A Novel Private Attitude and Public Opinion Dynamics Model for Simulating Pluralistic Ignorance and Minority Influence

Pluralistic ignorance, a well-documented socio-psychological conformity phenomenon, involves discrepancies between private attitude and public opinion in certain social contexts. However, continuous opinion dynamics models based on a bounded confidence assumption fail to accurately model pluralistic ignorance because they do not address scenarios in which non-conformists do not need to worry about holding and expressing conflicting opinions. Such scenarios reduce the power of continuous opinion dynamics models to explain why certain groups doubt or change their opinions in response to minority views. To simulate the effects of (a) private acceptance of informational social influence and (b) public compliance with normative social influence on pluralistic ignorance and minority influences, we have created an agent-based simulation model in which attitude and opinion respectively represent an agent's private and expressed thoughts. Results from a series of simulation experiments indicate model validity equal to or exceeding those of existing opinion dynamics models that are also based on the bounded confidence assumption, but with different dynamics and outcomes in terms of collective opinion and attitude. The results also support the use of our proposed model for computational social psychology applications.

[1]  Muzafer Sherif,et al.  A study of some social factors in perception. , 1935 .

[2]  L. Festinger.  A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance , 1957 .

[3]  Yu Chen,et al.  The Dynamics of Public Opinion in Complex Networks , 2008, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[4]  Rainer Hegselmann,et al.  Opinion dynamics and bounded confidence: models, analysis and simulation , 2002, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[5]  J. Knote.  Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community , 2004 .

[6]  I. Janis.  Groupthink: Psychological Studies of Policy Decisions and Fiascoes , 1982 .

[7]  Hubert J. O'Gorman.  The discovery of pluralistic ignorance: An ironic lesson , 1986 .

[8]  Charles D. Barrett.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[9]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity. , 1987 .

[10]  Duane T. Wegener,et al.  Attitudes and attitude change. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.

[11]  Noah J. Goldstein,et al.  Social influence: compliance and conformity. , 2004, Annual review of psychology.

[12]  M. Nakamaru,et al.  How inconsistency between attitude and behavior persists through cultural transmission. , 2011, Journal of theoretical biology.

[13]  D. Byrne,et al.  Social Psychology: Understanding Human Interaction , 1981 .

[14]  Jan Lorenz,et al.  Continuous Opinion Dynamics under Bounded Confidence: A Survey , 2007, 0707.1762.

[15]  J. A. Hartigan,et al.  A k-means clustering algorithm , 1979 .

[16]  Serge Moscovici,et al.  Toward A Theory of Conversion Behavior , 1980 .

[17]  Laurent Salzarulo,et al.  A Continuous Opinion Dynamics Model Based on the Principle of Meta-Contrast , 2006, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[18]  Diemo Urbig,et al.  Opinion Dynamics: the Effect of the Number of Peers Met at Once , 2008, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[19]  V. L. Allen.  Situational Factors In Conformity1 , 1965 .

[20]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  When social comparison goes awry: The case of pluralistic ignorance. , 1991 .

[21]  Hubert J. O'Gorman.  PLURALISTIC IGNORANCE AND WHITE ESTIMATES OF WHITE SUPPORT FOR RACIAL SEGREGATION , 1975 .

[22]  Diemo Urbig,et al.  Attitude Dynamics With Limited Verbalisation Capabilities , 2003, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..

[23]  M. Sherif.  The Psychology of Social Norms , 1937 .

[24]  M. Deutsch,et al.  A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgement. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[25]  Guillaume Deffuant,et al.  Mixing beliefs among interacting agents , 2000, Adv. Complex Syst..

[26]  Deborah A. Prentice,et al.  Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus: some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. , 1993, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  D. Myers.  Social psychology, 6th ed. , 1999 .

[28]  S. Asch.  Studies of independence and conformity: I. A minority of one against a unanimous majority. , 1956 .

[29]  S. Asch.  Opinions and Social Pressure , 1955, Nature.

[30]  Christian Schulze,et al.  Discretized Opinion Dynamics of the Deffuant Model on Scale-Free Networks , 2004, J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul..