is it? , 1998 .

[14]  L. Rips Similarity, typicality, and categorization , 1989 .

[15]  A. Markman,et al.  Inference using categories. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[16]  A. Milne,et al.  The dissection of selection in person perception: inhibitory processes in social stereotyping. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  Barbara C. Malt,et al.  Do artifact concepts have cores , 1992 .

[18]  B. Ross,et al.  Predictions From Uncertain Categorizations , 1994, Cognitive Psychology.

[19]  A. Markman,et al.  “What Is It?” Categorization Flexibility and Consumers' Responses to Really New Products , 2001 .

[20]  J. Bettman,et al.  The Effects of Brand Positioning Strategies on Consumers’ Brand and Category Perceptions: Some Insights from Schema Research , 1989 .

[21]  L. Komatsu,et al.  Defining features of natural kinds and artifacts , 1989 .

[22]  D. Medin,et al.  Comments on part I: psychological essentialism , 1989 .

[23]  Julie L. Ozanne,et al.  A Study of Information Search Behavior during the Categorization of New Products , 1992 .

[24]  Merrie Brucks,et al.  Selective Recall and Information Use in Consumer Preferences , 1992 .

[25]  B. Ross,et al.  Predicting features for members of natural categories when categorization is uncertain. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.