Quantitative evaluation of free-form deformation registration for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR mammography.

In this paper, we present an evaluation study of a set of registration strategies for the alignment of sequences of 3D dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast images. The accuracy of the optimal registration strategies was determined on unseen data. The evaluation is based on the simulation of physically plausible breast deformations using finite element methods and on contrast-enhanced image pairs without visually detectable motion artifacts. The configuration of the finite element model was chosen according to its ability to predict in vivo breast deformations for two volunteers. We computed transformations for ten patients with 12 simulated deformations each. These deformations were applied to the postcontrast image to model patient motion occurring between pre- and postcontrast image acquisition. The original precontrast images were registered to the corresponding deformed postcontrast images. The performance of several registration configurations (rigid, affine, B-spline based nonrigid, single-resolution, multi-resolution, and volume-preserving) was optimized for five of the ten patients. The images were most accurately aligned with volume-preserving single-resolution nonrigid registration employing 40 or 20 mm control point spacing. When tested on the remaining five patients the optimal configurations reduced the average mean registration error from 1.40 to 0.45 mm for the whole breast tissue and from 1.20 to 0.32 mm for the enhancing lesion. These results were obtained on average within 26 (81) min for 40 (20) mm control point spacing. The visual appearance of the difference images from 30 patients was significantly improved after 20 mm volume-preserving single-resolution nonrigid registration in comparison to no registration or rigid registration. No substantial volume changes within the region of the enhancing lesions were introduced by this nonrigid registration.

[1]  T. Wong,et al.  Automatic motion correction for breast MR imaging. , 1996, Radiology.

[2]  Michael Brady,et al.  Simultaneous Segmentation and Registration of Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI , 2005, IPMI.

[3]  R. Lucht,et al.  Comparison of rigid and elastic matching of dynamic magnetic resonance mammographic images by mutual information. , 2000, Medical physics.

[4]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Volume and Shape Preservation of Enhancing Lesions when Applying Non-rigid Registration to a Time Series of Contrast Enhancing MR Breast Images , 2000, MICCAI.

[5]  Derek L. G. Hill,et al.  Comparison of biomechanical breast models: a case study , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[6]  Nicholas Ayache,et al.  The Correlation Ratio as a New Similarity Measure for Multimodal Image Registration , 1998, MICCAI.

[7]  Daniel Rueckert,et al.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[8]  Jürgen R. Reichenbach,et al.  Development and validation of an algorithm for registration of serial 3D MR breast data sets , 2007, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[9]  D. Hawkes,et al.  Anisotropic multi-scale fluid registration: evaluation in magnetic resonance breast imaging , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[10]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Validation of Volume-Preserving Non-rigid Registration: Application to Contrast-Enhanced MR-Mammography , 2002, MICCAI.

[11]  Derek L. G. Hill,et al.  Finite-element based validation of nonrigid registration using single- and multilevel free-form deformations: application to contrast-enhanced MR mammography , 2002, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[12]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  A three-component deformation model for image-guided surgery , 1998, Medical Image Anal..

[13]  Sung Yong Shin,et al.  Scattered Data Interpolation with Multilevel B-Splines , 1997, IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph..

[14]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  A nonparametric method for automatic correction of intensity nonuniformity in MRI data , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  A Non-Rigid Registration Algorithm for Dynamic Breast MR Images , 1999, Artif. Intell..

[16]  M A Helvie,et al.  Linear motion correction in three dimensions applied to dynamic gadolinium enhanced breast imaging. , 1999, Medical physics.

[17]  Jürgen Hennig,et al.  Local elastic matching and pattern recognition in MR mammography , 1999, Int. J. Imaging Syst. Technol..

[18]  Michael Brady,et al.  Analysis of dynamic MR breast images using a model of contrast enhancement , 1997, Medical Image Anal..

[19]  R. Warren,et al.  Magnetic resonance imaging screening in women at genetic risk of breast cancer: imaging and analysis protocol for the UK multicentre study , 2000 .

[20]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Validation of Non-rigid Registration Using Finite Element Methods , 2001, IPMI.

[21]  Demetri Terzopoulos,et al.  Analysis and Synthesis of Facial Image Sequences Using Physical and Anatomical Models , 1993, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[22]  J. Schnabel,et al.  Factors influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models. , 2006, Medical physics.

[23]  E. Haber,et al.  Numerical methods for volume preserving image registration , 2004 .

[24]  A. Khotanzad,et al.  A physics-based coordinate transformation for 3-D image matching , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[25]  David J. Hawkes,et al.  Deformations Incorporating Rigid Structures , 1996, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[26]  Aldo von Wangenheim,et al.  Data-driven registration for local deformations , 1996, Pattern Recognit. Lett..

[27]  D M Ikeda,et al.  Lesion Diagnosis Working Group Report , 1999, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[28]  Torsten Rohlfing,et al.  Volume-preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free-form deformation with an incompressibility constraint , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[29]  Colin Studholme,et al.  An overlap invariant entropy measure of 3D medical image alignment , 1999, Pattern Recognit..

[30]  B. Zetter,et al.  Tumor interactions with the vasculature: angiogenesis and tumor metastasis. , 1990, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[31]  D. Rueckert,et al.  Comparison and evaluation of rigid, affine, and nonrigid registration of breast MR images. , 1999, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[32]  John Fitzpatrick.  Detecting Failure, Assessing Success , 2001 .