Objective Measurement of Local Rod and Cone Function Using Gaze-Controlled Chromatic Pupil Campimetry in Healthy Subjects

Purpose We introduce a new approach for functional mapping of rod and cone activity by measuring pupillary responses to local stimulation via gaze-controlled chromatic pupil campimetry (CPC). Methods Pupillary constriction amplitude and latency to constriction onset to local photopic and scotopic light stimuli at different locations within the 30° central visual field were analyzed in 14 healthy subjects (4 males, 34 ± 11 years, mean ± standard deviation [SD]). All subjects were measured twice for evaluating the test–retest variability and reproducibility of the method. Results For the cone-favoring protocol (ConeProt), the relative maximal constriction amplitude was most pronounced in the center (26.8% ± 6.3%) with a hill-shaped decrease from the fovea to the periphery. For the rod-favoring protocol (RodProt), it was smaller (center, 13.5% ± 4.5%) with a profile lacking the central peak. Mean latency to constriction onset was faster for cones (277 ± 25 ms) than for rods (372 ± 13 ms). Mean intraclass correlation at the different stimulus locations was 0.84 ± 0.08 for RodProt and 0.75 ± 0.11 for ConeProt; mean coefficients of repeatability value of all stimulus locations was 5.9% ± 1.2% and 8.6% ± 1.7%, respectively. Conclusions CPC provides an objective evaluation of local rod and cone function within the central 30° visual field. It shows a photoreceptor-specific profile in healthy subjects. Due to its easy, noncontact, gaze-controlled character, it is a clinically applicable method and may fill the gap of functional diagnostics of rods and cones of the human retina. Translational Relevance Chromatic pupil campimetry provides information about the local rod and cone function of the human retina with distinct pattern of distributions in an objective manner.

[1]  Andrew J. Zele,et al.  Standards in Pupillography , 2019, Front. Neurol..

[2]  I. Sher,et al.  Effect of Stimulus Intensity and Visual Field Location on Rod- and Cone-Mediated Pupil Response to Focal Light Stimuli. , 2018, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  Torsten Strasser,et al.  Pupillographic campimetry: an objective method to measure the visual field , 2018, Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering.

[4]  S. Dumoulin,et al.  Gaze-Contingent Flicker Pupil Perimetry Detects Scotomas in Patients With Cerebral Visual Impairments or Glaucoma , 2018, Front. Neurol..

[5]  Raymond P. Najjar,et al.  Pupillary Responses to Full-Field Chromatic Stimuli Are Reduced in Patients with Early-Stage Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. , 2018, Ophthalmology.

[6]  A. Gaudric,et al.  Distribution of cone density, spacing and arrangement in adult healthy retinas with adaptive optics flood illumination , 2018, PloS one.

[7]  D. Birch,et al.  Dark-Adapted Chromatic Perimetry for Measuring Rod Visual Fields in Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa , 2017, Translational vision science & technology.

[8]  B. Wilhelm,et al.  Analysis of retinal function using chromatic pupillography in retinitis pigmentosa and the relationship to electrically evoked phosphene thresholds , 2017, Acta ophthalmologica.

[9]  Jennifer I. Lim,et al.  Pupillary responses in non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[10]  B. Wilhelm,et al.  Development of a Chromatic Pupillography Protocol for the First Gene Therapy Trial in Patients With CNGA3-Linked Achromatopsia. , 2017, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[11]  Andrew J. Zele,et al.  Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cell Function, Sleep Efficiency and Depression in Advanced Age-Related Macular Degeneration. , 2017, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[12]  Mohamad O Mhajna,et al.  Chromatic Multifocal Pupillometer for Objective Perimetry and Diagnosis of Patients with Retinitis Pigmentosa. , 2016, Ophthalmology.

[13]  Andrew J. Zele,et al.  Quadrant Field Pupillometry Detects Melanopsin Dysfunction in Glaucoma Suspects and Early Glaucoma , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[14]  Andrew J. Zele,et al.  Melanopsin-mediated post-illumination pupil response in the peripheral retina. , 2016, Journal of vision.

[15]  Terry K Koo,et al.  A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. , 2016, Journal of chiropractic medicine.

[16]  Torsten Strasser,et al.  Pupillary responses driven by ipRGCs and classical photoreceptors are impaired in glaucoma , 2016, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[17]  Andrew J. Zele,et al.  Melanopsin-Mediated Post-Illumination Pupil Response in Early Age-Related Macular Degeneration. , 2015, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[18]  H. Lüdtke,et al.  Investigation of summation mechanisms in the pupillomotor system , 2014, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[19]  Andrew J. Zele,et al.  Melanopsin-Expressing Intrinsically Photosensitive Retinal Ganglion Cells in Retinal Disease , 2014, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[20]  W. M. Wood-Vasey,et al.  The post illumination pupil response is reduced in seasonal affective disorder , 2013, Psychiatry Research.

[21]  A. James,et al.  Photopic and scotopic multifocal pupillographic responses in age-related macular degeneration , 2012, Vision Research.

[22]  Andrew J. Zele,et al.  The post‐illumination pupil response of melanopsin‐expressing intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in diabetes , 2012, Acta ophthalmologica.

[23]  Andrew J. Zele,et al.  Intrinsically photosensitive (melanopsin) retinal ganglion cell function in glaucoma. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[24]  Paul D. Gamlin,et al.  The post-illumination pupil response is reduced in glaucoma patients. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  Aki Kawasaki,et al.  Chromatic pupillometry in patients with retinitis pigmentosa. , 2011, Ophthalmology.

[26]  A. James,et al.  Multifocal pupillographic visual field testing in glaucoma , 2009, Clinical & experimental ophthalmology.

[27]  H. Lüdtke,et al.  How sensitive is pupil campimetry in hemifield loss? , 2009, Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology.

[28]  T. Berendschot,et al.  Foveal cone-photoreceptor integrity in aging macula disorder. , 2008, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[29]  H. Wilhelm,et al.  Pupil campimetry in patients with visual field loss , 2005, European journal of neurology.

[30]  Donald C Hood,et al.  The Multifocal Electroretinogram , 2003, Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.

[31]  M. Benatar,et al.  Field of Vision , 2003, Current Clinical Neurology.

[32]  S. Jacobson,et al.  Total colourblindness is caused by mutations in the gene encoding the α-subunit of the cone photoreceptor cGMP-gated cation channel , 1998, Nature Genetics.

[33]  A. Hendrickson,et al.  Human photoreceptor topography , 1990, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[34]  D. Altman,et al.  STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT , 1986, The Lancet.

[35]  J. Lebensohn Physiology of the Eye , 1954 .

[36]  Gary G. Koch,et al.  Intraclass Correlation Coefficient , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[37]  A. Janecke,et al.  Mutations in PDE6A, the Gene Encoding the α-Subunit of Rod Photoreceptor Cgmp-Specific Phosphodiesterase, are Rare in Autosomal Recessive Retinitis Pigmentosa , 1997 .