Respiratory Protective Equipment

The respirator is historically one of the oldest types of equipment used for personal protection in the occupational setting. It is uncertain when the use of primitive forms of respiratory protection began. However, Pliny the Elder recorded the first known use of such a device early in the 1st century ad. Although respirators have been used for almost 2000 years, the genesis of their technical development is actually the mid-19th century. During that century. Despite major advances in knowledge and technology, respirator development continued slowly. Chemical warfare agents, introduced in World War I, focused attention on the need for adequate respirators. In the United States, the Bureau of Mines successfully carried out this work for the army. The forerunners of present-day respirators began to appear after World War I. In those early years, misuse of surplus army gas masks by civilians and employers, who had sole discretion about deciding when and how respirators were used, highlighted the need for respiratory protection standards. The Bureau of Mines in 1919 initiated the first respirator certification program in the United States and certified their first respirator, a self-contained breathing apparatus in 1920. Responsibility for the respirator certification program was transferred from the Bureau of Mines to NIOSH in 1972. In 1995, NIOSH promulgated new certification regulations, Title 42 Code of Federal Regulations Part 84 (Part 84). Knowing the minimum performance standards and recognizing the limitations of the NIOSH certification tests are important when selecting and using a “NIOSH-certified” repirator. Achieving proper respiratory protection with NIOSH-certified RPE requires that (1) the RPE be properly selected for the environment in which it will be used; (2) its face fitting characteristics be adequately evaluated and considered in the selection process; and (3) workers receive periodic training that adequately prepares them to conscientiously and properly wear and use the RPE. Three recognized standard-producing groups have produced guidance or standards on establishing and maintaining the elements of a good respiratory protection program. They are: The American National Standards Institute (ANSI), The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH), and The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The primary objective of industrial hygiene is to prevent contaminants from escaping into the atmosphere. Hazard control should start at the outset of process, equipment, and plant design stages so those potential exposure sources can be engineered out. But very often exposure control becomes an issue after the process(es) are operational and therefore control becomes a more difficult and costly proposition. However, even then consideration should be given to the use of effective engineering controls to eliminate and/or reduce exposure to respiratory hazards. The preferred priority of controls steps are (1) substitution of a less toxic substance, (2) encapsulation or isolation of the process, (3) use of local exhaust ventilation or general ventilation in conjunction with filters and scrubbers to control the effluents, (4) use of personal protective equipment (PPE). Respiratory protective equipment should be used only when all higher priority control steps are not technically or financially feasible. Real world circumstances however demonstrate that engineering controls often do not reduce exposures sufficiently to eliminate a respiratory hazard. As a result respiratory protective equipment (RPE) becomes the only technically and economically feasible adjunct to engineering controls to minimize and control respiratory exposures. According to recent estimates reported by the OSHA Office of Regulatory Analysis, roughly 5 million workers, 19–20% of the mining/manufacturing/ construction workforce, in 1.3 million establishments use or have access to some type of respiratory protective equipment. Thus, RPE continues to be an important component in many respiratory exposure control plans. As a result, selection, use and evaluation of RPE have become more important as well. Keywords: Respirators; Definitions; Regulatory update; Performance; Classification; Certification; Hazards; Training; Maintenance

[1]  W R Myers,et al.  Evaluation of new in-facepiece sampling procedures for full and half facepieces. , 1993, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[2]  L M Brosseau Aerosol penetration behavior of respirator valves. , 1998, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[3]  D L Campbell,et al.  Comparison of six respirator fit-test methods with an actual measurement of exposure in a simulated health care environment: Part II--Method comparison testing. , 1998, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[4]  F E Adley,et al.  Protection factors and self-contained compressed-air breathing apparatus. , 1969, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[5]  J T McConville,et al.  Respirator protection factors: Part I -- Development of an anthropometric test panel. , 1978, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[6]  Warren R. Myers,et al.  Field Performance Measurements of Half-Facepiece Respirators—Paint Spraying Operations , 1996 .

[7]  R K Oestenstad,et al.  Distribution of faceseal leak sites on a half-mask respirator and their association with facial dimensions. , 1990, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[8]  M Hery,et al.  Assessment of the performance of respirators in the workplace. , 1991, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[9]  E C HYATT,et al.  CURRENT PROBLEMS AND NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN RESPIRATORY PROTECTION. , 1963, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[10]  A. Bhattacharya,et al.  Determination of critical anthropometric parameters for design of respirators. , 1982, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[11]  S N Tannahill,et al.  Workplace protection factors of HSE approved negative pressure full-facepiece dust respirators during asbestos stripping: preliminary findings. , 1990, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[12]  T Myojo,et al.  Variation in quantitative respirator fit factors due to fluctuations in leak size during fit testing. , 1994, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[13]  S S Que Hee,et al.  Inhalation exposure of lead in brass foundry workers: the evaluation of the effectiveness of a powered air-purifying respirator and engineering controls. , 1983, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[14]  K Willeke,et al.  Characteristics of face seal leakage in filtering facepieces. , 1992, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[15]  W R Myers,et al.  Causes of in-facepiece sampling bias--II. Full-facepiece respirators. , 1988, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[16]  T. Tuomi,et al.  Face seal leakage of half masks and surgical masks. , 1985, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[17]  P L Lowry,et al.  Quantitative fit-test method for powered air-purifying respirators. , 1979, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[18]  C D Crutchfield,et al.  A feasibility study of quantitative respirator fit testing by controlled negative pressure. , 1991, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[19]  F E ADLEY,et al.  Methods for performance testing of respiratory protective equipment. , 1962, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[20]  J. Amoore,et al.  Odor as an ald to chemical safety: Odor thresholds compared with threshold limit values and volatilities for 214 industrial chemicals in air and water dilution , 1983, Journal of applied toxicology : JAT.

