Construction and Validation of Social Citizenship Index

Background: Social citizenship means creating a situation in which everyone can develop their full potential. Objectives: This study aimed to determine the social citizenship index with its various dimensions in selected countries. Methods: This study used a mixed-methods approach consisting of two phases. In the first phase, social citizenship items were extracted based on a systematic review of previous studies and interviews with experts using direct content analysis. In the second phase, the standardized index was assessed by performing the validity and reliability tests. To combine the dimensions, their values were standardized using the Z score. To analyze the data, factor analysis and normality tests were used. Results: The social citizenship index was categorized into four main dimensions, including health and education, livelihood, economic-political prosperity, and open society. In this study, 125 countries were categorized based on the Social Citizenship Index. The selected countries were classified into three categories based on the opinions of the research group and the cutting point of statistical quartiles: high (32 countries), medium (62 countries), and low (31 countries). Conclusions: It can be concluded that the social citizenship index with four main dimensions and 26 variables is a new tool that allows countries to be compared in the areas of providing welfare services to their citizens.

[1]  N. Khanjani,et al.  Measuring Liveability in Iranian Cities Using the Global Liveable City Index (GLCI) , 2021, Health Scope.

[2]  D. Davis,et al.  Collective Property Rights and Social Citizenship: Recent Trends in Urban Latin America , 2019, Social Policy and Society.

[3]  Birgitte Jensen ‘Perceived social citizenship’: a comparative study between two different hukous , 2019, Citizenship Studies.

[4]  Daniel Edmiston,et al.  Resistance or resignation to welfare reform? The activist politics for and against social citizenship , 2018, Policy & Politics.

[5]  Ijin Hong Immigration and the Boundaries of Social Citizenship in East Asia: Theoretical Considerations in a Comparative Perspective , 2018 .

[6]  Bettina Leibetseder,et al.  Subsidiarity and social citizenship: Social assistance schemes in Austria, Belgium, Switzerland and Norway , 2017 .

[7]  L. Leisering,et al.  Social citizenship for older persons? : measuring the social quality of social pensions in the global south and explaining their spread , 2017 .

[8]  J. Moses SOCIAL CITIZENSHIP AND SOCIAL RIGHTS IN AN AGE OF EXTREMES: T. H. MARSHALL'S SOCIAL PHILOSOPHY IN THE LONGUE DURÉE , 2017, Modern Intellectual History.

[9]  Ruth Patrick Wither Social Citizenship? Lived Experiences of Citizenship In/Exclusion for Recipients of Out-of-Work Benefits , 2016, Social Policy and Society.

[10]  Behnaz Raef,et al.  Comparing the Health Care System of Iran with Various Countries , 2016 .

[11]  Alexandru Panican,et al.  Social rights in the shadow of poor relief – social assistance in the universal Swedish welfare state , 2016 .

[12]  Mehdi Rahgozar,et al.  Territorial analysis of social welfare in Iran , 2015, Journal of International and Comparative Social Policy.

[13]  J. Stephens,et al.  Measuring social citizenship: achievements and future challenges , 2013 .

[14]  Anne Magnussen,et al.  Juridification and the Construction of Social Citizenship , 2013 .

[15]  A. Barrientos,et al.  Social citizenship for the global poor? The worldwide spread of social assistance , 2013 .

[16]  Shih‐Jiunn Shi Towards Inclusive Social Citizenship? Rethinking China's Social Security in the Trend towards Urban–Rural Harmonisation , 2012, Journal of Social Policy.

[17]  L. Yalçın-Heckmann Introduction: claiming social citizenship , 2011 .

[18]  A. P. Barbosa Exploring Social Rights: Between Theory and Practice , 2008 .

[19]  M. Dahan,et al.  Social Rights in the Constitution and in Practice , 2008 .

[20]  M. Powell The Hidden History of Social Citizenship , 2002 .