BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to identify the impact of motorcycle helmet use on patient outcomes and cost of hospitalization, in a state with a mandatory helmet law.
METHODS
Patients admitted after motorcycle crashes from July 1996 to October 2000 were reviewed, including demographics, Injury Severity Score, length of stay, injuries, outcome, helmet use, hospital cost data, and insurance information. Statistical analysis was performed comparing helmeted to unhelmeted patients using analysis of variance, Student's test, and regression analysis.
RESULTS
We admitted 216 patients: 174 wore helmets and 42 did not. Injury Severity Score correlated with both length of stay and cost of hospitalization. Mortality was not significantly different in either group. Failure to wear a helmet significantly increased incidence of head injuries (Student's test, p < 0.02), but not other injuries. Helmet use decreased mean cost of hospitalization by more than $6,000 per patient.
CONCLUSION
Failure to wear a helmet adds to the financial burden created by motorcycle-related injuries. Therefore, individuals who do not wear helmets should pay higher insurance premiums.
[1]
G Lapidus,et al.
A population-based study of motorcycle injury and costs.
,
1992,
Annals of emergency medicine.
[2]
N. Mcswain,et al.
Motorcycle helmets--medical costs and the law.
,
1990,
The Journal of trauma.
[3]
W. Max,et al.
Putting a lid on injury costs: the economic impact of the California motorcycle helmet law.
,
1998,
The Journal of trauma.
[4]
P. Salzberg,et al.
Motorcycle helmet use and injury outcome and hospitalization costs from crashes in Washington State.
,
1996,
American journal of public health.