Hemocompatibility of Silicon-Based Substrates for Biomedical Implant Applications

Silicon membranes with highly uniform nanopore sizes fabricated using microelectromechanical systems (MEMS) technology allow for the development of miniaturized implants such as those needed for renal replacement therapies. However, the blood compatibility of silicon has thus far been an unresolved issue in the use of these substrates in implantable biomedical devices. We report the results of hemocompatibility studies using bare silicon, polysilicon, and modified silicon substrates. The surface modifications tested have been shown to reduce protein and/or platelet adhesion, thus potentially improving biocompatibility of silicon. Hemocompatibility was evaluated under four categories—coagulation (thrombin–antithrombin complex, TAT generation), complement activation (complement protein, C3a production), platelet activation (P-selectin, CD62P expression), and platelet adhesion. Our tests revealed that all silicon substrates display low coagulation and complement activation, comparable to that of Teflon and stainless steel, two materials commonly used in medical implants, and significantly lower than that of diethylaminoethyl (DEAE) cellulose, a polymer used in dialysis membranes. Unmodified silicon and polysilicon showed significant platelet attachment; however, the surface modifications on silicon reduced platelet adhesion and activation to levels comparable to that on Teflon. These results suggest that surface-modified silicon substrates are viable for the development of miniaturized renal replacement systems.

[1]  Akon Higuchi,et al.  A highly stable nonbiofouling surface with well-packed grafted zwitterionic polysulfobetaine for plasma protein repulsion. , 2008, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[2]  C. Werner,et al.  Design and evaluation of novel blood incubation systems for in vitro hemocompatibility assessment of planar solid surfaces. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[3]  D. Mooradian,et al.  Hemocompatibility of materials used in microelectromechanical systems: platelet adhesion and morphology in vitro. , 2002, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[4]  S. Hayakawa,et al.  Blood Compatibility of Stainless-Steel and Titanium Immobilized with Alginic Acid Layers , 2002 .

[5]  G. Schultze,et al.  Formation of Thrombin-Antithrombin III Complex Using Polyamide and Hemophan Dialyzers , 1992, The International journal of artificial organs.

[6]  V. Rumjantseva,et al.  Novel and unexpected clearance mechanisms for cold platelets. , 2010, Transfusion and apheresis science : official journal of the World Apheresis Association : official journal of the European Society for Haemapheresis.

[7]  Shuvo Roy,et al.  Anti-biofouling Sulfobetaine Polymer Thin Films on Silicon and Silicon Nanopore Membranes , 2011, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[8]  Shuvo Roy,et al.  Development of continuous implantable renal replacement: past and future. , 2007, Translational research : the journal of laboratory and clinical medicine.

[9]  C. Werner,et al.  In vitro blood compatibility of polymeric biomaterials through covalent immobilization of an amidine derivative. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[10]  Shuvo Roy,et al.  Silicon Induces Minimal Thromboinflammatory Response During 28-Day Intravascular Implant Testing , 2010, ASAIO journal.

[11]  Tejal A Desai,et al.  Poly(ethylene glycol) interfaces: an approach for enhanced performance of microfluidic systems. , 2004, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[12]  M. Hamilton,et al.  Stainless steel stents and magnetic resonance imaging looking into a black hole. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[13]  Shuvo Roy,et al.  High-Performance Silicon Nanopore Hemofiltration Membranes. , 2009, Journal of membrane science.

[14]  M. Ferrari,et al.  Characterization of micromachined silicon membranes for immunoisolation and bioseparation applications , 1999 .

[15]  Tejal A Desai,et al.  Evaluation of the stability of nonfouling ultrathin poly(ethylene glycol) films for silicon-based microdevices. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[16]  R. Marchant,et al.  Glycocalyx-mimetic dextran-modified poly(vinyl amine) surfactant coating reduces platelet adhesion on medical-grade polycarbonate surface. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[17]  M. Maitz,et al.  Blood coagulation on biomaterials requires the combination of distinct activation processes. , 2009, Biomaterials.

[18]  Jaan Hong,et al.  Time sequence of blood activation by nanoporous alumina: Studies on platelets and complement system , 2010, Microscopy research and technique.

[19]  B. Nilsson,et al.  A new in vitro model to study interaction between whole blood and biomaterials. Studies of platelet and coagulation activation and the effect of aspirin. , 1999, Biomaterials.

[20]  J. Hartwig,et al.  Platelet Storage Temperature – How Low Can We Go? , 2007, Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy.

[21]  Alexander Papra,et al.  Characterization of ultrathin poly(ethylene glycol) monolayers on silicon substrates , 2001 .

[22]  Hyun Jong Lee,et al.  Ultrasonographic Monitoring of Implant Thickness after Augmentation Rhinoplasty with Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene , 2009, American journal of rhinology & allergy.

[23]  M. Macey,et al.  Evaluation of the anticoagulants EDTA and citrate, theophylline, adenosine, and dipyridamole (CTAD) for assessing platelet activation on the ADVIA 120 hematology system. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[24]  K. Tan,et al.  Modification of Si(100) surface by the grafting of poly(ethylene glycol) for reduction in protein adsorption and platelet adhesion. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[25]  Shuvo Roy,et al.  An in vivo Biocompatibility Assessment of MEMS Materials for Spinal Fusion Monitoring , 2003 .

[26]  P. Nilsson,et al.  The creation of an antithrombotic surface by apyrase immobilization. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[27]  J. Vienken,et al.  Score model for the evaluation of dialysis membrane hemocompatibility. , 2008, Artificial organs.

[28]  Douglas C. Noll,et al.  Magnetic resonance compatibility of multichannel silicon microelectrode systems for neural recording and stimulation: design criteria, tests, and recommendations , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[29]  Tejal A Desai,et al.  Evaluation of silicon nanoporous membranes and ECM-based microenvironments on neurosecretory cells. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[30]  L. Jennings,et al.  Effect of Ca2+ on GP IIb-IIIa interactions with integrilin: enhanced GP IIb-IIIa binding and inhibition of platelet aggregation by reductions in the concentration of ionized calcium in plasma anticoagulated with citrate. , 1997, Circulation.

[31]  V. Videm,et al.  A novel enzyme immunoassay for plasma thrombospondin. Comparison with beta-thromboglobulin as platelet activation marker in vitro and in vivo. , 2000, Thrombosis research.

[32]  Charles H Tator,et al.  Fast-gelling injectable blend of hyaluronan and methylcellulose for intrathecal, localized delivery to the injured spinal cord. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[33]  J. Hirsh,et al.  Heparin: mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, dosing considerations, monitoring, efficacy, and safety. , 1992, Chest.