Application of chronopotentiometry to determine the thickness of diffusion layer adjacent to an ion-exchange membrane under natural convection.

A brief review of the evolution of the diffusion boundary layer (DBL) conception inspired by the works of Nernst, Levich and Amatore is presented. Experimental methods for studying the DBL in electrode and membrane systems are considered. The electrochemical behaviour of a CM2 cation-exchange membrane in NaCl and KCl solutions is studied by chronopotentiometry at constant under-limiting current. Chronopotentiometric curves are described theoretically by applying the Kedem-Katchalsky equations in differential form to a three-layer system including the membrane and two adjoining DBLs. The conductance coefficients entering the equations are found by treating the results of membrane characterisation: the electrical conductivity, transport numbers of ions and water, electrolyte uptake, as functions of the equilibrium electrolyte solution. The two-phase microheterogeneous model is used for this treatment resulting in presentation of the conductance coefficients as functions of (virtual) electrolyte solution concentration in the membrane. The steady-state DBL thickness (delta) is found by fitting experimental potential drop at sufficiently high times. It is found that delta is proportional to (Delta c)(-0.2), where Delta c is the difference between the electrolyte concentration in the solution bulk and at the interface. This result differs from the Levich equation, which gives the power equal to -0.25 for Delta c. This deviation is explained by the fact that the theory of Levich does not take into account microscopic chaotic convection motion recently described by Amatore et al. It is shown that the treatment of experimental chronopotentiometric curves with the model developed allows one to observe the role of streaming potential in the membrane. Different mechanisms of streaming potential and their effect on the shape of chronopotentiograms are discussed. A simple analytical solution of Navier-Stokes equations applied to natural convection near an infinite vertical ion-exchange membrane is found. It is shown that the formation of DBL induced by electric current is quasi-stationary. This fact allows the empirical expression found earlier and linking delta with Delta c under steady-state conditions to be used in transient regimes. The numerical solution of the non-stationary Kedem-Katchalsky equations together with this empirical expression results in quantitative description of the potential difference (pd) and delta as functions of time in chronopotentiometric experiments. The comparison of theoretical and experimental chronopotentiometric curves shows an excellent agreement, especially for the part after switching off the current. The reasons of a small deviation observed just before the curves attain steady state under a constant current applied are discussed.

[1]  J. Garrido,et al.  Generalization of a finite-difference numerical method for the steady-state and transient solutions of the nernst—planck flux equations , 1985 .

[2]  Yoshinobu Tanaka,et al.  Concentration polarization in ion-exchange membrane electrodialysis—the events arising in a flowing solution in a desalting cell , 2003 .

[3]  J. Manzanares,et al.  Modeling of surface vs. bulk ionic conductivity in fixed charge membranes , 2003 .

[4]  K. Dworecki,et al.  Temporal and spatial structure of the concentration boundary layers in a membrane system , 2003 .

[5]  N. Ibl,et al.  Natural convection mass transfer at vertical electrodes under turbulent flow conditions , 1960 .

[6]  Jae-Hwan Choi,et al.  Direct measurement of concentration distribution within the boundary layer of an ion-exchange membrane. , 2002, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[7]  O. Kedem,et al.  Role of the membrane surface in concentration polarization at ion-exchange membrane , 1988 .

[8]  G. Pourcelly,et al.  Chronopotentiometric response of an ion-exchange membrane in the underlimiting current-range. Transport phenomena within the diffusion layers , 1997 .

[9]  A. Katchalsky,et al.  Permeability of composite membranes. Part 1.—Electric current, volume flow and flow of solute through membranes , 1963 .

[10]  S. Szunerits,et al.  Mapping concentration profiles within the diffusion layer of an electrode , 2000 .

[11]  W. Graydon,et al.  Ion-Exchange Membranes. III. Water Transfer , 1957 .

[12]  Donald G. Miller Application of Irreversible Thermodynamics to Electrolyte Solutions. I. Determination of Ionic Transport Coefficients lij for Isothermal Vector Transport Processes in Binary Electrolyte Systems1,2 , 1966 .

[13]  E. I. Belova,et al.  Effect of anion-exchange membrane surface properties on mechanisms of overlimiting mass transfer. , 2006, The journal of physical chemistry. B.

[14]  Victor Nikonenko,et al.  Effect of structural membrane inhomogeneity on transport properties , 1993 .

[15]  F. Bonhomme,et al.  Mapping concentration profiles within the diffusion layer of an electrode: Part I. Confocal resonance Raman microscopy , 2000 .

[16]  Natalia Pismenskaya,et al.  On the role of gravitational convection in the transfer enhancement of salt ions in the course of dilute solution electrodialysis , 1996 .

[17]  Zaltzman,et al.  Electro-osmotically induced convection at a permselective membrane , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[18]  N. Kononenko,et al.  Physicochemical principles of testing ion-exchange membranes , 1996 .

[19]  S. Adhikary,et al.  Studies of the effect of variation of blend ratio on permselectivity and heterogeneity of ion-exchange membranes. , 2003, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[20]  Victor Nikonenko,et al.  Correlation between transport parameters of ion-exchange membranes , 2002 .

[21]  Victor Nikonenko,et al.  Approximate evaluation of water transport number in ion-exchange membranes , 2004 .

[22]  D. Lerche Quantitative characterisation of current-induced diffusion layers at cation-exchange membranes. II. Determinination of diffusion-layer thickness and concentration polarisation in dependence on current density , 1975 .

[23]  B. Zaltzman,et al.  Experimental Verification of the Electroosmotic Mechanism of Overlimiting Conductance Through a Cation Exchange Electrodialysis Membrane , 2002 .

[24]  N. Mishchuk,et al.  Electroosmosis of the second kind , 1995 .

[25]  Victor Nikonenko,et al.  A simplified procedure for ion-exchange membrane characterisation , 2004 .

[26]  S. Szunerits,et al.  The real meaning of Nernst's steady diffusion layer concept under non-forced hydrodynamic conditions. A simple model based on Levich's seminal view of convection , 2001 .

[27]  S. Dukhin,et al.  Intensification of electrodialysis based on electroosmosis of the second kind , 1993 .

[28]  N. Lakshminarayanaiah,et al.  Ion and water transference across “untreated” collodion membranes , 1966 .

[29]  S. Dukhin,et al.  Electrokinetic phenomena of the second kind and their applications , 1991 .

[30]  V. Vasil'eva,et al.  Concentration fields of solutions under electrodialysis with ion-exchange membranes , 1995 .

[31]  J. Selman,et al.  Measurement of concentration boundary layer thickness development during lithium electrodeposition onto a lithium metal cathode in propylene carbonate , 2003 .

[32]  D. Lerche,et al.  Quantitative Characterisation of current-induced diffusion layers at cation-exchange membranes. I. investigations of temporal and local behaviour of concentration profile at constant current density , 1975 .