The search queries that took Australian Internet users to Wikipedia

Introduction. This exploratory study analyses the content of the search queries that led Australian Internet users from a search engine to a Wikipedia entry. Method. The study used transaction logs from Hitwise that matched search queries with data on the lifestyle of the searcher. A total sample of 1760 search terms, stratified by search term frequency and lifestyle, was drawn. Analysis. Each search term was coded to indicate the subject of the query and weighted according to its position in the long tail distribution. Quantitative analysis was carried out using the statistical package SPSS. Results. The results of the study suggest that Wikipedia is used more for lighter topics than for those of a more academic or serious nature. Significant differences among the various lifestyle segments were observed in the use of Wikipedia for queries on popular culture, cultural practice and science. Conclusions. The analysis provides some analytical purchase on the complex nature of information search and the difficulties inherent in assuming a valid distinction between information search and entertainment. It is suggested that the term leisure search be used to identify information search that is in itself a leisure activity and not a search for particular information.

[1]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. , 1993 .

[2]  B. Shoshan High Culture and Popular Culture in Medieval Islam , 1991 .

[3]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Searching the Web: the public and their queries , 2001 .

[4]  Andrei Broder,et al.  A taxonomy of web search , 2002, SIGF.

[5]  Daniel E. Rose,et al.  Understanding user goals in web search , 2004, WWW '04.

[6]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Web Search: Public Searching of the Web , 2011, Information Science and Knowledge Management.

[7]  Sonya Lipczynska Power to the people: the case for Wikipedia , 2005 .

[8]  J. Giles Internet encyclopaedias go head to head , 2005, Nature.

[9]  J. Giles Wikipedia rival calls in the experts , 2006, Nature.

[10]  Thomas Chesney,et al.  An empirical examination of Wikipedia's credibility , 2006, First Monday.

[11]  Paul Duguid,et al.  Limits of self-organization: Peer production and "laws of quality" , 2006, First Monday.

[12]  Bernard J. Jansen,et al.  Search log analysis: What it is, what's been done, how to do it , 2006 .

[13]  Amanda Spink,et al.  How are we searching the World Wide Web? A comparison of nine search engine transaction logs , 2006, Inf. Process. Manag..

[14]  Cindy Royal,et al.  What's on Wikipedia, and What's Not . . . ? , 2007 .

[15]  Andrew Keen,et al.  Book Review: Andrew Keen, The Cult of the Amateur: How Today's Internet Is Killing Our Culture and Assaulting Our Economy. London and Boston, MA: Currency/Doubleday, 2007. 228 pp. ISBN 0—3855—2080—8, $22.95 (pbk) , 2008, New Media Soc..

[16]  Katy Börner,et al.  Analyzing and visualizing the semantic coverage of Wikipedia and its authors: Research Articles , 2007 .

[17]  Gary E. Gorman A tale of information ethics and encyclopædias; or, is Wikipedia just another internet scam? , 2007, Online Inf. Rev..

[18]  Annamaria Galluzzi Perceptions of libraries and information resources: a report to the OCLC membership , 2007 .

[19]  Ann M. Lally,et al.  Using Wikipedia to Extend Digital Collections , 2007, D Lib Mag..

[20]  Anselm Spoerri,et al.  What is popular on Wikipedia and why? , 2007, First Monday.

[21]  W. Dutton,et al.  Oxford Internet Survey 2007 Report: The Internet in Britain , 2007 .

[22]  Derek Lackaff,et al.  An Analysis of Topical Coverage of Wikipedia , 2008, J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..

[23]  A. Wells A Portrait of Early Internet Adopters: Why People First Went Online -- and Why They Stayed , 2008 .

[24]  Jamshid Beheshti,et al.  Collaboration in Context: Comparing Article Evolution among Subject Disciplines in Wikipedia , 2008, First Monday.

[25]  S. Ewing,et al.  CCi Digital Futures report: the Internet in Australia , 2008 .

[26]  Diomidis Spinellis,et al.  The collaborative organization of knowledge , 2008, CACM.

[27]  R. Armstrong The Long Tail: Why the Future of Business Is Selling Less of More , 2008 .

[28]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Toward a Web Search Information Behavior Model , 2008 .

[29]  William B. Badke What to Do With Wikipedia , 2008 .

[30]  Amanda Spink,et al.  Determining the informational, navigational, and transactional intent of Web queries , 2008, Inf. Process. Manag..

[31]  Lauren Pressley,et al.  Putting the Library in Wikipedia , 2008 .

[32]  Beate Elvebakk Philosophy Democratized? , 2008, First Monday.

[33]  Soyeon Park,et al.  Analysis of characteristics and trends of Web queries submitted to NAVER, a major Korean search engine , 2009 .

[34]  Vivienne Waller,et al.  What do the Public Search for on the Catalogue of the State Library of Victoria , 2009 .

[35]  Martin Whittle,et al.  Web searching by the "general public": an individual differences perspective , 2009, J. Documentation.

[36]  Sook Lim,et al.  How and why do college students use Wikipedia? , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[37]  Mark Sanderson,et al.  Are Web-based informational queries changing? , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[38]  Ryan McGrady Gaming Against the Greater Good , 2009, First Monday.

[39]  Nicholas Berente,et al.  Wikipedia, Critical Social Theory, and the Possibility of Rational Discourse 1 , 2009, Inf. Soc..

[40]  Alison J. Head,et al.  How Today's College Students use Wikipedia for Course-related Research , 2010, First Monday.

[41]  Elad Segev,et al.  Popular Searches in Google and Yahoo!: A “Digital Divide” in Information Uses? , 2010, Inf. Soc..