Effects of Adhesion Dynamics and Substrate Compliance on the Shape and Motility of Crawling Cells

Computational modeling of eukaryotic cells moving on substrates is an extraordinarily complex task: many physical processes, such as actin polymerization, action of motors, formation of adhesive contacts concomitant with both substrate deformation and recruitment of actin etc., as well as regulatory pathways are intertwined. Moreover, highly nontrivial cell responses emerge when the substrate becomes deformable and/or heterogeneous. Here we extended a computational model for motile cell fragments, based on an earlier developed phase field approach, to account for explicit dynamics of adhesion site formation, as well as for substrate compliance via an effective elastic spring. Our model displays steady motion vs. stick-slip transitions with concomitant shape oscillations as a function of the actin protrusion rate, the substrate stiffness, and the rates of adhesion. Implementing a step in the substrate’s elastic modulus, as well as periodic patterned surfaces exemplified by alternating stripes of high and low adhesiveness, we were able to reproduce the correct motility modes and shape phenomenology found experimentally. We also predict the following nontrivial behavior: the direction of motion of cells can switch from parallel to perpendicular to the stripes as a function of both the adhesion strength and the width ratio of adhesive to non-adhesive stripes.

[1]  M. Abercrombie,et al.  The Croonian Lecture, 1978 - The crawling movement of metazoan cells , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[2]  Wolfgang Alt,et al.  Continuum model of cell adhesion and migration , 2009, Journal of mathematical biology.

[3]  Sanjay Kumar,et al.  The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. , 2009, Cancer research.

[4]  Alex J. Loosley,et al.  Stick-slip motion and elastic coupling in crawling cells. , 2012, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[5]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Coupling actin flow, adhesion, and morphology in a computational cell motility model , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  David J Odde,et al.  Traction Dynamics of Filopodia on Compliant Substrates , 2008, Science.

[7]  Tom Shemesh,et al.  Physical model for self-organization of actin cytoskeleton and adhesion complexes at the cell front. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[8]  Julie A. Theriot,et al.  An Adhesion-Dependent Switch between Mechanisms That Determine Motile Cell Shape , 2011, PLoS biology.

[9]  Manuel Théry,et al.  Anisotropy of cell adhesive microenvironment governs cell internal organization and orientation of polarity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[10]  Lev S. Tsimring,et al.  Effects of cross-links on motor-mediated filament organization , 2007, 0705.1559.

[11]  C. Wolgemuth,et al.  Lamellipodial contractions during crawling and spreading. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[12]  G. Danuser,et al.  Locomotion of fish epidermal keratocytes on spatially selective adhesion patterns. , 2007, Cell motility and the cytoskeleton.

[13]  Erich Sackmann,et al.  Cell adhesion as wetting transition? , 2002, Chemphyschem : a European journal of chemical physics and physical chemistry.

[14]  N. Balaban,et al.  Adhesion-dependent cell mechanosensitivity. , 2003, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[15]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Modeling cytoskeletal flow over adhesion sites: competition between stochastic bond dynamics and intracellular relaxation , 2010, Journal of physics. Condensed matter : an Institute of Physics journal.

[16]  Claudio G. Rolli,et al.  Switchable adhesive substrates: revealing geometry dependence in collective cell behavior. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[17]  R. Bruinsma,et al.  Self-assembly of membrane junctions. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Wouter-Jan Rappel,et al.  Computational model for cell morphodynamics. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[19]  L. Taber,et al.  Damped and persistent oscillations in a simple model of cell crawling , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[20]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Periodic Lamellipodial Contractions Correlate with Rearward Actin Waves , 2004, Cell.

[21]  T. Pollard.  The cytoskeleton, cellular motility and the reductionist agenda , 2003, Nature.

[22]  M. Sheetz,et al.  Cell migration: regulation of force on extracellular-matrix-integrin complexes. , 1998, Trends in cell biology.

[23]  R Inman,et al.  Lateral diffusion of proteins in membranes. , 1987, Annual review of physiology.

[24]  K. Kruse,et al.  Cell motility resulting from spontaneous polymerization waves. , 2011, Physical review letters.

[25]  M. Gardel,et al.  Transient Frictional Slip between Integrin and the ECM in Focal Adhesions under Myosin II Tension , 2010, Current Biology.

[26]  K. Burridge,et al.  Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. , 1996, Annual review of cell and developmental biology.

[27]  J. Joanny,et al.  Contractility and retrograde flow in lamellipodium motion , 2006, Physical biology.

[28]  J. Joanny,et al.  Generic theory of active polar gels: a paradigm for cytoskeletal dynamics , 2004, The European physical journal. E, Soft matter.

[29]  M. Dembo,et al.  Stresses at the cell-to-substrate interface during locomotion of fibroblasts. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[30]  Frank Jülicher,et al.  Bipedal locomotion in crawling cells. , 2010, Biophysical journal.

[31]  B. Ladoux,et al.  Physically based principles of cell adhesion mechanosensitivity in tissues , 2012, Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society.

[32]  T. Pollard,et al.  Cellular Motility Driven by Assembly and Disassembly of Actin Filaments , 2003, Cell.

[33]  Mikhailov,et al.  Bifurcation to traveling spots in reaction-diffusion systems. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[34]  Deutsche Physikalische.  Mechanisms of cell propulsion by active stresses , 2011 .

[35]  G. Danuser,et al.  Morphodynamic profiling of protrusion phenotypes. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[36]  K. Doubrovinski,et al.  Self-organized cell motility from motor-filament interactions. , 2012, Biophysical journal.

[37]  Stick-slip friction and nucleation dynamics of ultrathin liquid films , 2001, cond-mat/0101186.

[38]  Falko Ziebert,et al.  Model for self-polarization and motility of keratocyte fragments , 2012, Journal of The Royal Society Interface.

[39]  Léa Trichet,et al.  Evidence of a large-scale mechanosensing mechanism for cellular adaptation to substrate stiffness , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[40]  Jean-Jacques Meister,et al.  Force transmission in migrating cells , 2010, The Journal of cell biology.

[41]  M. Dembo,et al.  Cell movement is guided by the rigidity of the substrate. , 2000, Biophysical journal.

[42]  U. Schwarz,et al.  Stochastic dynamics of adhesion clusters under shared constant force and with rebinding. , 2004, The Journal of chemical physics.

[43]  Kinneret Keren,et al.  The Shape of Motile Cells , 2009, Current Biology.

[44]  Ulrich S Schwarz,et al.  United we stand – integrating the actin cytoskeleton and cell–matrix adhesions in cellular mechanotransduction , 2012, Journal of Cell Science.

[45]  Sean P. Palecek,et al.  Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell-substratum adhesiveness , 1997, Nature.

[46]  Gary G. Borisy,et al.  Self-polarization and directional motility of cytoplasm , 1999, Current Biology.