Field Evaluation of CRISPR-Driven Jointless Pedicel Fresh-Market Tomatoes

Clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)-driven traits are commonly introduced into tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) in less than a year. Although CRISPR technology is highly suitable for rapid incorporation of new traits into plants with superior breeding backgrounds, the usefulness of these traits must be demonstrated prior to large-scale distribution of any new variety possessing them. The jointless pedicel trait is crucial for stem-free harvest of tomato fruits and is therefore an essential requirement for developing low-labor tomato varieties. We aimed to evaluate the effect of CRISPR-driven jointless pedicel trait on the yield and horticultural traits of fresh-market tomatoes. We conducted field trials during three consecutive seasons using three related genotypes of two elite fresh-market tomatoes, namely a jointed pedicel tomato, a CRISPR-driven jointless pedicel mutant of the jointed pedicel tomato, and a conventionally-bred jointless pedicel near isogenic line (NIL) to the jointed pedicel tomato. Field evaluations confirmed that the total and medium-, large-, or extra-large-size fruit yields of the CRISPR-driven mutants were not statistically different for those corresponding to their backgrounds and that the fruit yield stratified by fruit size might be varied under different growth conditions. We did not observe any negative correlation between the genotype and the fruit/abscission joint detachment force for any of the genotypes under study.

[1]  E. van der Knaap,et al.  Identification and characterization of GLOBE, a major gene controlling fruit shape and impacting fruit size and marketability in tomato , 2021, Horticulture research.

[2]  Zachary H. Lemmon,et al.  Duplication of a domestication locus neutralized a cryptic variant that caused a breeding barrier in tomato , 2019, Nature Plants.

[3]  Tong-Geon Lee,et al.  Fine Mapping of the brachytic Locus on the Tomato Genome , 2018, Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science.

[4]  Lukas A. Mueller,et al.  Molecular Markers to Select for the j-2–mediated Jointless Pedicel in Tomato , 2018 .

[5]  J. Gouzy,et al.  High-quality de novo assembly of the apple genome and methylome dynamics of early fruit development , 2017, Nature Genetics.

[6]  Zachary H. Lemmon,et al.  Bypassing Negative Epistasis on Yield in Tomato Imposed by a Domestication Gene , 2017, Cell.

[7]  G. Coupland,et al.  Editorial: Recent Advances in Flowering Time Control , 2017, Front. Plant Sci..

[8]  Lei S. Qi,et al.  CRISPR/Cas9 in Genome Editing and Beyond. , 2016, Annual review of biochemistry.

[9]  C. Harwood Classical Genetics and Traditional Breeding , 2014 .

[10]  John W. Scott Phenotyping of Tomato for SolCAP and Onward into the Void , 2010 .

[11]  G. King,et al.  Genetics and epigenetics of fruit development and ripening. , 2008, Current opinion in plant biology.

[12]  J. Scott Fla. 7946 Tomato Breeding Line Resistant to Fusarium oxysporum f.sp. lycopersici Races 1, 2, and 3 , 2004 .

[13]  J. Doebley,et al.  The evolution of apical dominance in maize , 1997, Nature.

[14]  Jeanine M. Davis,et al.  Spacing and pruning affect growth, yield, and economic returns of staked fresh-market tomatoes , 1993 .

[15]  D. W. Barton,et al.  RULES FOR NOMENCLATURE IN TOMATO GENETICSIncluding a List of Known Genes , 1955 .