Identification of new bacterial type III secreted effectors with a recursive Hidden Markov Model profile-alignment strategy

To identify new bacterial type III secreted effectors is computationally a big challenge. At least a dozen machine learning algorithms have been developed, but so far have only achieved limited success. Sequence similarity appears important for biologists but is frequently neglected by algorithm developers for effector prediction, although large success was achieved in the field with this strategy a decade ago. In this study, we propose a recursive sequence alignment strategy with Hidden Markov Models, to comprehensively find homologs of known YopJ/P full-length proteins, effector domains and N-terminal signal sequences. Using this method, we identified 155 different YopJ/P-family effectors and 59 proteins with YopJ/P N-terminal signal sequences from 27 genera and more than 70 species. Among these genera, we also identified one type III secretion system (T3SS) from Uliginosibacterium and two T3SSs from Rhizobacter for the first time. Higher conservation of effector domains, N-terminal fusion of signal sequences to other effectors, and the exchange of N-terminal signal sequences between different effector proteins were frequently observed for YopJ/P-family proteins. This made it feasible to identify new effectors based on separate similarity screening for the N-terminal signal peptides and the effector domains of known effectors. This method can also be applied to search for homologues of other known T3SS effectors.

[1]  Ram Samudrala,et al.  Accurate Prediction of Secreted Substrates and Identification of a Conserved Putative Secretion Signal for Type III Secretion Systems , 2009, PLoS pathogens.

[2]  Alice C. McHardy,et al.  Functional overlap of the Arabidopsis leaf and root microbiota , 2015, Nature.

[3]  Tomoko Kubori,et al.  Molecular and functional analysis of the type III secretion signal of the Salmonella enterica InvJ protein , 2002, Molecular microbiology.

[4]  Hans Wolf-Watz,et al.  Protein delivery into eukaryotic cells by type III secretion machines , 2006, Nature.

[5]  J. Dixon,et al.  Disruption of signaling by Yersinia effector YopJ, a ubiquitin-like protein protease. , 2000, Science.

[6]  Qing Zhang,et al.  T3DB: an integrated database for bacterial type III secretion system , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[7]  T. Rattei,et al.  Targeting effectors: the molecular recognition of Type III secreted proteins. , 2010, Microbes and infection.

[8]  Ram Samudrala,et al.  Computational Prediction of Type III and IV Secreted Effectors in Gram-Negative Bacteria , 2010, Infection and Immunity.

[9]  M. Norman,et al.  Yersinia YopE is targeted for type III secretion by N‐terminal, not mRNA, signals , 2001, Molecular microbiology.

[10]  Tal Pupko,et al.  Genome-Scale Identification of Legionella pneumophila Effectors Using a Machine Learning Approach , 2009, PLoS pathogens.

[11]  Tao Jiang,et al.  Computational prediction of type III secreted proteins from gram-negative bacteria , 2010, BMC Bioinformatics.

[12]  Seema Mattoo,et al.  A genome‐wide screen identifies a Bordetella type III secretion effector and candidate effectors in other species , 2005, Molecular microbiology.

[13]  C. E. Stebbins,et al.  A common structural motif in the binding of virulence factors to bacterial secretion chaperones. , 2006, Molecular cell.

[14]  Daoguo Zhou,et al.  The First 45 Amino Acids of SopA Are Necessary for InvB Binding and SPI-1 Secretion , 2006, Journal of bacteriology.

[15]  Qing Zhang,et al.  High-accuracy prediction of bacterial type III secreted effectors based on position-specific amino acid composition profiles , 2011, Bioinform..

[16]  David S Guttman,et al.  Terminal Reassortment Drives the Quantum Evolution of Type III Effectors in Bacterial Pathogens , 2006, PLoS pathogens.

[17]  Yejun Wang,et al.  Effective Identification of Bacterial Type III Secretion Signals Using Joint Element Features , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  Alan Collmer,et al.  Genomewide identification of proteins secreted by the Hrp type III protein secretion system of Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato DC3000 , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Gisbert Schneider,et al.  Prediction of Type III Secretion Signals in Genomes of Gram-Negative Bacteria , 2009, PloS one.

[20]  Yejun Wang,et al.  T3_MM: A Markov Model Effectively Classifies Bacterial Type III Secretion Signals , 2013, PloS one.

[21]  U. Bonas,et al.  XopC and XopJ, Two Novel Type III Effector Proteinsfrom Xanthomonas campestris pv.vesicatoria , 2003, Journal of bacteriology.

[22]  Thomas Rattei,et al.  Sequence-Based Prediction of Type III Secreted Proteins , 2009, PLoS pathogens.

[23]  Tetsuya Hayashi,et al.  An extensive repertoire of type III secretion effectors in Escherichia coli O157 and the role of lambdoid phages in their dissemination , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  C. Hueck,et al.  Type III Protein Secretion Systems in Bacterial Pathogens of Animals and Plants , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[25]  S. Üstün,et al.  The Xanthomonas campestris Type III Effector XopJ Targets the Host Cell Proteasome to Suppress Salicylic-Acid Mediated Plant Defence , 2013, PLoS pathogens.

[26]  Yue Zhang,et al.  A Yersinia Effector with Enhanced Inhibitory Activity on the NF-κB Pathway Activates the NLRP3/ASC/Caspase-1 Inflammasome in Macrophages , 2011, PLoS pathogens.

[27]  E. Stackebrandt,et al.  Uliginosibacterium gangwonense gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from a wetland, Yongneup, in Korea. , 2008, International journal of systematic and evolutionary microbiology.

[28]  Zhao-Qing Luo,et al.  Large-scale identification and translocation of type IV secretion substrates by Coxiella burnetii , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[29]  D. Guttman,et al.  The YopJ superfamily in plant-associated bacteria. , 2011, Molecular plant pathology.