[21]  A L Hack,et al.  Respirator protection factors: Part II-protection factors of supplied-air respirators. , 1980, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[22]  K Willeke,et al.  Particle size-dependent leakage and losses of aerosols in respirators. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[23]  William C. Hinds,et al.  Effect of Facial-seal Leaks on Protection Provided by Half-mask Respirators , 1988 .

[24]  K Willeke,et al.  The effect of aerosol size distribution and measurement method on respirator fit. , 1987, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[25]  T J Smith,et al.  Measurement of protection factors of chemical cartridge, half-mask respirators under working conditions in a copper smelter. , 1976, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[26]  Z Zhuang,et al.  Field performance measurements of half-facepiece respirators: developing probability estimates to evaluate the adequacy of an APF of 10. , 1998, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[27]  G S Hewson,et al.  Determination of program protection factors for half-mask respirators used at a mineral sands separation plant. , 1992, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[28]  Parker C. Reist,et al.  RESPIRATOR USAGE IN COAL MINES , 1972, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[29]  Laurence D. Reed,et al.  Workplace Evaluation of a Disposable Respirator in a Dusty Environment , 1987 .

[30]  W P Morgan,et al.  Prediction of distress for individuals wearing industrial respirators. , 1985, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[31]  R K Oestenstad,et al.  An assessment of critical anthropometric dimensions for predicting the fit of a half-mask respirator. , 1992, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[32]  W R Myers,et al.  Parameters that bias the measurement of airborne concentration within a respirator. , 1986, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[33]  W R Myers,et al.  Performance measurements on a powered air-purifying respirator made during actual field use in a silica bagging operation. , 1983, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[34]  D L Campbell,et al.  Assigned protection factors for two respirator types based upon workplace performance testing. , 1984, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[35]  J F Gamble,et al.  A model for correcting Workplace Protection Factors for lung deposition and other effects. , 1993, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[36]  T J Stobbe,et al.  Facial hair and respirator fit: a review of the literature. , 1988, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[37]  W R Myers,et al.  Workplace protection factor measurements on powered air-purifying respirators at a secondary lead smelter: results and discussion. , 1984, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[38]  R K Oestenstad,et al.  Identification of faceseal leak sites on a half-mask respirator. , 1990, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[39]  W R Myers,et al.  Workplace protection factor measurements on powered air-purifying respirators at a secondary lead smelter--test protocol. , 1984, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[40]  H Weill,et al.  The efficiency of protective hoods used by sandblasters to reduce silica dust exposure. , 1975, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[41]  W. H. Revoir,et al.  Respirators for Protection against Cotton Dust , 1974 .

[42]  Z Zhuang,et al.  Field performance measurements of half-facepiece respirators: steel mill operations. , 1998, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[43]  W. Burgess,et al.  A new technique for evaluating respirator performance. , 1961, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[44]  W C Hinds,et al.  The effect of respirator dead space and lung retention on exposure estimates. , 1993, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[45]  R C Spear,et al.  A probability model for assessing exposure among respirator wearers: Part II-Overexposure to chronic versus acute toxicants. , 1992, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[46]  R J Beal,et al.  The measurement of leakage of respirators. , 1966, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[47]  U I Balldin,et al.  Physiological effects of pressure demand masks during heavy exercise. , 1984, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[48]  W P Morgan,et al.  Psychological problems associated with the wearing of industrial respirators: a review. , 1983, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[49]  P B Raven,et al.  Physiological response to "pressure-demand" respirator wear. , 1982, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[50]  Z Zhuang,et al.  Field performance measurements of half-facepiece respirators--foundry operations. , 1996, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[51]  G S Fergin Respirator evaluation for carbon setters with beards. , 1984, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[52]  H Weill,et al.  Respirable silica dust exposure of sandblasters and associated workers in steel fabrication yards. , 1974, Archives of environmental health.

[53]  R D Putnam,et al.  Inhalation exposure of cadmium workers: effects of respirator usage. , 1980, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[54]  A. Gaboury,et al.  Workplace Protection Factor Evaluation of Respiratory Protective Equipment in a Primary Aluminum Smelter , 1993 .

[55]  T J Nelson The assigned protection factor of 10 for half-mask respirators. , 1995, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[56]  W A Burgess,et al.  Protection from the daughter products of radon through the use of a powered air-purifying respirator. , 1968, Health physics.

[57]  G. O. Nelson,et al.  Respirator cartridge efficiency studies. V. Effect of solvent vapor. , 1974, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[58]  Grady Lynn Holt Employee facial hair versus employer respirator policies , 1987 .

[59]  R C Spear,et al.  A probability model for assessing exposure among respirator wearers: Part I--Description of the model. , 1992, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[60]  George Wallis,et al.  WORKPLACE FIELD TESTING OF A DISPOSABLE NEGATIVE PRESSURE HALF-MASK DUST RESPIRATOR (3M 8710) , 1993 .

[61]  William Popendorf,et al.  Respirator Protection and Acceptability Among Agricultural Workers , 1995 .

[62]  W P Morgan,et al.  Effects of pressure-demand respirator wear on physiological and perceptual variables during progressive exercise to maximal levels. , 1989, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[63]  R C Spear,et al.  Variability in protection afforded by half-mask respirators against styrene exposure in the field. , 1990, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.