Practical notes on local data‐worth analysis

[1]  H Rabitz,et al.  Systems Analysis at the Molecular Scale , 1989, Science.

[2]  Mary C. Hill,et al.  Distributed Evaluation of Local Sensitivity Analysis (DELSA), with application to hydrologic models , 2014 .

[3]  Luis Tenorio,et al.  Statistics of Parameter Estimates: A Concrete Example , 2015, SIAM Rev..

[4]  J. Vrugt,et al.  A formal likelihood function for parameter and predictive inference of hydrologic models with correlated, heteroscedastic, and non‐Gaussian errors , 2010 .

[5]  N Oreskes,et al.  Verification, Validation, and Confirmation of Numerical Models in the Earth Sciences , 1994, Science.

[6]  Christian D Langevin,et al.  Quantifying Data Worth Toward Reducing Predictive Uncertainty , 2010, Ground water.

[7]  John Doherty,et al.  Two statistics for evaluating parameter identifiability and error reduction , 2009 .

[8]  R. Hunt,et al.  Are Models Too Simple? Arguments for Increased Parameterization , 2007, Ground water.

[9]  D. M. Ely,et al.  A method for evaluating the importance of system state observations to model predictions, with application to the Death Valley regional groundwater flow system , 2004 .

[10]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Estimation of Aquifer Parameters Under Transient and Steady State Conditions: 1. Maximum Likelihood Method Incorporating Prior Information , 1986 .

[11]  Steen Christensen,et al.  Bias and uncertainty in regression-calibrated models of groundwater flow in heterogeneous media , 2006 .

[12]  T. N. Narasimhan,et al.  A PRACTICAL METHOD FOR MODELING FLUID AND HEAT FLOW IN FRACTURED POROUS MEDIA , 1985 .

[13]  M. Zoback,et al.  How faulting keeps the crust strong , 2000 .

[14]  Stefan Finsterle,et al.  Making sense of global sensitivity analyses , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[15]  C. Tiedeman,et al.  Methods for using groundwater model predictions to guide hydrogeologic data collection, with application to the Death Valley regional groundwater flow system , 2003 .

[16]  Max D. Morris,et al.  Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments , 1991 .

[17]  Stefan Finsterle,et al.  Advances in subsurface modeling using the TOUGH suite of simulators , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[18]  Saman Razavi,et al.  What do we mean by sensitivity analysis? The need for comprehensive characterization of “global” sensitivity in Earth and Environmental systems models , 2015 .

[19]  S. P. Neuman,et al.  Bayesian analysis of data-worth considering model and parameter uncertainties , 2012 .

[20]  C. Tiedeman,et al.  Effective Groundwater Model Calibration , 2007 .

[21]  Paola Annoni,et al.  Sixth International Conference on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output How to avoid a perfunctory sensitivity analysis , 2010 .

[22]  Stefano Tarantola,et al.  Sensitivity analysis practices: Strategies for model-based inference , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[23]  Stefan Finsterle,et al.  TOUGH: Model use, calibration and validation , 2012 .

[24]  A. Lehikoinen,et al.  Dynamic inversion for hydrological process monitoring with electrical resistance tomography under model uncertainties , 2010 .

[25]  D. Hamby.  A review of techniques for parameter sensitivity analysis of environmental models , 1994, Environmental monitoring and assessment.

[26]  Stefan Finsterle,et al.  A truncated Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm for the calibration of highly parameterized nonlinear models , 2011, Comput. Geosci..

[27]  R. Cook.  Detection of influential observation in linear regression , 2000 .

[28]  Stefan Finsterle,et al.  Error handling strategies in multiphase inverse modeling , 2011, Comput. Geosci..

[29]  Stefan Finsterle,et al.  Determining permeability of tight rock samples using inverse modeling , 1997 .

[30]  D. R. Nielsen,et al.  A consistent set of parametric models for the two‐phase flow of immiscible fluids in the subsurface , 1989 .

[31]  Gudmundur S. Bodvarsson,et al.  Characterization and prediction of subsurface pneumatic response at Yucca Mountain, Nevada , 1999 .